![GST Dept shall Mandatorily grant Right to Hearing to Person against whom an Adverse Order is Passed: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/GST-Dept-Adverse-Order-Allahabad-HC-taxscan.jpeg "GST Dept shall Mandatorily grant Right to Hearing to Person against whom an Adverse Order is Passed: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
GST Dept shall Mandatorily grant Right to Hearing to Person against whom an Adverse Order is Passed: Allahabad HC [Read Order]
A two judge bench of the Allahabad High Court has held that it s the mandatory duty of the GST department to grant an opportunity of hearing to a...
![Income Tax Department can’t carry out any Assessment of Corporate Debtor for the Period Covered by the Resolution Plan: Telangana HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Corporate-Debtor-Telangana-HC.jpg "Income Tax Department can’t carry out any Assessment of Corporate Debtor for the Period Covered by the Resolution Plan: Telangana HC [Read Judgment]")
![Taxpayers eligible to require Copies of Seized Documents during Search: Kerala High Court [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/petitioners-documents-seized-taxscan.jpg "Taxpayers eligible to require Copies of Seized Documents during Search: Kerala High Court [Read Order]")
![Proof of Inability to upload Form GST TRAN-1 due to Technical Errors is Mere Procedure so not Mandatory: Calcutta HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Form-GST-TRAN-1-Taxscan.jpg "Proof of Inability to upload Form GST TRAN-1 due to Technical Errors is Mere Procedure so not Mandatory: Calcutta HC [Read Order]")
Unblocking of E-way bill is possible only If the due Tax Amounts are Remitted: Kerala HC [Read Order]
The Kerala High Court held that the unblocking of the E-way bill is possible only if the due tax amounts are remitted. The petitioners are contractors having registration as Class-'C' and obtained...
![Unblocking of E-way bill is possible only If the due Tax Amounts are Remitted: Kerala HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/E-Way-Bill-Taxscan.jpg "Unblocking of E-way bill is possible only If the due Tax Amounts are Remitted: Kerala HC [Read Order]")
Tripura HC orders State Govt. to grant Reimbursement of VAT as per Tripura Industrial Investment Promotion Incentive Scheme [Read Judgment]
The Tripura High Court has directed the state government to grant reimbursement of Value Added Tax(VAT) as per the State Government Scheme which ensured so for Commercial Productions in the state. ...
![Tripura HC orders State Govt. to grant Reimbursement of VAT as per Tripura Industrial Investment Promotion Incentive Scheme [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/VAT-Reimbursement-Taxscan.jpg "Tripura HC orders State Govt. to grant Reimbursement of VAT as per Tripura Industrial Investment Promotion Incentive Scheme [Read Judgment]")
![No Bar of Appointment of Advocates as Receivers under SARFAESI Act: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/SARFAESI-Act-Delhi-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "No Bar of Appointment of Advocates as Receivers under SARFAESI Act: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
Telangana HC directs to Refund the Service Tax Collected on Purchase of Immovable Property including Undivided Share of Land [Read Judgment]
The Telangana High Court has held that service tax not applicable to the purchase of immovable property including an undivided share of land and also directed to refund the service tax collected. The...
![Telangana HC directs to Refund the Service Tax Collected on Purchase of Immovable Property including Undivided Share of Land [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Refund-Service-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Telangana HC directs to Refund the Service Tax Collected on Purchase of Immovable Property including Undivided Share of Land [Read Judgment]")
Date of Order of CIT(A) considered as Relevant Date for Determining Limitation u/s 150: Delhi HC [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court in the case of Intec Corporation v ACIT held that the period of limitation under Section 150 would be considered from the date of order of CIT (A). The petitioner engaged in the...
![Date of Order of CIT(A) considered as Relevant Date for Determining Limitation u/s 150: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Form-TRAN-1-Delhi-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Date of Order of CIT(A) considered as Relevant Date for Determining Limitation u/s 150: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
Delhi HC validates Section 65(105) (zzzzu) of the Finance Act, 1994; Explanation to Section 65(105)(zzzh) of the Act held as Unconstitutional [Read Judgment]
The Delhi High Court in a recent ruling upheld the validity of section 65(105) (zzzzu) of the Finance Act, 1994, but invalidated the explanation to Section 65(105)(zzzh) of the Act inserted via...
![Delhi HC validates Section 65(105) (zzzzu) of the Finance Act, 1994; Explanation to Section 65(105)(zzzh) of the Act held as Unconstitutional [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Delhi-High-Court-Tax-Scan-1.jpg "Delhi HC validates Section 65(105) (zzzzu) of the Finance Act, 1994; Explanation to Section 65(105)(zzzh) of the Act held as Unconstitutional [Read Judgment]")