![Relief to Punjab and Sind Bank: Delhi HC allows Refund of Rs.1.3 crores Deposited by Bank on ground of Involvement of Public Funds [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Relief-Punjab-Sind-Bank-Delhi-HC-Refund-Deposited-Bank-ground-Involvement-Public-Funds-TAXSCAN.jpg "Relief to Punjab and Sind Bank: Delhi HC allows Refund of Rs.1.3 crores Deposited by Bank on ground of Involvement of Public Funds [Read Order]")
Relief to Punjab and Sind Bank: Delhi HC allows Refund of Rs.1.3 crores Deposited by Bank on ground of Involvement of Public Funds [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court granted relief to the Punjab and Sind Bank by allowing the refund of the amount Rs. 1,36,04,250/- deposited by the bank on the...
![Relief to Max Life Insurance: Delhi HC directs Income Tax Dept to Refund Rs 221 Crores of Excess Outstanding Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Relief-to-Max-Life-Insurance-Max-Life-Insurance-Delhi-High-Court-Income-Tax-Department-Refund-Excess-Outstanding-Demand-Outstanding-Demand-Demand-Income-Tax-Dept-to-Refund-Rs-221-Crores-Taxscan.jpg "Relief to Max Life Insurance: Delhi HC directs Income Tax Dept to Refund Rs 221 Crores of Excess Outstanding Demand [Read Order]")
![AO cant Withhold DVAT Refund Towards Demand Which are not Recoverable: Delhi HC directs to Refund Amount [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/DVAT-Refund-DVAT-Refund-DVAT-Refund-Towards-Demand-Which-are-not-Recoverable-not-Recoverable-Delhi-High-Court-Refund-Amount-Taxscan.jpg "AO cant Withhold DVAT Refund Towards Demand Which are not Recoverable: Delhi HC directs to Refund Amount [Read Order]")
![Refund of Balance Unutilised Cenvat Credit of Sold Factory is not Allowable: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Refund-Refund-of-Balance-Unutilised-Cenvat-Credit-of-Sold-Factory-Cenvat-Credit-Sold-Factory-Cenvat-Credit-of-Sold-Factory-is-not-Allowable-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Refund of Balance Unutilised Cenvat Credit of Sold Factory is not Allowable: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Tax Dept Rejected Refund Application Stating They can Keep it in Abeyance Until An appeal Filed: Patna HC Deprecates Conduct of State Tax Authority and Restores Application [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Patna High Court deprecates the conduct of state tax authorities in rejecting refund applications stating they can keep it in abeyance until an appeal is filed and restored...
![Tax Dept Rejected Refund Application Stating They can Keep it in Abeyance Until An appeal Filed: Patna HC Deprecates Conduct of State Tax Authority and Restores Application [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Tax-Dept-Tax-Tax-Dept-Rejected-Refund-Application-Refund-Refund-Application-Patna-High-Court-Patna-High-Court-Deprecates-Conduct-of-State-Tax-Authority-Taxscan.jpg "Tax Dept Rejected Refund Application Stating They can Keep it in Abeyance Until An appeal Filed: Patna HC Deprecates Conduct of State Tax Authority and Restores Application [Read Order]")
Nirma Ltd. entitles to Additional Compensation for Delay in Issuing Refund u/s 244A of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]
The Ahemdabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the amount of refund granted to the assessee, first, has to be adjusted against the interest payable to the assessee and thus...
![Nirma Ltd. entitles to Additional Compensation for Delay in Issuing Refund u/s 244A of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Nirma-0Ltd-Additional-Compensation-Delay-Refund-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Nirma Ltd. entitles to Additional Compensation for Delay in Issuing Refund u/s 244A of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
Bombay HC directs to Refund Amount Attached from Assessee in Absence of Proven Offence u/s 9(1) (b ) of FERA Act [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court directed to refund the amount attached from the assessee in the absence of proven offence under section 9(1) (b ) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA). Shri...
![Bombay HC directs to Refund Amount Attached from Assessee in Absence of Proven Offence u/s 9(1) (b ) of FERA Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Bombay-HC-directs-to-Refund-Amount-Assessee-in-Absence-of-Proven-Offence-Refund-Refund-Amount-Bombay-High-Court-FERA-Act-taxscan.jpg "Bombay HC directs to Refund Amount Attached from Assessee in Absence of Proven Offence u/s 9(1) (b ) of FERA Act [Read Order]")
Relief to Savita Oil Technologies, Refund Allowable on Excess Duty Paid Due to Extending Quantity Discount to Customers: CESTAT [Read Order]
As a relief to Savita Oil Technologies Limited, the Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) refund is allowable on excess duty paid due to extending...
![Relief to Savita Oil Technologies, Refund Allowable on Excess Duty Paid Due to Extending Quantity Discount to Customers: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Relief-to-Savita-Oil-Technologies-Refund-Allowable-on-Excess-Duty-Extending-Quantity-Discount-to-Customers-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Relief to Savita Oil Technologies, Refund Allowable on Excess Duty Paid Due to Extending Quantity Discount to Customers: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Demand of Excess Refund Amount of Custom Duty on Inputs Lost in Fire based on Mere presumption: CESTAT quashes Order [Read Order]
The Chandigarh bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the demand for an excess refund amount of customs duty on inputs lost in fire based on mere...
![Demand of Excess Refund Amount of Custom Duty on Inputs Lost in Fire based on Mere presumption: CESTAT quashes Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Demand-of-Excess-Refund-Amount-Excess-Refund-Amount-Demand-Custom-Duty-on-Inputs-Lost-in-Fire-CESTAT-Quashes-Order-taxscan.jpg "Demand of Excess Refund Amount of Custom Duty on Inputs Lost in Fire based on Mere presumption: CESTAT quashes Order [Read Order]")