![Failure of Assessee to Comply with Provisions of Section 269T: ITAT upholds Penalty u/s 271E [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Failure-of-Assessee-to-Comply-with-Provisions-of-Section-269T-ITAT-upholds-Penalty-us-271E-TAXSCAN.jpg "Failure of Assessee to Comply with Provisions of Section 269T: ITAT upholds Penalty u/s 271E [Read Order]")
Failure of Assessee to Comply with Provisions of Section 269T: ITAT upholds Penalty u/s 271E [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Raipur Bench, has recently, in an appeal filed before it, on finding about the failure of the assessee to...
![ITAT deletes Penalty for Same Defaults Under Section 271(1)(b) in Second Round [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Income-Tax-Second-Round-Defaults-ITAT-deletes-Penalty-Same-Defaults-ITAT-deletes-Penalty-for-Same-Defaults-Penalty-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT deletes Penalty for Same Defaults Under Section 271(1)(b) in Second Round [Read Order]")
![Penalty u/s 271AAC is not Applicable, if Tax u/s 115BBE of Income Tax Act is NIL: ITAT directs Readjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Penalty-Tax-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-directs-Readjudication-ITAT-ITAT-Readjudication-Taxscan.jpg "Penalty u/s 271AAC is not Applicable, if Tax u/s 115BBE of Income Tax Act is NIL: ITAT directs Readjudication [Read Order]")
![ITAT Quashes Invalid Penalty Order on Deceased Assessee u/s 159(2) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/ITAT-Quashes-Invalid-Penalty-Order-Deceased-Assessee-us-1592-of-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT Quashes Invalid Penalty Order on Deceased Assessee u/s 159(2) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
![100% Penalty not Imposable as Duty along with Interest & 25% Penalty Paid within Receipt of Order: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Penalty-not-Imposable-as-Duty-along-with-Interest-Penalty-Interest-Penalty-Paid-within-Receipt-of-Order-Order-Receipt-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "100% Penalty not Imposable as Duty along with Interest & 25% Penalty Paid within Receipt of Order: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Service Tax Demand and Penalty u/s 78 of Finance Act not valid in Absence of Corroborative Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Kolkata bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that service tax demand and penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act is not valid in the absence of...
![Service Tax Demand and Penalty u/s 78 of Finance Act not valid in Absence of Corroborative Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Service-Tax-Service-Tax-Demand-Penalty-Finance-Act-Corroborative-Evidence-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Service Tax Demand and Penalty u/s 78 of Finance Act not valid in Absence of Corroborative Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Failure Of CHA to Verify KYC Document of Bogus Firm Created With Forged Document does not amount to Abetment of Export: CESTAT Sets aside Penalty
The New Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the failure of the Customs House Agent (CHA) to verify the KYC document of a bogus firm created...
No Penalty u/s 271B of Income Tax Act when there is Reasonable Cause for not getting Audited u/s 44AB: ITAT [Read Order]
The Hyderabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has recently held that no penalty should be levied under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act 1961 when there is reasonable cause for not...
![No Penalty u/s 271B of Income Tax Act when there is Reasonable Cause for not getting Audited u/s 44AB: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-Reasonable-Cause-for-not-getting-Audited-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "No Penalty u/s 271B of Income Tax Act when there is Reasonable Cause for not getting Audited u/s 44AB: ITAT [Read Order]")
ITAT Deletes Penalty U/S 271(1) (c) On Assessee in Absence of Concealment or Inaccurate Particulars of Income [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted the penalty under Section 271(1) (c) of the Income Tax Act on the assessee in the absence of concealment or inaccurate particulars...
![ITAT Deletes Penalty U/S 271(1) (c) On Assessee in Absence of Concealment or Inaccurate Particulars of Income [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/ITAT-Deletes-Penalty-Assessee-Absence-of-Concealment-Inaccurate-Particulars-of-Income-Income-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT Deletes Penalty U/S 271(1) (c) On Assessee in Absence of Concealment or Inaccurate Particulars of Income [Read Order]")
No Evidence to Prove Non-Payment of Service Tax was to Evade Tax: CESTAT sets aside Penalty Imposed u/s 78 [Read Order]
The Kolkata bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) set aside the penalty imposed under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 in the absence of evidence to prove...
![No Evidence to Prove Non-Payment of Service Tax was to Evade Tax: CESTAT sets aside Penalty Imposed u/s 78 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/No-Evidence-Non-Payment-of-Service-Tax-CESTAT-Penalty-Imposed-us-78-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Evidence to Prove Non-Payment of Service Tax was to Evade Tax: CESTAT sets aside Penalty Imposed u/s 78 [Read Order]")
Rule 96ZP of Central Excise Rules,1944 declared as Ultra Vires by Supreme Court: CESTAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]
The Kolkata bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) deleted the penalty demanded and held that Rule 96zp of Central Excise Rules, 1944 declared as ultra vires by the...
![Rule 96ZP of Central Excise Rules,1944 declared as Ultra Vires by Supreme Court: CESTAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Central-Excise-Rules-1944-Central-Excise-Rules-Rule-96ZP-of-Central-Excise-Rules-1944-declared-as-Ultra-Vires-by-Supreme-Court-CESTAT-deletes-Penalty-Supreme-Court-CESTAT-Penalty-Taxscan.jpg "Rule 96ZP of Central Excise Rules,1944 declared as Ultra Vires by Supreme Court: CESTAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]")
Basic Condition as Stipulated under Section 271(1)(c) not been Fulfilled: ITAT Deletes Penalty [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench, has recently, in an appeal filed before it, on finding that the basic condition as stipulated under Section 271 (1) (c) is not fulfilled,...
![Basic Condition as Stipulated under Section 271(1)(c) not been Fulfilled: ITAT Deletes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Basic-Condition-as-Stipulated-under-Section-2711c-ITAT-Penalty-TAXSCAN.jpg "Basic Condition as Stipulated under Section 271(1)(c) not been Fulfilled: ITAT Deletes Penalty [Read Order]")