![Penalty u/s 271D of Income Tax Act cant be imposed on loan transactions made through Banking Channels: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-imposed-loan-transactions-Banking-Channels-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Penalty u/s 271D of Income Tax Act cant be imposed on loan transactions made through Banking Channels: ITAT [Read Order]")
Penalty u/s 271D of Income Tax Act can't be imposed on loan transactions made through Banking Channels: ITAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the penalty under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be...
![ITAT Upholds the Penalty Order u/s 271of Income Tax Act due to Concealment of Particular of Income by Assessee [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/ITAT-Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Concealment-Concealment-of-Particular-of-Income-by-Assessee-ITAT-Upholds-the-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Upholds the Penalty Order u/s 271of Income Tax Act due to Concealment of Particular of Income by Assessee [Read Order]")
![Confiscation of Goods of Perishable Nature under GST Act: Supreme Court directs Rajasthan HC to consider Urgent Interim Relief [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Confiscation-Confiscation-of-Goods-Goods-Nature-GST-Act-Confiscation-of-Goods-of-Perishable-Nature-under-GST-Act-Supreme-Court-Rajasthan-HC-taxscan.jpeg "Confiscation of Goods of Perishable Nature under GST Act: Supreme Court directs Rajasthan HC to consider Urgent Interim Relief [Read Judgement]")
![No Concealment of Income or Furnishing of Inaccurate Particulars: ITAT upholds Deletion of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/No-Concealment-of-Income-or-Furnishing-of-Inaccurate-Particulars-Income-Inaccurate-Particulars-ITAT-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "No Concealment of Income or Furnishing of Inaccurate Particulars: ITAT upholds Deletion of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]")
![Relief To Kotak Mahindra Bank: Supreme Court Upholds Order of Settlement Commission Granting Immunity From Penalty Under Income Tax [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Relief-Kotak-Mahindra-Bank-Supreme-Court-Settlement-Commission-Granting-Immunity-Penalty-Income-Tax-TAXSCAN.jpg "Relief To Kotak Mahindra Bank: Supreme Court Upholds Order of Settlement Commission Granting Immunity From Penalty Under Income Tax [Read Order]")
Delayed Payment of TCS and GST is not "Penalty", Allowable as Deduction u/s 37 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]
The Jaipur bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that delayed payment of Tax collection at source (TCS) and Goods and Services Tax (GST) is not a penalty and shall be allowable as a...
![Delayed Payment of TCS and GST is not Penalty, Allowable as Deduction u/s 37 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Delayed-Payment-TCS-GST-Penalty-Deduction-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Delayed Payment of TCS and GST is not Penalty, Allowable as Deduction u/s 37 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
Merely Classifying services under an incorrect head does not amount to Fraud or Suppression of fact: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that merely classifying services under an incorrect head does not amount to fraud or suppression...
![Merely Classifying services under an incorrect head does not amount to Fraud or Suppression of fact: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Merely-Classifying-services-services-incorrect-head-amount-Suppression-of-fact-CESTAT-excise-customs-service-tax-taxscan.jpg "Merely Classifying services under an incorrect head does not amount to Fraud or Suppression of fact: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Wavier of Penalty u/s 80 allowable in absence of Evidence Establishing Suppression of fact with Intention to Evade Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Kolkata bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that Waiver of Penalty under section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 allowable in the absence of...
![Wavier of Penalty u/s 80 allowable in absence of Evidence Establishing Suppression of fact with Intention to Evade Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Wavier-Penalty-allowable-absence-Evidence-Establishing-Suppression-fact-Intention-Evade-Tax-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Wavier of Penalty u/s 80 allowable in absence of Evidence Establishing Suppression of fact with Intention to Evade Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Merely Classifying services under an incorrect head does not amount to Fraud or Suppression of fact: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that merely classifying services under an incorrect head does not amount to fraud or suppression of...
![Merely Classifying services under an incorrect head does not amount to Fraud or Suppression of fact: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Merely-Classifying-services-incorrect-head-amount-Fraud-Suppression-fact-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Merely Classifying services under an incorrect head does not amount to Fraud or Suppression of fact: CESTAT [Read Order]")
CESTAT quashes Penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for importing Chinese Phones not Justified as grounds for Penalty not established [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) allowed the appeal by K. Natrajan (the Appellant) against the penalty imposed on him by the Commissioner of...
![CESTAT quashes Penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for importing Chinese Phones not Justified as grounds for Penalty not established [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/CESTAT-quashes-Penalty-Customs-Act-for-importing-Chinese-phones-Justified-as-grounds-for-penalty-established-TAXSCAN.jpg "CESTAT quashes Penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for importing Chinese Phones not Justified as grounds for Penalty not established [Read Order]")
Penalty u/s.271B not Leviable when Assessee engaged in business of trading, financing, reality and commodities had not Maintained Books of Accounts: ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the penalty under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act 1961, would not be leviable when the assessee engaged in the business of...
![Penalty u/s.271B not Leviable when Assessee engaged in business of trading, financing, reality and commodities had not Maintained Books of Accounts: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Penalty-Leviable-Assessee-engaged-business-trading-financing-reality-commodities-Maintained-Books-Accounts-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Penalty u/s.271B not Leviable when Assessee engaged in business of trading, financing, reality and commodities had not Maintained Books of Accounts: ITAT [Read Order]")