Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Penalty under Section 271B can’t be levied for Failure to get Accounts Audited under Section 44AB: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/No-Penalty-Taxscan.jpg "Penalty under Section 271B can’t be levied for Failure to get Accounts Audited under Section 44AB: ITAT [Read Order]")
Penalty under Section 271B can’t be levied for Failure to get Accounts Audited under Section 44AB: ITAT [Read Order]
In Roshini Devi vs. Income Tax Officer, the Jaipur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) held that penalty under Section 271B of the...
![Offering Income under a Wrong Head would not attract Penalty: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Offering Income under a Wrong Head would not attract Penalty: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Penalty u/s 114 can’t be ground for refusing renewal of Customs Broker License: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Customs-Broker-License-Taxscan.jpg "Penalty u/s 114 can’t be ground for refusing renewal of Customs Broker License: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Penalty under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules is leviable on Natural Person Only: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Penalty-TaxScan.jpg "Penalty under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules is leviable on Natural Person Only: CESTAT [Read Order]")
CESTAT grants Relief to Mercedes Benz: Sets aside Penalty for erroneous CENVAT Credit Claim [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) Mumbai on April 4th partly allowed an appeal filed by Mercedes Benz India Pvt. Ltd. by setting aside a penalty imposed on them due...
![CESTAT grants Relief to Mercedes Benz: Sets aside Penalty for erroneous CENVAT Credit Claim [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Mercedes-Benz-Taxscan.jpg "CESTAT grants Relief to Mercedes Benz: Sets aside Penalty for erroneous CENVAT Credit Claim [Read Order]")
![No Penalty against CHA for Unknowingly Filling Shipping Bills of Prohibited Goods: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "No Penalty against CHA for Unknowingly Filling Shipping Bills of Prohibited Goods: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Penalty need not be levied in case of every Addition Confirmed: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Penalty-Tax-Scan.jpg "Penalty need not be levied in case of every Addition Confirmed: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Civil Contractor can’t be penalized u/s 271A of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Civil-Contractor-Taxscan.jpg "Civil Contractor can’t be penalized u/s 271A of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
Penalty need not be deleted on mere ground that Quantum Appeal is admitted on a Substantial Question of Law: Bombay High Court [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court in the case of Principal Commissioner of Income TaxÂ2 vs. M/s Shree Gopal Housing & Plantation corporation held that there can be no universal rule to the effect that no...
![Penalty need not be deleted on mere ground that Quantum Appeal is admitted on a Substantial Question of Law: Bombay High Court [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Penalty-Bombay-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Penalty need not be deleted on mere ground that Quantum Appeal is admitted on a Substantial Question of Law: Bombay High Court [Read Order]")
No Penalty If Cash above Rs 20000 received from Brother and Father due to Business Exigencies: Income Tax Tribunal [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that if cash was received from brother and father of the assessee to meet business exigencies, such transactions cannot be...
![No Penalty If Cash above Rs 20000 received from Brother and Father due to Business Exigencies: Income Tax Tribunal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Cash-Transactions.jpg "No Penalty If Cash above Rs 20000 received from Brother and Father due to Business Exigencies: Income Tax Tribunal [Read Order]")