![Penalty under Central Excise Act is not sustainable by Third Party Evidence, can’t claim Duty on Clandestine Removal: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Penalty-Central-Excise-Act-third-party-evidence-claim-duty-clandestine-removal-CESTAT-taxscan.jpeg "Penalty under Central Excise Act is not sustainable by Third Party Evidence, can’t claim Duty on Clandestine Removal: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Penalty under Central Excise Act is not sustainable by Third Party Evidence, can’t claim Duty on Clandestine Removal: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Principal Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the demand of duty and penalty under the...
![Non-mentioning of Relevant Limb in Penalty Notice is not a Curable Defect: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Penalty-Notice-Relevant-Limb-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Non-mentioning of Relevant Limb in Penalty Notice is not a Curable Defect: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Income Tax Return not filed after receiving Re-Assessment Notice: ITAT upholds Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Income-Tax-Return-Re-Assessment-Notice-ITAT-upholds-Penalty-taxscan.jpeg "Income Tax Return not filed after receiving Re-Assessment Notice: ITAT upholds Penalty [Read Order]")
![Penalty can’t be invoked under Income Tax Act without relevant Documents which substantiate Business Activities: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-relevant-documents-substantiate-business-activities-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Penalty can’t be invoked under Income Tax Act without relevant Documents which substantiate Business Activities: ITAT [Read Order]")
![No Specific Charges mentioned in S. 274 Notice: ITAT deletes Penalty Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Specific-Charges-Notice-ITAT-Penalty-Order-taxscan.jpg "No Specific Charges mentioned in S. 274 Notice: ITAT deletes Penalty Order [Read Order]")
Cogent Evidence is needed to establish a Charge against Clandestine Removal, No Penalty sustained under Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that cogent evidence is needed to establish a charge against clandestine removal and no penalty sustained...
![Cogent Evidence is needed to establish a Charge against Clandestine Removal, No Penalty sustained under Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Cogent-evidence-penalty-Central-Excise-Act-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Cogent Evidence is needed to establish a Charge against Clandestine Removal, No Penalty sustained under Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![CHA not Responsible for Abetment if no Reason to Doubt Malpractice: CESTAT quashes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/CHA-Abetment-Malpractice-CESTAT-Penalty-Taxscan.jpeg "CHA not Responsible for Abetment if no Reason to Doubt Malpractice: CESTAT quashes Penalty [Read Order]")
![Notice not served on Assessee due to Change of Address: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Notice-Assessee-Change-of-Address-ITAT-deletes-Penalty-Taxscan.jpg "Notice not served on Assessee due to Change of Address: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]")
Relief to Asian Paints: Madras HC orders GST Dept to release Seized Goods upon receipt of Bank Guarantee [Read Order]
In a relief to Asian Paints Limited, a leading brand and manufacturer in paints, the Madras High Court has directed the GST department to accept a bank guarantee and release the goods under the...
![Relief to Asian Paints: Madras HC orders GST Dept to release Seized Goods upon receipt of Bank Guarantee [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Asian-Paints-Madras-HC-GST-Dept-Seized-Goods-Bank-Guarantee-Taxscan.jpeg "Relief to Asian Paints: Madras HC orders GST Dept to release Seized Goods upon receipt of Bank Guarantee [Read Order]")
Cash Transactions between Trust and Managing Trustee are not covered u/s 269SS of Income Tax Act: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]
The Bangalore bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the managing trustee of the society is not covered by the expression “any other persons” occurring in section 269SS or...
![Cash Transactions between Trust and Managing Trustee are not covered u/s 269SS of Income Tax Act: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Cash-Transactions-Trust-Managing-Trustee-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-Penalty-Taxscan.jpg "Cash Transactions between Trust and Managing Trustee are not covered u/s 269SS of Income Tax Act: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]")
Service Tax cannot be levied for Total Receipt falling below Threshold limit of 10 Lakh, No penalty under Finance Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that service tax cannot be levied for total receipt falling below the threshold limit of Rs. 10,00,000/-...
![Service Tax cannot be levied for Total Receipt falling below Threshold limit of 10 Lakh, No penalty under Finance Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Service-Tax-levied-total-receipt-falling-threshold-limit-penalty-Finance-Act-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpeg "Service Tax cannot be levied for Total Receipt falling below Threshold limit of 10 Lakh, No penalty under Finance Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")