![ITAT Upholds Levy of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act on ground of Furnishing Inaccurate Particulars of Income [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/penalty-levy-section-2711c-of-Income-Tax-Act-upheld-itat-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Upholds Levy of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act on ground of Furnishing Inaccurate Particulars of Income [Read Order]")
ITAT Upholds Levy of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act on ground of Furnishing Inaccurate Particulars of Income [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c ) of the Income Tax Act,1961...
![Non- maintenance of books of account implies no audit of account done: ITAT deletes penalty for u/s 271B [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Non-maintenance-Books-of-account-Audit-of-account-ITAT-Delets-penalty-taxscan.jpg "Non- maintenance of books of account implies no audit of account done: ITAT deletes penalty for u/s 271B [Read Order]")
![Income surrendered during Search and Seizure cannot be treated as Undisclosed: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271AAB of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Income-surrendered-during-Search-and-seizure-cannot-be-treated-as-Undisclosed-ITAT-deletes-Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Income surrendered during Search and Seizure cannot be treated as Undisclosed: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271AAB of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
![Penalty under Customs Act not Invokable in absence of Evidence on Tax Evasion: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Penalty-under-Customs-Act-absence-of-Evidence-on-Tax-Evasion-Evidence-Tax-Evasion-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Penalty under Customs Act not Invokable in absence of Evidence on Tax Evasion: CESTAT [Read Order]")
CESTAT Quashes Penalty for Non Payment of Service Tax on ground of Wrongful Categorisation of Service Rendered as ‘Franchise Service’ [Read Order]
The Bangalore bench of the Custom, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the penalty imposed for the nonpayment of service tax on the ground of wrongful categorization of...
![CESTAT Quashes Penalty for Non Payment of Service Tax on ground of Wrongful Categorisation of Service Rendered as ‘Franchise Service’ [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/CESTAT-quash-penalty-impose-service-render-assessee-franchise-service-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Quashes Penalty for Non Payment of Service Tax on ground of Wrongful Categorisation of Service Rendered as ‘Franchise Service’ [Read Order]")
CESTAT Quashes Penalty Imposed for Non Payment of Service Tax on Commercial or Industrial Construction Service on ground of Barred by Limitation [Read Order]
The Chandigarh bench of the Custom, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the penalty imposed for the non-payment of service tax on the commercial or industrial construction...
![CESTAT Quashes Penalty Imposed for Non Payment of Service Tax on Commercial or Industrial Construction Service on ground of Barred by Limitation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Penalty-CESTAT-Quash-commercial-industrial-service-service-tax-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Quashes Penalty Imposed for Non Payment of Service Tax on Commercial or Industrial Construction Service on ground of Barred by Limitation [Read Order]")
Goods are Not Liable for Confiscation Even if Bulk Package Did not Contain Details of Manufacturer u/s 2 (v) of PFA Act : CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that the goods are not liable for confiscation even if the bulk packages did not contain any details of the...
![Goods are Not Liable for Confiscation Even if Bulk Package Did not Contain Details of Manufacturer u/s 2 (v) of PFA Act : CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Goods-are-Not-Liable-for-Confiscation-Even-if-Bulk-Package-Did-not-Contain-Details-of-Manufacturer-PFA-Act-CESTAT-TAXSCAN-1.jpg "Goods are Not Liable for Confiscation Even if Bulk Package Did not Contain Details of Manufacturer u/s 2 (v) of PFA Act : CESTAT [Read Order]")
No penalty can be Imposed when Entire Service Tax Discharged Along with Interest before Issuance of SCN u/s 78 of Finance Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Kolkata bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that no penalty can be imposed when the entire service tax discharged along with interest immediately before...
![No penalty can be Imposed when Entire Service Tax Discharged Along with Interest before Issuance of SCN u/s 78 of Finance Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/No-penalty-can-be-Imposed-when-Entire-Service-Tax-Discharged-Along-with-Interest-before-Issuance-of-SCN-Finance-Act-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No penalty can be Imposed when Entire Service Tax Discharged Along with Interest before Issuance of SCN u/s 78 of Finance Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Penalty u/s 272A(1)(d)Â Income Tax Act shall not levied if Reasonable Cause for Non-Compliance of Statutory Notices: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi Bench ruled that penalty under Section 272(1)(d) of Income Tax Act, 1961 should not be levied if the assessee has reasonable cause for...
![Penalty u/s 272A(1)(d)Â Income Tax Act shall not levied if Reasonable Cause for Non-Compliance of Statutory Notices: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Reasonable-Cause-Non-Compliance-of-Statutory-Notices-Non-Compliance-Statutory-Notices-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Penalty u/s 272A(1)(d)Â Income Tax Act shall not levied if Reasonable Cause for Non-Compliance of Statutory Notices: ITAT [Read Order]")
![ITAT upholds Penalty levied u/s 271 of Income Tax Act due to non Compliance of Notice [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/ITAT-upholds-Penalty-levied-ITAT-Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-non-Compliance-of-Notice-Notice-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT upholds Penalty levied u/s 271 of Income Tax Act due to non Compliance of Notice [Read Order]")
Mere Estimate of Cost by DVO doesn't Constitute Material to Concealment: ITAT deletes Penalty imposed on Account of Difference of Valuation [Read Order]
The Visakhapatnam bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that a mere estimate of cost by the Departmental Valuation Officer (DVO) doesn’t constitute material to concealment and hence...
![Mere Estimate of Cost by DVO doesnt Constitute Material to Concealment: ITAT deletes Penalty imposed on Account of Difference of Valuation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Mere-Estimate-of-Cost-by-DVO-doesnt-Constitute-Material-to-Concealment-ITAT-deletes-Penalty-imposed-on-Account-of-Difference-of-Valuation-TAXSCAN.jpg "Mere Estimate of Cost by DVO doesnt Constitute Material to Concealment: ITAT deletes Penalty imposed on Account of Difference of Valuation [Read Order]")