![CESTAT Quashes Penalty for Non Payment of Service Tax on ground of Wrongful Categorisation of Service Rendered as ‘Franchise Service’ [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/CESTAT-quash-penalty-impose-service-render-assessee-franchise-service-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Quashes Penalty for Non Payment of Service Tax on ground of Wrongful Categorisation of Service Rendered as ‘Franchise Service’ [Read Order]")
CESTAT Quashes Penalty for Non Payment of Service Tax on ground of Wrongful Categorisation of Service Rendered as ‘Franchise Service’ [Read Order]
The Bangalore bench of the Custom, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the penalty imposed for the nonpayment of service tax...
![CESTAT Quashes Penalty Imposed for Non Payment of Service Tax on Commercial or Industrial Construction Service on ground of Barred by Limitation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Penalty-CESTAT-Quash-commercial-industrial-service-service-tax-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Quashes Penalty Imposed for Non Payment of Service Tax on Commercial or Industrial Construction Service on ground of Barred by Limitation [Read Order]")
![Goods are Not Liable for Confiscation Even if Bulk Package Did not Contain Details of Manufacturer u/s 2 (v) of PFA Act : CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Goods-are-Not-Liable-for-Confiscation-Even-if-Bulk-Package-Did-not-Contain-Details-of-Manufacturer-PFA-Act-CESTAT-TAXSCAN-1.jpg "Goods are Not Liable for Confiscation Even if Bulk Package Did not Contain Details of Manufacturer u/s 2 (v) of PFA Act : CESTAT [Read Order]")
![No penalty can be Imposed when Entire Service Tax Discharged Along with Interest before Issuance of SCN u/s 78 of Finance Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/No-penalty-can-be-Imposed-when-Entire-Service-Tax-Discharged-Along-with-Interest-before-Issuance-of-SCN-Finance-Act-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No penalty can be Imposed when Entire Service Tax Discharged Along with Interest before Issuance of SCN u/s 78 of Finance Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Penalty u/s 272A(1)(d)Â Income Tax Act shall not levied if Reasonable Cause for Non-Compliance of Statutory Notices: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Reasonable-Cause-Non-Compliance-of-Statutory-Notices-Non-Compliance-Statutory-Notices-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Penalty u/s 272A(1)(d)Â Income Tax Act shall not levied if Reasonable Cause for Non-Compliance of Statutory Notices: ITAT [Read Order]")
![ITAT upholds Penalty levied u/s 271 of Income Tax Act due to non Compliance of Notice [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/ITAT-upholds-Penalty-levied-ITAT-Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-non-Compliance-of-Notice-Notice-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT upholds Penalty levied u/s 271 of Income Tax Act due to non Compliance of Notice [Read Order]")
Mere Estimate of Cost by DVO doesn't Constitute Material to Concealment: ITAT deletes Penalty imposed on Account of Difference of Valuation [Read Order]
The Visakhapatnam bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that a mere estimate of cost by the Departmental Valuation Officer (DVO) doesn’t constitute material to concealment and hence...
![Mere Estimate of Cost by DVO doesnt Constitute Material to Concealment: ITAT deletes Penalty imposed on Account of Difference of Valuation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Mere-Estimate-of-Cost-by-DVO-doesnt-Constitute-Material-to-Concealment-ITAT-deletes-Penalty-imposed-on-Account-of-Difference-of-Valuation-TAXSCAN.jpg "Mere Estimate of Cost by DVO doesnt Constitute Material to Concealment: ITAT deletes Penalty imposed on Account of Difference of Valuation [Read Order]")
No Penalty can be Levied u/s 271D of Income Tax Act without any Evident Reason: ITAT dismisses Appeal [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty can be imposed under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 without any evident reason. The Commissioner of...
![No Penalty can be Levied u/s 271D of Income Tax Act without any Evident Reason: ITAT dismisses Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/ITAT-Penalty-No-Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-Evident-Reason-income-tax-act-taxscan.jpg "No Penalty can be Levied u/s 271D of Income Tax Act without any Evident Reason: ITAT dismisses Appeal [Read Order]")
ITAT upholds Penalty imposed for violating Provision of S.269SS of Income Tax Act due to accepting Loan from Company’s Managing Director [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Chennai Bench uphled the penalty imposed for violating the provision of Section 269SS of Income Tax Act 1961 due to accepting loan from companies managing...
![ITAT upholds Penalty imposed for violating Provision of S.269SS of Income Tax Act due to accepting Loan from Company’s Managing Director [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/ITAT-Penalty-violating-Provision-Income-Tax-Act-Loan-from-Companys-Managing-Director-Loan-Companys-Managing-Director-taxscan.jpg "ITAT upholds Penalty imposed for violating Provision of S.269SS of Income Tax Act due to accepting Loan from Company’s Managing Director [Read Order]")
Rejection of Appeal without Considering Break Down of Vehicle and Generation of New e-way Bill within Three Minutes is 'too technical': Calcutta HCÂ
The Calcutta High Court has held that rejection of the appeal without considering the breakdown of the vehicle and generation of a new e-way bill within three minutes is 'too technical'. M/s. OFB...
MCA imposes Penalty of ₹20 Lakhs on Company and its Directors for Non-Appointment of Whole-Time Company Secretary
The company and its directors have been fined Rs. 20 lakhs by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) due to their failure to appoint a whole-time secretary. The penalty was imposed as a result of a...
No Penalty shall be Levied on Grounds of Non-Auditing of Accounts if Bonafidely Claims Exemption u/s 11 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty should be levied on the grounds of non-auditing of accounts if bonafidely claims exemption under Section 11 of Income...
![No Penalty shall be Levied on Grounds of Non-Auditing of Accounts if Bonafidely Claims Exemption u/s 11 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/No-Penalty-shall-be-Levied-on-Grounds-of-Non-Auditing-of-Accounts-if-Bonafidely-Claims-Exemption-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Penalty shall be Levied on Grounds of Non-Auditing of Accounts if Bonafidely Claims Exemption u/s 11 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")