![Amount for Compounding of Offence under GST Act shall Not Exceed Penalty Leviable: Bombay HC Quashes Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/GST-Act-GST-Penalty-Bombay-High-Court-Bombay-HC-Quashes-Order-taxscan.jpg "Amount for Compounding of Offence under GST Act shall Not Exceed Penalty Leviable: Bombay HC Quashes Order [Read Order]")
Amount for Compounding of Offence under GST Act shall Not Exceed Penalty Leviable: Bombay HC Quashes Order [Read Order]
The High Court of Bombay High Court at Goa, while quashing an order for compounding of offence, has held that the amount for the compounding of...
![Relief to Citibank: CESTAT quashes Penalty imposed u/s 112 Customs Act on purchase of ATMs made within India [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/CESTAT-Citibank-Penalty-CESTAT-quashes-Penalty-Customs-Act-ATM-taxscan.jpg "Relief to Citibank: CESTAT quashes Penalty imposed u/s 112 Customs Act on purchase of ATMs made within India [Read Order]")
![Penalty on wrong CENVAT Credit availed solely based upon Statements cannot be confirmed unless stood the test u/s 9(D) of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Penalty-CENVAT-Credit-Statements-confirmed-Central-Excise-Act-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Penalty on wrong CENVAT Credit availed solely based upon Statements cannot be confirmed unless stood the test u/s 9(D) of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Lapse of Six Months on Penalty proceedings violation of Cash Transactions u/s 269SS: Delhi HC quashes Penalty [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court quashed penalty under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the ground that there was lapse of six months on penalty proceedings on violation of cash transactions under...
![Lapse of Six Months on Penalty proceedings violation of Cash Transactions u/s 269SS: Delhi HC quashes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Penalty-penalty-proceedings-Cash-Transaction-violation-of-cash-transactions-Delhi-HC-penalty-taxscan.jpg "Lapse of Six Months on Penalty proceedings violation of Cash Transactions u/s 269SS: Delhi HC quashes Penalty [Read Order]")
Penalty under Customs Act on 'Smuggling 'not valid When Authorities act Without evincing illicit Trafficking: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ), held that Penalty under Customs Act on 'smuggling 'not valid when authorities act without evincing illicit...
![Penalty under Customs Act on Smuggling not valid When Authorities act Without evincing illicit Trafficking: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Penalty-Customs-Act-Smuggling-Authorities-act-evincing-illicit-Trafficking-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Penalty under Customs Act on Smuggling not valid When Authorities act Without evincing illicit Trafficking: CESTAT [Read Order]")
No Subsequent Imposition of Penalty to be made Once Notice Complied and Documents Timely Filed: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Allahabad Bench, has recently, in an appeal filed before it, held that no subsequent imposition of penalty can be made once the assessee has complied with...
![No Subsequent Imposition of Penalty to be made Once Notice Complied and Documents Timely Filed: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Penalty-Notice-Documents-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Subsequent Imposition of Penalty to be made Once Notice Complied and Documents Timely Filed: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Payment of entire Duty and Penalty: CESTAT holds direction to remand matter is unnecessary [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Payment-Duty-and-Penalty-CESTAT-remand-taxscan.jpg "Payment of entire Duty and Penalty: CESTAT holds direction to remand matter is unnecessary [Read Order]")
Error Occurred Inadvertently and Assessee filed Reversed Return Admitting Demand: Delhi HC upholds decision set aside Penalty Proceedings u/s 271 [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court presided by Mr. Justice Manmohan and Ms. Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora has upholds decision set asiding penalty proceedings u/s 271 since error occurred inadvertently and...
![Error Occurred Inadvertently and Assessee filed Reversed Return Admitting Demand: Delhi HC upholds decision set aside Penalty Proceedings u/s 271 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Assessee-Reversed-Return-Demand-Delhi-Hc-Penalty-Proceedings-taxscan.jpg "Error Occurred Inadvertently and Assessee filed Reversed Return Admitting Demand: Delhi HC upholds decision set aside Penalty Proceedings u/s 271 [Read Order]")
![Issue of SCN to Driver: Madras HC quashes demand of Tax and Penalty in Form GST MOV-09 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Issue-SCN-Driver-Madras-HC-Tax-Penalty-GST-TAXSCAN.jpg "Issue of SCN to Driver: Madras HC quashes demand of Tax and Penalty in Form GST MOV-09 [Read Order]")