![Limitation of one year u/s 11B of Central Excise Act not applicable when Service Tax was paid under Protest: CESTATÂ [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Central-Excise-Act-service-tax-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Limitation of one year u/s 11B of Central Excise Act not applicable when Service Tax was paid under Protest: CESTATÂ [Read Order]")
Limitation of one year u/s 11B of Central Excise Act not applicable when Service Tax was paid under Protest: CESTATÂ [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) limitation of one year under section 11b of the Central...
![Penalty under Rule 26(1) Cenvat Credit Rules imposable when Abating on Fraudulent Availment of CENVAT Credit: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Penalty-Cenvat-Credit-Rules-Fraudulent-CENVAT-Credit-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Penalty under Rule 26(1) Cenvat Credit Rules imposable when Abating on Fraudulent Availment of CENVAT Credit: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Application to SVLDR Scheme under Arrears Category allowable even if Tax Paid since it Covers Interest and Penalty: Bombay HC [Read Order]Â Â Â Â Â Â](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/SVLDR-Scheme-Arrears-Category-Application-to-SVLDR-Scheme-Tax-Paid-Interest-Penalty-Interest-and-Penalty-Bombay-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Application to SVLDR Scheme under Arrears Category allowable even if Tax Paid since it Covers Interest and Penalty: Bombay HC [Read Order]Â Â Â Â Â Â")
![Violation of Section 11AC of CEA: CESTAT Orders to Pay 25% of Penalty within 30 days from date of Communication of Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Violation-Section-11AC-of-CEA-CESTAT-penalty-communication-of-order-TAXSCAN.jpg "Violation of Section 11AC of CEA: CESTAT Orders to Pay 25% of Penalty within 30 days from date of Communication of Order [Read Order]")
![Non-Compliance of Statutory GST Requirements: Madras HC upholds Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Non-Compliance-of-Statutory-GST-Requirements-Non-Compliance-Statutory-GST-Requirements-GST-GST-Requirements-Madras-High-Court-Penalty-Taxscan.jpg "Non-Compliance of Statutory GST Requirements: Madras HC upholds Penalty [Read Order]")
Inability to Produce Manufacturer's Invoice due to Supplier's Unwillingness to Share will not attract Penalty u/s 117 of Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that inability to produce the manufacturer's invoice due to the supplier's...
![Inability to Produce Manufacturers Invoice due to Suppliers Unwillingness to Share will not attract Penalty u/s 117 of Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/manufacturers-invoice-share-Penalty-Customs-Act-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Inability to Produce Manufacturers Invoice due to Suppliers Unwillingness to Share will not attract Penalty u/s 117 of Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![No penalty u/s 78 when discharged the service tax and incorrectly utilized the same: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/penalty-service-tax-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No penalty u/s 78 when discharged the service tax and incorrectly utilized the same: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Penalty u/s 271B Not Leviable If Assessee was under Bonafide Belief that Books of Accounts Need Not be Audited: ITAT [Read Order]
The Kolkata bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has recently held that the penalty under section 271B of Income Tax Act 1961 is not leviable if the assessee was under bonafide belief...
![Penalty u/s 271B Not Leviable If Assessee was under Bonafide Belief that Books of Accounts Need Not be Audited: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Penalty-Assessee-Bonafide-Bonafide-Belief-Books-of-Accounts-Audited-ITAT-Income-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Penalty u/s 271B Not Leviable If Assessee was under Bonafide Belief that Books of Accounts Need Not be Audited: ITAT [Read Order]")
Penalty Notice Issued in Stereotyped Manner without Application of Mind: ITAT Quashes Proceedings u/s 271(1) (c) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) quashed the proceedings under section 271(1) (c), because of the penalty notice issued without application of mind and in a stereotyped manner....
![Penalty Notice Issued in Stereotyped Manner without Application of Mind: ITAT Quashes Proceedings u/s 271(1) (c) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Penalty-Notice-Application-of-Mind-ITAT-Proceedings-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpg "Penalty Notice Issued in Stereotyped Manner without Application of Mind: ITAT Quashes Proceedings u/s 271(1) (c) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
![Machine Dipped Match Splints attracts Excise Duty: CESTAT confirms Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Excise-Duty-Machine-dipped-match-splints-CESTAT-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Machine Dipped Match Splints attracts Excise Duty: CESTAT confirms Penalty [Read Order]")
Quashing of penalties in Common Cases: CESTAT sets aside Excise Penalty for alleged Clandestine Removal of Goods [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has recently set aside the penalty imposed for alleged clandestine removal of goods, as the penalties in two...
![Quashing of penalties in Common Cases: CESTAT sets aside Excise Penalty for alleged Clandestine Removal of Goods [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Quashing-of-penalties-CESTAT-Excise-Penalty-Clandestine-Removal-of-Goods-taxscan.jpg "Quashing of penalties in Common Cases: CESTAT sets aside Excise Penalty for alleged Clandestine Removal of Goods [Read Order]")