![Accepting of Share Application Money is Not “Loan” u/s 269SS of the Income Tax Act, No Penalty: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Share-Application-Money-Share-Application-Application-Money-Application-Money-Loan-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Tax-Penalty-Taxscan.jpg "Accepting of Share Application Money is Not “Loan” u/s 269SS of the Income Tax Act, No Penalty: ITAT [Read Order]")
Accepting of Share Application Money is Not “Loan” u/s 269SS of the Income Tax Act, No Penalty: ITAT [Read Order]
The Kolkata Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has recently held that accepting of share application money was not loan under section 269SS of...
![Relief to ITC: CESTAT sets aside Demand for Excise Duty and Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/ITC-CESTAT-Demand-Excise-Duty-Excise-Penalty-Taxscan.jpg "Relief to ITC: CESTAT sets aside Demand for Excise Duty and Penalty [Read Order]")
![Company couldn’t Prove that Cash Loan was taken for Urgent Disbursal of Salary: ITAT Upholds Penalty u/s 271D [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Company-Cash-Loan-Urgent-Salary-ITAT-Penalty-TAXSCAN.jpg "Company couldn’t Prove that Cash Loan was taken for Urgent Disbursal of Salary: ITAT Upholds Penalty u/s 271D [Read Order]")
![Disallowance of Claim does not mean that Particulars furnished by Assessee are Wrong: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Disallowance-of-Claim-ITAT-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "Disallowance of Claim does not mean that Particulars furnished by Assessee are Wrong: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]")
![Principles of Natural Justice not to be adhered to when there is no Enhancement of Assessment or Penalty for orders passed u/s 84 of TNVAT Act: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Principles-of-Natural-Justice-Natural-Justice-Assessment-Penalty-TNVAT-Act-Madras-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Principles of Natural Justice not to be adhered to when there is no Enhancement of Assessment or Penalty for orders passed u/s 84 of TNVAT Act: Madras HC [Read Order]")
![Vague Show Cause Notice: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Show-Cause-Notice-ITAT-Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Vague Show Cause Notice: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
CESTAT quashes Penalty imposed on failure to consider Non-Receipt of SCN by Firm or Partner [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi Bench quashed penalty imposed on the appellant on the ground of failure to consider non-receipt of Show Cause Notice (SCN)...
![CESTAT quashes Penalty imposed on failure to consider Non-Receipt of SCN by Firm or Partner [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/CESTAT-Penalty-SCN-TAXSCAN.jpg "CESTAT quashes Penalty imposed on failure to consider Non-Receipt of SCN by Firm or Partner [Read Order]")
No Reason for Imposition of Penalty: CESTAT quashes Penalty of Rs. 2 lakhs under Customs Act [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), quashed penalty of Rupees 2 lakhs under Customs Act on the ground that the reason for imposition of penalty was...
![No Reason for Imposition of Penalty: CESTAT quashes Penalty of Rs. 2 lakhs under Customs Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Imposition-of-Penalty-CESTAT-Customs-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Reason for Imposition of Penalty: CESTAT quashes Penalty of Rs. 2 lakhs under Customs Act [Read Order]")
Penalty u/s 40 (2) can't be invoked in absence of deliberate filing of Incorrect Return: Jharkhand HC [Read Order]
In a recent case, the High Court (HC)of Jharkhand has held that penalty under section 40 (2) of the Jharkhand Value Added Tax Act,2005 (JVAT) can't be invoked in absence of deliberate filing of...
![Penalty u/s 40 (2) cant be invoked in absence of deliberate filing of Incorrect Return: Jharkhand HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Penalty-Incorrect-Return-Jharkhand-HC-TAXSCAN.jpg "Penalty u/s 40 (2) cant be invoked in absence of deliberate filing of Incorrect Return: Jharkhand HC [Read Order]")
Imposes Penalty for violation of Section 269SS without Jurisdiction: ITAT quashes the Order [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) set aside the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)[(CIT)(A)]/NFAC and directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to cancel the penalty...
![Imposes Penalty for violation of Section 269SS without Jurisdiction: ITAT quashes the Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Penalty-Jurisdiction-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Imposes Penalty for violation of Section 269SS without Jurisdiction: ITAT quashes the Order [Read Order]")
Bonafide doubt as to Service Tax liability and No Intentional evasion of Service Tax: CESTAT deletes Penalty under Finance Act [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) deleted penalty under the Finance Act on the ground that there was bonafide doubt as to Service Tax liability and...
![Bonafide doubt as to Service Tax liability and No Intentional evasion of Service Tax: CESTAT deletes Penalty under Finance Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/evasion-of-Service-Tax-Bonafide-doubt-Service-Tax-liability-Service-Tax-Intentional-evasion-Intentional-evasion-of-Service-Tax-CESTAT-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "Bonafide doubt as to Service Tax liability and No Intentional evasion of Service Tax: CESTAT deletes Penalty under Finance Act [Read Order]")
Circulars, though binding on the Department, is not so on the Tribunal: CESTAT Quashes Notice Against DCM Hyundai [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), quashed notice against M/s. DCM Hyundai Ltd, the appellant and held that Circulars, though binding on the...
![Circulars, though binding on the Department, is not so on the Tribunal: CESTAT Quashes Notice Against DCM Hyundai [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Circulars-Department-Tribunal-CESTAT-Notice-DCM-Hyundai-TAXSCAN.jpg "Circulars, though binding on the Department, is not so on the Tribunal: CESTAT Quashes Notice Against DCM Hyundai [Read Order]")