![Penalty Imposed u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act on Ground of Concealment of Income in ROI: ITAT Deletes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Ground-of-Concealment-of-Income-in-ROI-Income-in-ROI-ROI-ITAT-Deletes-Penalty-ITAT-Penalty-Taxscan.jpg "Penalty Imposed u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act on Ground of Concealment of Income in ROI: ITAT Deletes Penalty [Read Order]")
Penalty Imposed u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act on Ground of Concealment of Income in ROI: ITAT Deletes Penalty [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted the penalty imposed by the assessing officer under section 271(1)(c) of the...
![Calcutta HC Quashes Imposition of Penalty at Rate of 200% as E-Way Bill Satisfied Conditions u/s 129 of CGST and WBGST Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Calcutta-High-Court-Calcutta-HC-Quashes-Imposition-of-Penalty-Imposition-of-Penalty-Penalty-E-Way-Bill-Satisfied-Conditions-E-Way-Bill-CGST-WBGST-Act-taxscan.jpg "Calcutta HC Quashes Imposition of Penalty at Rate of 200% as E-Way Bill Satisfied Conditions u/s 129 of CGST and WBGST Act [Read Order]")
![Penalty Imposed u/s 272A(1)(d) of Income Tax Act without Giving Proper Opportunity to Assessee: ITAT Deletes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Penalty-Imposed-of-Income-Tax-Act-without-Giving-Proper-Opportunity-to-Assessee-ITAT-Deletes-Penalty-TAXSCAN.jpg "Penalty Imposed u/s 272A(1)(d) of Income Tax Act without Giving Proper Opportunity to Assessee: ITAT Deletes Penalty [Read Order]")
![Penalty not Demandable when Assessee has Not Crossed the Threshold limit on Exemption: CESTAT sets aside Demand relying on Form H [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Penalty-not-Demandable-when-Assessee-has-Not-Crossed-the-Threshold-limit-on-Exemption-CESTAT-sets-aside-Demand-relying-on-Form-H-TAXSCAN.jpg "Penalty not Demandable when Assessee has Not Crossed the Threshold limit on Exemption: CESTAT sets aside Demand relying on Form H [Read Order]")
![No Penalty under Excise Act Invokable When Duty with interest Levied u/s 12BB on Clearance of Engine to Sister Concern: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Penalty-under-Excise-Act-Excise-Act-Penalty-interest-Levied-Engine-to-Sister-Concern-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "No Penalty under Excise Act Invokable When Duty with interest Levied u/s 12BB on Clearance of Engine to Sister Concern: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Ignorance of Indian Baggage Rules by Non-Resident Indians of UK: CESTAT Reduces Penalty Imposed [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), reduced the amount of penalty imposed on the ground that the ignorance of Indian Baggage Rules was made by a...
![Ignorance of Indian Baggage Rules by Non-Resident Indians of UK: CESTAT Reduces Penalty Imposed [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Ignorance-of-Indian-Baggage-Rules-Non-Resident-Indians-of-UK-CESTAT-Penalty-Imposed-taxscan.jpg "Ignorance of Indian Baggage Rules by Non-Resident Indians of UK: CESTAT Reduces Penalty Imposed [Read Order]")
ITAT quashes Penalty imposed u/s 271D of Income Tax Act in Absence of Satisfaction in Assessment Order [Read Order]
The Hyderabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that a penalty can’t be imposed under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 if there is no satisfaction in the assessment...
![ITAT quashes Penalty imposed u/s 271D of Income Tax Act in Absence of Satisfaction in Assessment Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Assessment-Order-passed-without-enquiry-Assessment-Order-CFS-Charges-Continental-Warehousing-Corporation-ITAT-Revision-Order-taxscan.jpg "ITAT quashes Penalty imposed u/s 271D of Income Tax Act in Absence of Satisfaction in Assessment Order [Read Order]")
Entire ‘Entry Coupon’ adjusted against Food is liable to VAT: Rajasthan HC maintains Penalty on Chokhi Dhani Resorts [Read Order]
While entertaining the Sales Tax Revision (STR) filed by the revenue department, the Rajasthan High Court maintained the penalty imposed on the Chokhi Dhani Resorts. Also quashed the order of the tax...
![Entire ‘Entry Coupon’ adjusted against Food is liable to VAT: Rajasthan HC maintains Penalty on Chokhi Dhani Resorts [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Entry-Coupon-Food-is-liable-to-VAT-Food-liable-to-VAT-VAT-Rajasthan-High-Court-Penalty-on-Chokhi-Dhani-Resorts-Penalty-Chokhi-Dhani-Resorts-taxscan.jpg "Entire ‘Entry Coupon’ adjusted against Food is liable to VAT: Rajasthan HC maintains Penalty on Chokhi Dhani Resorts [Read Order]")
Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) Cannot be Levied Merely because Claim was not Accepted or not Found to be Acceptable: ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act 1961 could not be levied merely because the claim was not accepted or...
![Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) Cannot be Levied Merely because Claim was not Accepted or not Found to be Acceptable: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Penalty-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) Cannot be Levied Merely because Claim was not Accepted or not Found to be Acceptable: ITAT [Read Order]")
Ignorance that Income Earned from Partnership Liable to Tax not Reasonable Cause for Late Filing of ITR: ITAT Upholds Penalty [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that ‘Reasonable Cause' needs to be substantiated for failure of filing of return in order to claim exemption to penalty under Section...
![Ignorance that Income Earned from Partnership Liable to Tax not Reasonable Cause for Late Filing of ITR: ITAT Upholds Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Ignorance-Income-Earned-Income-Earned-from-Partnership-Partnership-Income-Liable-to-Tax-tax-Reasonable-Cause-for-Late-Filing-Late-Filing-Late-Filing-of-ITR-ITR-ITAT-Upholds-Penalty-ITAT-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "Ignorance that Income Earned from Partnership Liable to Tax not Reasonable Cause for Late Filing of ITR: ITAT Upholds Penalty [Read Order]")
No Penalty shall be levied u/s 270A of Income Tax Act on Inadvertently Reported Annual Value of House Property by Accountant: ITAT [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has recently held that no penalty should be levied under Section 270A of Income Tax Act 1961 on inadvertently reported annual value of...
![No Penalty shall be levied u/s 270A of Income Tax Act on Inadvertently Reported Annual Value of House Property by Accountant: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/levy-Income-Tax-Act-Inadvertently-Report-Annual-Value-House-Property-Accountant-ITAT-Inadvertently-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpg "No Penalty shall be levied u/s 270A of Income Tax Act on Inadvertently Reported Annual Value of House Property by Accountant: ITAT [Read Order]")