![Failure to file Audit Report through a Qualified CA: ITAT upholds Penalty u/s 271B of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Failure-to-file-Audit-Report-through-a-Qualified-CA-ITAT-upholds-Penalty-us-271B-of-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Failure to file Audit Report through a Qualified CA: ITAT upholds Penalty u/s 271B of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
Failure to file Audit Report through a Qualified CA: ITAT upholds Penalty u/s 271B of Income Tax Act [Read Order]
The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has recently upheld a penalty under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as the...
![TDS Late Fees u/s 234E Leviable only Prospectively, Not Before 01/06//2015: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/TDS-Late-Fees-Leviable-Prospectively-ITAT-deletes-Penalty-Penalty-ITAT-Income-Tax-taxscan-.jpg "TDS Late Fees u/s 234E Leviable only Prospectively, Not Before 01/06//2015: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]")
![No Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of Income Tax Act for Failure to Sign on “Consent Letter” not Authorized by the Government: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/No-penalty-us-2711b-of-Income-Tax-Act-for-failure-to-sign-on-Consent-Letter-authorized-by-the-Government-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of Income Tax Act for Failure to Sign on “Consent Letter” not Authorized by the Government: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Additional Income Disclosed Originated Out of Seized Material: ITAT Upholds Penalty Levied u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Additional-Income-Additional-Income-Disclosed-Originated-Out-of-Seized-Material-Seized-Material-ITAT-Penalty-ITAT-Upholds-Penalty-Taxscan.jpg "Additional Income Disclosed Originated Out of Seized Material: ITAT Upholds Penalty Levied u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]")
![Penalty for Inaccurate Particular Not Imposable when Assessee Paid Tax before Issue of Reassessment notice under Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Penalty-for-Inaccurate-Particular-Not-Imposable-when-Assessee-Paid-Tax-Penalty-for-Inaccurate-Particular-Penalty-Inaccurate-Particular-Assessee-Taxscan.jpg "Penalty for Inaccurate Particular Not Imposable when Assessee Paid Tax before Issue of Reassessment notice under Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Non-Compliance of Notice not Deliberate: ITAT Deletes Penalty u/s 271B [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Non-Compliance-of-Notice-not-Deliberate-Notice-ITAT-Deletes-Penalty-ITAT-Penalty-Non-Compliance-Taxscan.jpg "Non-Compliance of Notice not Deliberate: ITAT Deletes Penalty u/s 271B [Read Order]")
![ITAT deletes Addition and Penalty u/s 271(c) on Estimated Income [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/ITAT-deletes-Addition-and-Penalty-us-271c-on-Estimated-Income-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT deletes Addition and Penalty u/s 271(c) on Estimated Income [Read Order]")
Customs authorities issue Penalty Order despite Interim order of Division Bench not to take Coercive steps: Madras HC sets aside Penalty Order
In a recent ruling, a Single Bench of the Madras High Court has set aside the penalty order imposed by the Customs Authorities against the petitioner despite the interim order of the Division Bench. ...
Penalty u/s 271 D of Income Tax Act Passed Beyond 6 Months is Barred by Limitation: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) of Delhi bench has held that penalty under Section 271 D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 passed beyond 6 months from the end of the month in which the assessment...
![Penalty u/s 271 D of Income Tax Act Passed Beyond 6 Months is Barred by Limitation: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Act-Passed-Beyond-6-Months-is-Barred-by-Limitation-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Penalty u/s 271 D of Income Tax Act Passed Beyond 6 Months is Barred by Limitation: ITAT [Read Order]")
No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be Imposed, Without Assistance of Assessee in Prosecuting the Levy of Penalty Proceedings: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Pune Bench, has recently, in an appeal filed before it, held that no penalty under Section 271(1)(c) can be imposed, without the assistance of the assessee...
![No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be Imposed, Without Assistance of Assessee in Prosecuting the Levy of Penalty Proceedings: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/No-Penalty-Imposed-Assistance-of-Assessee-Assessee-Penalty-Proceedings-Proceedings-ITAT-Income-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be Imposed, Without Assistance of Assessee in Prosecuting the Levy of Penalty Proceedings: ITAT [Read Order]")
CHA is Processing Agent on Documents of Clearance of Goods through Customs House: CESTAT quashes Penalty on Absence of Prior Knowledge on Mis declared Goods
The New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), quashed the penalty on absence of prior knowledge on mis declared goods and observed that a Customs House Agent...
