Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Penalty u/s 112(b) not sustained in Absence of Possession of Smuggled Gold bars by Assessee: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Penalty-absence-smuggled-assessee-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Penalty u/s 112(b) not sustained in Absence of Possession of Smuggled Gold bars by Assessee: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Penalty u/s 112(b) not sustained in Absence of Possession of Smuggled Gold bars by Assessee: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise &Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) of Ahmedabad bench held that the penalty under section 112(b) of the Customs...
![Excise Duty not demandable on broken Bottles of Beverages: CESTAT allows Pepsicos appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Excise-duty-demandable-beverages-CESTAT-Pepsicos-appeal-TAXSCAN.jpg "Excise Duty not demandable on broken Bottles of Beverages: CESTAT allows Pepsicos appeal [Read Order]")
![Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) not leviable on Bonafide Mistake: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Penalty-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) not leviable on Bonafide Mistake: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Once Income Declared and Income Tax Return Filed, Penalty u/s 271 (1) (C) not to be Later Levied: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Income-Return-Penalty-ITAT.jpg "Once Income Declared and Income Tax Return Filed, Penalty u/s 271 (1) (C) not to be Later Levied: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) not sustainable in the absence of Concealment or Furnishing of inaccurate particulars of Income: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Penalty-concealment-income-ITAT-taxscan.jpeg "Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) not sustainable in the absence of Concealment or Furnishing of inaccurate particulars of Income: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Penalty u/s 271 (1) (c)cannot be imposed for Unsustainable Claims: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Penalty-imposed-unsustainable-claims-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpeg "Penalty u/s 271 (1) (c)cannot be imposed for Unsustainable Claims: ITAT [Read Order]")
Authority cannot Mechanically impose Penalty for Short Levy or Non-Levy of Duty u/s 11AC of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata Bench authority cannot mechanically impose penalty for short levy or non-levy of duty u/s 11AC of Central Excise Act, 1994. ...
![Authority cannot Mechanically impose Penalty for Short Levy or Non-Levy of Duty u/s 11AC of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/penalty-Central-Excise-Act-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Authority cannot Mechanically impose Penalty for Short Levy or Non-Levy of Duty u/s 11AC of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Penalty can be levied only on Charges for which Penalty proceedings were initiated: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Penalty-proceedings-ITAT-taxscan.jpeg "Penalty can be levied only on Charges for which Penalty proceedings were initiated: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Rule 26 not applicable to Non-Functional Directors, Penalty not sustained: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/non-functional-directors-Penalty-CESTAT-taxscan.jpeg "Rule 26 not applicable to Non-Functional Directors, Penalty not sustained: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Imposing Penalty of Five Times of Regular Fee on Non-Fumigation of Timber with Methyl Bromide under PQ Order, 2003 is Unconstitutional: Gujarat HC [Read Judgment]
The Gujarat High Court has recently, while allowing a writ petition, held that imposing penalty of 5 times the regular fees upon the appellants, under Clause 14 (2),Chapter VI of the Plant Quarantine...
![Imposing Penalty of Five Times of Regular Fee on Non-Fumigation of Timber with Methyl Bromide under PQ Order, 2003 is Unconstitutional: Gujarat HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Penalty-Gujarat-HC-taxscan.jpeg "Imposing Penalty of Five Times of Regular Fee on Non-Fumigation of Timber with Methyl Bromide under PQ Order, 2003 is Unconstitutional: Gujarat HC [Read Judgment]")
Penalty imposed on Customs Broker u/s 112 (a) shouldn't be Exemplary that the ends of justice aren't met: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai, has recently in an appeal filed before it, ruled that the penalty imposed on a customs broker under section 112(a) of the...
![Penalty imposed on Customs Broker u/s 112 (a) shouldnt be Exemplary that the ends of justice arent met: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Penalty-customs-broker-justice-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Penalty imposed on Customs Broker u/s 112 (a) shouldnt be Exemplary that the ends of justice arent met: CESTAT [Read Order]")