![CESTAT Upholds Penalty imposed u/s 114AA of Customs Act on Import of LED lights on ground of Mis-declared Quantity of Goods in Bill of Entry [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/CESTAT-CESTAT-Upholds-Penalty-Penalty-imposed-Customs-Act-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Upholds Penalty imposed u/s 114AA of Customs Act on Import of LED lights on ground of Mis-declared Quantity of Goods in Bill of Entry [Read Order]")
CESTAT Upholds Penalty imposed u/s 114AA of Customs Act on Import of LED lights on ground of Mis-declared Quantity of Goods in Bill of Entry [Read Order]
The New-Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) upheld the penalties imposed under section 114AA of the...
![CESTAT Reduces Penalty Imposed for Attempt to Export Red Sander Wood in Form of Pillar Tops on ground of Contravention of provisions of Customs Act and Foreign Trade Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/CESTAT-Penalty-Attempt-Export-Red-Sander-Wood-Pillar-Tops-provisions-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Reduces Penalty Imposed for Attempt to Export Red Sander Wood in Form of Pillar Tops on ground of Contravention of provisions of Customs Act and Foreign Trade Act [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Upholds Deletion of Penalty Imposed for Non-payment of Service Tax for Installation Commissioning Services on ground of Limitation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/CESTAT-Upholds-Deletion-of-Penalty-CESTAT-Penalty-Non-payment-of-Service-Tax-Non-payment-Service-Tax-Installation-Commissioning-Services-Installation-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Upholds Deletion of Penalty Imposed for Non-payment of Service Tax for Installation Commissioning Services on ground of Limitation [Read Order]")
![Earphones Other than the parts of Cellular Mobile Phones Attracts only Basic Custom Duty of 10% under Exemption Notification: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Earphones-Earphones-Other-than-the-parts-of-Cellular-Mobile-Phones-parts-of-Cellular-Mobile-Phones-Cellular-Mobile-Phones-Mobile-Phones-Custom-Duty-Exemption-Notification-Notification-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Earphones Other than the parts of Cellular Mobile Phones Attracts only Basic Custom Duty of 10% under Exemption Notification: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Demand of Customs Duty confirmed without giving opportunity to Cross-Examine Key Witness to Assessee: CESTAT Allows Re-Hearing [Read Order]
The Chandigarh bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) allowed re-hearing for the confirmation of the demand of customs duty without allowing cross-examining the key...
![Demand of Customs Duty confirmed without giving opportunity to Cross-Examine Key Witness to Assessee: CESTAT Allows Re-Hearing [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Demand-of-Customs-Duty-Demand-of-Customs-Duty-Confirmed-without-Giving-Opportunity-to-Cross-Examine-Assessee-CESTAT-Allows-Re-Hearing-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Demand of Customs Duty confirmed without giving opportunity to Cross-Examine Key Witness to Assessee: CESTAT Allows Re-Hearing [Read Order]")
CESTAT upholds Penalty imposed for Confiscation of Goods on ground of passing of CENVAT credit of Custom Duty through Fake Invoices [Read Order]
The New Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) upheld the penalty imposed under section 11AC of the Central Excise Act,1944 for confiscating goods on the...
![CESTAT upholds Penalty imposed for Confiscation of Goods on ground of passing of CENVAT credit of Custom Duty through Fake Invoices [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/CESTAT-CESTAT-Upholds-Penalty-Penalty-Penalty-Imposed-for-Confiscation-Confiscation-Confiscation-of-Goods-Goods-CENAVT-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT upholds Penalty imposed for Confiscation of Goods on ground of passing of CENVAT credit of Custom Duty through Fake Invoices [Read Order]")
Inadvertent Error in statement during Hearing cannot be Reason for Levy of penalty u/s 272(1)(c) of Income Tax Act: ITAT quashes Penalty against Kotak Mahindra Bank [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) quashed penalty on the grounds that an inadvertent error in statement made by the assessee during Hearing cannot be Reason for Levy of penalty...
![Inadvertent Error in statement during Hearing cannot be Reason for Levy of penalty u/s 272(1)(c) of Income Tax Act: ITAT quashes Penalty against Kotak Mahindra Bank [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Inadvertent-Error-in-statement-during-Hearing-cannot-be-Reason-for-Levy-of-penalty-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-quashes-Penalty-against-Kotak-Mahindra-Bank-TAXSCAN.jpg "Inadvertent Error in statement during Hearing cannot be Reason for Levy of penalty u/s 272(1)(c) of Income Tax Act: ITAT quashes Penalty against Kotak Mahindra Bank [Read Order]")
AO Fails to Clarify Concealment of Particulars of Income or Furnished Inaccurate Particulars: Delhi HC quashes 300% Penalty [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court quashed the 300% penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on grounds that the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to clarify the concealment of particulars...
![AO Fails to Clarify Concealment of Particulars of Income or Furnished Inaccurate Particulars: Delhi HC quashes 300% Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/AO-Fails-to-Clarify-Concealment-of-Particulars-of-Income-Delhi-Highcourt-quashes-300-Penalty-Penalty-Concealment-of-Particulars-of-Income-Delhi-Highcourt-taxscan.jpg "AO Fails to Clarify Concealment of Particulars of Income or Furnished Inaccurate Particulars: Delhi HC quashes 300% Penalty [Read Order]")
Bonafide Impression that Predecessor Already Submitted AIR Not A "Reasonable Cause" for Delay of 526 Days: Kerala HC Upholds Penalty u/s 271FA of IT Act [Read Order]
In a recent Judgement, the Kerala High Court upheld the penalty imposed under section 271A of the Income Tax Act,1961 for non-filing of an Annual Information Return (AIR) by the sub-registrar on the...
![Bonafide Impression that Predecessor Already Submitted AIR Not A Reasonable Cause for Delay of 526 Days: Kerala HC Upholds Penalty u/s 271FA of IT Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Bonafide-Impression-that-Predecessor-Already-Submitted-AIR-Reasonable-Cause-v-Kerala-HC-Upholds-Penalty-of-IT-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Bonafide Impression that Predecessor Already Submitted AIR Not A Reasonable Cause for Delay of 526 Days: Kerala HC Upholds Penalty u/s 271FA of IT Act [Read Order]")
![Penalty u/s 112 leviable when Goods are Misdeclared: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Penalty-leviable-when-Goods-are-Misdeclared-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Penalty u/s 112 leviable when Goods are Misdeclared: CESTAT [Read Order]")
No Variation in Returned Income and Assessable Income: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act Not Leviable, rules ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Pune Bench ruled that no penalty shall be levied when no variation is found in returned income and assessable income. Meera Anirudha Mirgunde, the taxpayer...
![No Variation in Returned Income and Assessable Income: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act Not Leviable, rules ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Variation-in-Returned-Income-and-Assessable-Income-Returned-Income-Assessable-Income-Income-Tax-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "No Variation in Returned Income and Assessable Income: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act Not Leviable, rules ITAT [Read Order]")