![Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) not sustainable in the absence of Concealment or Furnishing of inaccurate particulars of Income: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Penalty-concealment-income-ITAT-taxscan.jpeg "Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) not sustainable in the absence of Concealment or Furnishing of inaccurate particulars of Income: ITAT [Read Order]")
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) not sustainable in the absence of Concealment or Furnishing of inaccurate particulars of Income: ITAT [Read Order]
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act,1961 is not sustainable in the absence of concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of...
![Penalty u/s 271 (1) (c)cannot be imposed for Unsustainable Claims: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Penalty-imposed-unsustainable-claims-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpeg "Penalty u/s 271 (1) (c)cannot be imposed for Unsustainable Claims: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Authority cannot Mechanically impose Penalty for Short Levy or Non-Levy of Duty u/s 11AC of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/penalty-Central-Excise-Act-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Authority cannot Mechanically impose Penalty for Short Levy or Non-Levy of Duty u/s 11AC of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Penalty can be levied only on Charges for which Penalty proceedings were initiated: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Penalty-proceedings-ITAT-taxscan.jpeg "Penalty can be levied only on Charges for which Penalty proceedings were initiated: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Rule 26 not applicable to Non-Functional Directors, Penalty not sustained: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/non-functional-directors-Penalty-CESTAT-taxscan.jpeg "Rule 26 not applicable to Non-Functional Directors, Penalty not sustained: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Imposing Penalty of Five Times of Regular Fee on Non-Fumigation of Timber with Methyl Bromide under PQ Order, 2003 is Unconstitutional: Gujarat HC [Read Judgment]
The Gujarat High Court has recently, while allowing a writ petition, held that imposing penalty of 5 times the regular fees upon the appellants, under Clause 14 (2),Chapter VI of the Plant Quarantine...
![Imposing Penalty of Five Times of Regular Fee on Non-Fumigation of Timber with Methyl Bromide under PQ Order, 2003 is Unconstitutional: Gujarat HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Penalty-Gujarat-HC-taxscan.jpeg "Imposing Penalty of Five Times of Regular Fee on Non-Fumigation of Timber with Methyl Bromide under PQ Order, 2003 is Unconstitutional: Gujarat HC [Read Judgment]")
Penalty imposed on Customs Broker u/s 112 (a) shouldn't be Exemplary that the ends of justice aren't met: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai, has recently in an appeal filed before it, ruled that the penalty imposed on a customs broker under section 112(a) of the...
![Penalty imposed on Customs Broker u/s 112 (a) shouldnt be Exemplary that the ends of justice arent met: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Penalty-customs-broker-justice-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Penalty imposed on Customs Broker u/s 112 (a) shouldnt be Exemplary that the ends of justice arent met: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Capital Gain arising from Sale of Land not Receipts from Business: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271 B [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Pune Bench held that Capital gain arising from sale of land not receipts from business, thereby deleting penalty imposed under Section 271B of the Income Tax...
![Capital Gain arising from Sale of Land not Receipts from Business: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271 B [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Capital-gain-sale-of-land-business-ITAT-penalty-taxscan.jpg "Capital Gain arising from Sale of Land not Receipts from Business: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271 B [Read Order]")
ITAT quashes Levy of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) without mentioning Specific Charge in the Notice issued u/s 274 [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi bench presided by Mr. Challa Nagendra Prasad, Judicial Member has quashed levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) without mentioning specific charge in...
![ITAT quashes Levy of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) without mentioning Specific Charge in the Notice issued u/s 274 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/ITAT-Penalty-Notice-taxscan.jpeg "ITAT quashes Levy of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) without mentioning Specific Charge in the Notice issued u/s 274 [Read Order]")
Revisional Jurisdiction cannot be invoked to Initiate Penalty without finding that Assessment is Erroneous: ITAT [Read Order]
The Jaipur bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the revisional jurisdiction of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961...
![Revisional Jurisdiction cannot be invoked to Initiate Penalty without finding that Assessment is Erroneous: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Revisional-Jurisdiction-Penalty-Assessment-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Revisional Jurisdiction cannot be invoked to Initiate Penalty without finding that Assessment is Erroneous: ITAT [Read Order]")