![Setback for Royal Enfield: CESTAT Rejects ₹1.79 Cr Refund Claim on SIPCOT Charges Over 31-Day Delay [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Setback-Royal-Enfield-CESTAT-Rejects-Refund-Claim-SIPCOT-taxscan.jpg "Setback for Royal Enfield: CESTAT Rejects ₹1.79 Cr Refund Claim on SIPCOT Charges Over 31-Day Delay [Read Order]")
Setback for Royal Enfield: CESTAT Rejects ₹1.79 Cr Refund Claim on SIPCOT Charges Over 31-Day Delay [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that Royal Enfield Motors’ claim for refund of Rs. 1.79...
![Date of Cenvat Credit Refund Claim is to be taken as Date on which Original Refund Claim was Acknowledged by Excise Dept: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Cenvat-Credit-Refund-Claim-Excise-Dept-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Date of Cenvat Credit Refund Claim is to be taken as Date on which Original Refund Claim was Acknowledged by Excise Dept: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![CESTAT upholds Duty Valuation under Rule 10A, Rejects Vehicle Manufacturers appeal on Refund Claim [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-Duty-Valuation-Vehicle-Manufacturer-appeal-Refund-Claim-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT upholds Duty Valuation under Rule 10A, Rejects Vehicle Manufacturers appeal on Refund Claim [Read Order]")
![CESTAT allows Refund Claim to be Filed with Service recipients Jurisdictional Officer based on Retrospective Exemption [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CESTAT-Refund-Claim-recipient-Jurisdictional-Officer-Retrospective-Exemption-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT allows Refund Claim to be Filed with Service recipients Jurisdictional Officer based on Retrospective Exemption [Read Order]")
![CESTAT allows Refund of Service Tax Paid on Cancelled Bookings of Flats [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/CESTAT-Refund-Service-Tax-Cancelled-Bookings-Flats-taxscan.webp "CESTAT allows Refund of Service Tax Paid on Cancelled Bookings of Flats [Read Order]")
![Refund Claim U/s 42 DVAT Act delayed: Delhi HC directs to Pay Simple Interest @ 6% [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Refund-Claim-DVAT-Act-delayed-Delhi-HC-Pay-Simple-Interest-taxsan.jpg "Refund Claim U/s 42 DVAT Act delayed: Delhi HC directs to Pay Simple Interest @ 6% [Read Order]")
Appropriation of Refund Claim against Disputed Pending Excise Appeal is not Valid without Finality of Order: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Allahabad bench of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) held that appropriation of a refund claim against a disputed pending excise appeal is not valid without the...
![Appropriation of Refund Claim against Disputed Pending Excise Appeal is not Valid without Finality of Order: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/CESTAT-CESTAT-Allahabad-Refund-Excise-Appeal-TAXSCAN.jpg "Appropriation of Refund Claim against Disputed Pending Excise Appeal is not Valid without Finality of Order: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Period of Limitation u/s 27(1B) shall apply when Refund Claim of Importer Duty paid under Protest: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ruled that the period of limitation under Section 27(1B) should apply when the refund claim of importer duty was paid under...
![Period of Limitation u/s 27(1B) shall apply when Refund Claim of Importer Duty paid under Protest: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/CESTAT-Chennai-Import-duty-Refund-Claim-of-Importer-Duty-Refund-Claim-Duty-paid-under-protest-TAXSCAN.jpg "Period of Limitation u/s 27(1B) shall apply when Refund Claim of Importer Duty paid under Protest: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Compliance of Condition in Excise Notification by Filing RT-12 returns Regularly: CESTAT sets aside Order Rejecting Refund [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) set aside order rejecting refund as there was compliance of condition in the excise notification by filing RT-12...
![Compliance of Condition in Excise Notification by Filing RT-12 returns Regularly: CESTAT sets aside Order Rejecting Refund [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/CESTAT-Kolkata-Filing-RT-12-returns-RT-12-returns-Excise-Notification-compliance-Excise-Notification-RT-12-Taxscan.jpg "Compliance of Condition in Excise Notification by Filing RT-12 returns Regularly: CESTAT sets aside Order Rejecting Refund [Read Order]")
Rejection of Refund Claim of Excess Customs Duty: CESTAT upholds ITAT's Order for Reassessment of Bill of Entry [Read Order]
The Bangalore bench of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) upheld the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for reassessment of the bill of entry rejection of...
![Rejection of Refund Claim of Excess Customs Duty: CESTAT upholds ITATs Order for Reassessment of Bill of Entry [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/CESTAT-Refund-Claim-of-Excess-Customs-Duty-Reassessment-of-Bill-of-Entry-itat-taxscan.jpg "Rejection of Refund Claim of Excess Customs Duty: CESTAT upholds ITATs Order for Reassessment of Bill of Entry [Read Order]")
Rejection of Excise Duty Refund claim deposited under Protest is liable to be Refunded: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), observed that the rejection of excise duty refund claim deposited under protest is liable to be refunded. ...
![Rejection of Excise Duty Refund claim deposited under Protest is liable to be Refunded: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Rejection-Excise-Duty-Refund-claim-Protest-Refunded-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Rejection of Excise Duty Refund claim deposited under Protest is liable to be Refunded: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Jurisdiction to consider Application u/s 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act, is not vested with Chief Commissioner of Income Tax as Refund claim being above 10 Lakhs: Kerala HC [Read Order]
The Kerala High Court observed that the Jurisdiction to consider application under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is not vested with Chief Commissioner of Income Tax as the refund...
![Jurisdiction to consider Application u/s 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act, is not vested with Chief Commissioner of Income Tax as Refund claim being above 10 Lakhs: Kerala HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Kerala-High-Court-Chief-Commissioner-of-Income-Tax-Tax-jurisdiction-Refund-claim-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Jurisdiction to consider Application u/s 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act, is not vested with Chief Commissioner of Income Tax as Refund claim being above 10 Lakhs: Kerala HC [Read Order]")