![Revenue Department cannot Seize Cash that does not form Part of Stock in Trade in GST case: SC upholds Decision of Kerala HC [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Revenue-Department-Seize-Stock-Trade-GST-SC-Decision-Kerala-highcourt-TAXSCAN.jpg "Revenue Department cannot Seize Cash that does not form Part of Stock in Trade in GST case: SC upholds Decision of Kerala HC [Read Judgement]")
Revenue Department cannot Seize Cash that does not form Part of Stock in Trade in GST case: SC upholds Decision of Kerala HC [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court of India upheld the decision of the Kerala High Court in Shabu George vs State Tax Officer wherein it was held that Revenue...
![Sanctioned Refund Claim can be Adjusted to Any Dues of Excise Duty as per Section 11 of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Sanctioned-Refund-Claim-can-be-Adjusted-to-Any-Dues-of-Excise-Duty-Refund-Claim-Dues-of-Excise-Duty-Excise-Duty-Central-Excise-Act-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Sanctioned Refund Claim can be Adjusted to Any Dues of Excise Duty as per Section 11 of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Payment Received by Colgate Palmolive Malaysia from Colgate India to Access SAP System is not ’Royalty; Not Taxable: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Payment-Received-by-Colgate-Palmolive-Malaysia-from-Colgate-India-Colgate-Palmolive-Malaysia-Colgate-Colgate-India-Bombay-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Payment Received by Colgate Palmolive Malaysia from Colgate India to Access SAP System is not ’Royalty; Not Taxable: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
![Penalty u/s 96ZP of Excise Act not justifiable when Revenue Department delayed Computation of ACP: Orissa HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Penalty-Excise-Act-Revenue-Department-ACP-Orissa-HC-TAXSCAN.jpg "Penalty u/s 96ZP of Excise Act not justifiable when Revenue Department delayed Computation of ACP: Orissa HC [Read Order]")
Payment of 25% of Penalty is adequate to Compensate Revenue Department: CESTAT sets aside Penalty under Rule 15(2) of CENVAT Credit Rules [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) while setting aside the penalty under Rule 15(2) of CENVAT Credit Rules has held that payment of 25% of the...
![Payment of 25% of Penalty is adequate to Compensate Revenue Department: CESTAT sets aside Penalty under Rule 15(2) of CENVAT Credit Rules [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Payment-Revenue-Department-CESTAT-Penalty-CENVAT-Credit-Rules-taxscan.jpg "Payment of 25% of Penalty is adequate to Compensate Revenue Department: CESTAT sets aside Penalty under Rule 15(2) of CENVAT Credit Rules [Read Order]")
![ÂÂRoyalty Expenditure is Revenue in Nature, Taxable: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Royalty-Expenditure-Revenue-Taxable-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "ÂÂRoyalty Expenditure is Revenue in Nature, Taxable: ITAT [Read Order]")
Deliberate Delay in filing Appeal and Deposit of Fee under Wrong Head: ITAT upholds Dismissal of Appeal [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the deliberate delay in filing an appeal and depositing of appeal fee under the wrong head would show the irresponsible and...
![Deliberate Delay in filing Appeal and Deposit of Fee under Wrong Head: ITAT upholds Dismissal of Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Deliberate-Delay-Deposit-of-Fee-ITAT-Appeal-Taxscan.jpeg "Deliberate Delay in filing Appeal and Deposit of Fee under Wrong Head: ITAT upholds Dismissal of Appeal [Read Order]")
ITAT adopts Principles of Consistency and uniformity on Co-owners subjected differently by Revenue Dept. [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Hyderabad adopted the principle of consistency and uniformity on co-owners who were subjected differently by the Revenue Department as the department denied...
![ITAT adopts Principles of Consistency and uniformity on Co-owners subjected differently by Revenue Dept. [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/ITAT-principles-of-consistency-Revenue-Department-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT adopts Principles of Consistency and uniformity on Co-owners subjected differently by Revenue Dept. [Read Order]")
![ITAT deletes Capital Gain brought to tax under 50C [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/ITAT-Capital-Gain-Tax-50C-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT deletes Capital Gain brought to tax under 50C [Read Order]")
Customs Duty Evasion: Patiala House Court refuses to grant Anticipatory Bail to person allegedly involved in Duty evasion of about Rs.13 Cr [Read Order]
The Patiala House Court refused to grant anticipatory bail to the person allegedly involved in Custom duty evasion of about Rs.13 Crores. The applicant Vishesh Jain is the proprietor of M/s...
![Customs Duty Evasion: Patiala House Court refuses to grant Anticipatory Bail to person allegedly involved in Duty evasion of about Rs.13 Cr [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/District-Court-Customs-Duty-Evasion-Patiala-House-Court-grant-Anticipatory-Bail-Duty-evasion-Taxscan.jpg "Customs Duty Evasion: Patiala House Court refuses to grant Anticipatory Bail to person allegedly involved in Duty evasion of about Rs.13 Cr [Read Order]")
Striking off the Name of Company from RoC can’t impact Assessment if no documents submitted to strike off the name from Income Tax Department: Madras HC
The Madras High Court while allowing the appeal in the favour of the revenue department held that the striking of the name of Company from the Register of Companies can not impact assessment if no...
