![CESTAT upholds Penalty on Importer of Ship Breaking Vessels for Sale of Gas Cylinder without Scrapping [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/CESTAT-Penalty-Importer-Ship-Breaking-Vessels-Sale-Gas-Cylinder-Scrapping-Taxscan.jpeg "CESTAT upholds Penalty on Importer of Ship Breaking Vessels for Sale of Gas Cylinder without Scrapping [Read Order]")
CESTAT upholds Penalty on Importer of Ship Breaking Vessels for Sale of Gas Cylinder without Scrapping [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has upheld the penalty imposed on the importer of ship...
![Suspicion cannot be treated as proof in absence of Corroborative Evidence: CESTAT reduces Penalty under Customs Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Suspicion-Corroborative-Evidence-CESTAT-penalty-Customs-Act-Taxscan.jpeg "Suspicion cannot be treated as proof in absence of Corroborative Evidence: CESTAT reduces Penalty under Customs Act [Read Order]")
![No Penalty If Assessee paid Excise Duty with Interest prior to Issue of Show Cause Notice: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Penalty-Assessee-Excise-Duty-Show-Cause-Notice-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "No Penalty If Assessee paid Excise Duty with Interest prior to Issue of Show Cause Notice: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![ITAT quashes Penalty imposed by AO for Non-Compliance of Section 274 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/ITAT-penalty-AO-Section-274-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT quashes Penalty imposed by AO for Non-Compliance of Section 274 [Read Order]")
![Defect in Proper Notice u/s 274 vitiates the Assumption of Jurisdiction by AO: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/notice-jurisdiction-AO-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Defect in Proper Notice u/s 274 vitiates the Assumption of Jurisdiction by AO: ITAT [Read Order]")
Penalty under Central Excise Act is not sustainable by Third Party Evidence, can’t claim Duty on Clandestine Removal: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Principal Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the demand of duty and penalty under the Central Excise Act is not sustainable by the...
![Penalty under Central Excise Act is not sustainable by Third Party Evidence, can’t claim Duty on Clandestine Removal: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Penalty-Central-Excise-Act-third-party-evidence-claim-duty-clandestine-removal-CESTAT-taxscan.jpeg "Penalty under Central Excise Act is not sustainable by Third Party Evidence, can’t claim Duty on Clandestine Removal: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Non-mentioning of Relevant Limb in Penalty Notice is not a Curable Defect: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Penalty-Notice-Relevant-Limb-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Non-mentioning of Relevant Limb in Penalty Notice is not a Curable Defect: ITAT [Read Order]")
Income Tax Return not filed after receiving Re-Assessment Notice: ITAT upholds Penalty [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad bench has upheld the penalty order by observing that the income tax return was not filed after receiving the re-assessment notice under section 148...
![Income Tax Return not filed after receiving Re-Assessment Notice: ITAT upholds Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Income-Tax-Return-Re-Assessment-Notice-ITAT-upholds-Penalty-taxscan.jpeg "Income Tax Return not filed after receiving Re-Assessment Notice: ITAT upholds Penalty [Read Order]")
Penalty can’t be invoked under Income Tax Act without relevant Documents which substantiate Business Activities: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi bench has held that penalty can’t be invoked under Income Tax Act without relevant documents which substantiate business activities. The appellant...
![Penalty can’t be invoked under Income Tax Act without relevant Documents which substantiate Business Activities: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-relevant-documents-substantiate-business-activities-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Penalty can’t be invoked under Income Tax Act without relevant Documents which substantiate Business Activities: ITAT [Read Order]")
![No Specific Charges mentioned in S. 274 Notice: ITAT deletes Penalty Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Specific-Charges-Notice-ITAT-Penalty-Order-taxscan.jpg "No Specific Charges mentioned in S. 274 Notice: ITAT deletes Penalty Order [Read Order]")
Cogent Evidence is needed to establish a Charge against Clandestine Removal, No Penalty sustained under Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that cogent evidence is needed to establish a charge against clandestine removal and no penalty sustained...
![Cogent Evidence is needed to establish a Charge against Clandestine Removal, No Penalty sustained under Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Cogent-evidence-penalty-Central-Excise-Act-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Cogent Evidence is needed to establish a Charge against Clandestine Removal, No Penalty sustained under Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![CHA not Responsible for Abetment if no Reason to Doubt Malpractice: CESTAT quashes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/CHA-Abetment-Malpractice-CESTAT-Penalty-Taxscan.jpeg "CHA not Responsible for Abetment if no Reason to Doubt Malpractice: CESTAT quashes Penalty [Read Order]")