![Rule 26 not applicable to Non-Functional Directors, Penalty not sustained: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/non-functional-directors-Penalty-CESTAT-taxscan.jpeg "Rule 26 not applicable to Non-Functional Directors, Penalty not sustained: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Rule 26 not applicable to Non-Functional Directors, Penalty not sustained: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) of the Allahabad bench has ruled that Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules does not...
![Imposing Penalty of Five Times of Regular Fee on Non-Fumigation of Timber with Methyl Bromide under PQ Order, 2003 is Unconstitutional: Gujarat HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Penalty-Gujarat-HC-taxscan.jpeg "Imposing Penalty of Five Times of Regular Fee on Non-Fumigation of Timber with Methyl Bromide under PQ Order, 2003 is Unconstitutional: Gujarat HC [Read Judgment]")
![Penalty imposed on Customs Broker u/s 112 (a) shouldnt be Exemplary that the ends of justice arent met: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Penalty-customs-broker-justice-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Penalty imposed on Customs Broker u/s 112 (a) shouldnt be Exemplary that the ends of justice arent met: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Capital Gain arising from Sale of Land not Receipts from Business: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271 B [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Capital-gain-sale-of-land-business-ITAT-penalty-taxscan.jpg "Capital Gain arising from Sale of Land not Receipts from Business: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271 B [Read Order]")
ITAT quashes Levy of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) without mentioning Specific Charge in the Notice issued u/s 274 [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi bench presided by Mr. Challa Nagendra Prasad, Judicial Member has quashed levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) without mentioning specific charge in...
![ITAT quashes Levy of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) without mentioning Specific Charge in the Notice issued u/s 274 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/ITAT-Penalty-Notice-taxscan.jpeg "ITAT quashes Levy of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) without mentioning Specific Charge in the Notice issued u/s 274 [Read Order]")
Revisional Jurisdiction cannot be invoked to Initiate Penalty without finding that Assessment is Erroneous: ITAT [Read Order]
The Jaipur bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the revisional jurisdiction of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961...
![Revisional Jurisdiction cannot be invoked to Initiate Penalty without finding that Assessment is Erroneous: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Revisional-Jurisdiction-Penalty-Assessment-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Revisional Jurisdiction cannot be invoked to Initiate Penalty without finding that Assessment is Erroneous: ITAT [Read Order]")
Bonafide Action of Non-Sharing of AIR by Co-Operative Bank u/s 271FA will not attract Penalty: ITAT [Read Order]
The Hyderabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that a bonafide action on the part of the co-operative bank not filing annual information report (AIR) will not attract...
![Bonafide Action of Non-Sharing of AIR by Co-Operative Bank u/s 271FA will not attract Penalty: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Bonafide-Action-Co-Operative-Bank-Penalty-ITAT-taxscan.jpeg "Bonafide Action of Non-Sharing of AIR by Co-Operative Bank u/s 271FA will not attract Penalty: ITAT [Read Order]")
Deliberate Mis-Declaration and Overvaluation of Imports: CESTAT upholds Rejection of Duty Drawback and imposition of Penalties [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi has upheld the rejection of duty drawback and imposition of penalties for deliberate mis-declaration and overvaluation of...
![Deliberate Mis-Declaration and Overvaluation of Imports: CESTAT upholds Rejection of Duty Drawback and imposition of Penalties [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Imports-CESTAT-Duty-Drawback-taxscan.jpg "Deliberate Mis-Declaration and Overvaluation of Imports: CESTAT upholds Rejection of Duty Drawback and imposition of Penalties [Read Order]")
No Penalty u/s 271C when delay in Filing Appeal occurred due to Ambiguity on direction contained in Statutory Document: ITAT [Read Order]
No Penalty u/s 271C when delay in filing appeal occurred due to ambiguity on direction contained in statutory document, so was held by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), New Delhi. The...
![No Penalty u/s 271C when delay in Filing Appeal occurred due to Ambiguity on direction contained in Statutory Document: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Penalty-appeal-statutory-document-ITAT-taxscan.jpeg "No Penalty u/s 271C when delay in Filing Appeal occurred due to Ambiguity on direction contained in Statutory Document: ITAT [Read Order]")
No Search Conducted on Assessee: ITAT upholds Deletion of Penalty u/s 271AAB on Undisclosed Income [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), has held that no search was conducted on the assessee and upholds the deletion of penalty under section 271AAB on undisclosed income. The...
![No Search Conducted on Assessee: ITAT upholds Deletion of Penalty u/s 271AAB on Undisclosed Income [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Assessee-ITAT-Penalty-Undisclosed-Income-taxscan.jpeg "No Search Conducted on Assessee: ITAT upholds Deletion of Penalty u/s 271AAB on Undisclosed Income [Read Order]")