Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Difference in Address Shown in Invoice and E-way Bill is not a Serious Mistake: Kerala HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/E-way-Bill-HP-Appellate-Authority-Tribunal-Taxscan.jpg "Difference in Address Shown in Invoice and E-way Bill is not a Serious Mistake: Kerala HC [Read Order]")
Difference in Address Shown in Invoice and E-way Bill is not a Serious Mistake: Kerala HC [Read Order]
The Kerala High Court observed that the difference in the address shown in Invoice and E-way bill is just a clerical mistake and not a serious...
![Chhattisgarh HC rejects writ petition of alleged issuer of Fake Invoices [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Fake-Invoices-Chhattisgarh-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Chhattisgarh HC rejects writ petition of alleged issuer of Fake Invoices [Read Order]")
![Taxability of Amount Seized during Demonetization; Madras HC Applauds Govt for Introducing Faceless E-Assessment [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Faceless-E-assessment-Seized-Amount-Cash-Seizure-Taxscan.jpg "Taxability of Amount Seized during Demonetization; Madras HC Applauds Govt for Introducing Faceless E-Assessment [Read Judgment]")
![Securities Exchange is entitled to exercise its Right of Lien on Security Deposits, reiterates Bombay HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Security-Deposits-Bombay-High-Court-Taxscan-1.jpg "Securities Exchange is entitled to exercise its Right of Lien on Security Deposits, reiterates Bombay HC [Read Judgment]")
![Land belonging to Gurudwara which is not categorized as Agricultural Land liable to TDS on Compulsory Acquisition: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Gurudwara-Capital-Asset-Taxscan.jpg "Land belonging to Gurudwara which is not categorized as Agricultural Land liable to TDS on Compulsory Acquisition: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]")
Appeal can't be dismissed for want of Delay if it was due to Non-Receipt of Order-in-Original: Rajasthan HC [Read Judgment]
The Rajasthan High Court held that the petitioner did not have any knowledge of the order had passed against the company but also the copy of the order-in-origin was not received by them. In such...
“The Amendments made in Excise and Service Tax Laws requiring Mandatory Pre-Deposit for filing appeal before the CESTAT is Restrospective”: Madras HC [Read Judgment]
Recently, a writ petition was filed before the Madras High Court, in which the petitioner sought a declaration that Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 83 of the Finance Act,...
