Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Confiscation and Penalty can’t be Imposed Merely on Ground that Importer of ‘Arms’ was not a Renowned Shooter: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Confiscation-Taxscan.jpg "Confiscation and Penalty can’t be Imposed Merely on Ground that Importer of ‘Arms’ was not a Renowned Shooter: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Confiscation and Penalty can’t be Imposed Merely on Ground that Importer of ‘Arms’ was not a 'Renowned' Shooter: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) in Nishant Sanjay Ghogare v. Commissioner of Customs, Airport,...
![Non-Availability of Staff not an Excuse to avoid Penalty for Delay in Filing TDS Statement: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/TDS-Statement.jpg "Non-Availability of Staff not an Excuse to avoid Penalty for Delay in Filing TDS Statement: ITAT [Read Order]")
![No Penalty if Assessee Wrongly mentioned PAN in place of TAN in TDS Challan: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/PAN-Penalty-TAN-Taxscan.jpg "No Penalty if Assessee Wrongly mentioned PAN in place of TAN in TDS Challan: ITAT [Read Order]")
![CBIC authorizes Customs Officers to adjudge Confiscation / Penalty [Read Notification]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Customs-CBIC-Taxscan.jpg "CBIC authorizes Customs Officers to adjudge Confiscation / Penalty [Read Notification]")
![Penalty paid to Stock Exchange is a regular Business Expenditure: ITAT allows Deduction [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Business-Income-Taxscan.jpg "Penalty paid to Stock Exchange is a regular Business Expenditure: ITAT allows Deduction [Read Order]")
![Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can’t be Imposed when Income is determined on Estimate Basis: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/ITAT-Ahmedabad.jpg "Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can’t be Imposed when Income is determined on Estimate Basis: ITAT [Read Order]")
CESTAT confirms Penalty as Assessee Wrongfully availed Credit knowing that ‘ Trading Activity ’ was not a Taxable Activity [Read Order]
In M/s. Varenyyam Motors vs. CCE & ST, the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) upheld the penalty imposed on the assessee for wrongfully availing credit knowing that ‘...
![CESTAT confirms Penalty as Assessee Wrongfully availed Credit knowing that ‘ Trading Activity ’ was not a Taxable Activity [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Trading-Activity-Credit-Penalty-Taxscan.jpg "CESTAT confirms Penalty as Assessee Wrongfully availed Credit knowing that ‘ Trading Activity ’ was not a Taxable Activity [Read Order]")
Penalty under Section 271B can’t be levied for Failure to get Accounts Audited under Section 44AB: ITAT [Read Order]
In Roshini Devi vs. Income Tax Officer, the Jaipur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) held that penalty under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be levied for non-audit...
![Penalty under Section 271B can’t be levied for Failure to get Accounts Audited under Section 44AB: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/No-Penalty-Taxscan.jpg "Penalty under Section 271B can’t be levied for Failure to get Accounts Audited under Section 44AB: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Offering Income under a Wrong Head would not attract Penalty: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Offering Income under a Wrong Head would not attract Penalty: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Penalty u/s 114 can’t be ground for refusing renewal of Customs Broker License: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Customs-Broker-License-Taxscan.jpg "Penalty u/s 114 can’t be ground for refusing renewal of Customs Broker License: CESTAT [Read Order]")