![Entry and Variable Annual Licence Fees Paid to Telecom Department is Capital in Nature, Amortisation Permitted u/s 35ABB of Income Tax Act: Supreme Court [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Entry-Variable-Annual-Licence-Fees-Paid-Telecom-Department-Capital-in-Nature-Amortisation-Permitted-Income-Tax-Act-Supreme-Court-TAXSCAN.jpg "Entry and Variable Annual Licence Fees Paid to Telecom Department is Capital in Nature, Amortisation Permitted u/s 35ABB of Income Tax Act: Supreme Court [Read Order]")
Entry and Variable Annual Licence Fees Paid to Telecom Department is Capital in Nature, Amortisation Permitted u/s 35ABB of Income Tax Act: Supreme Court [Read Order]
In a significant Supreme Court ruling, the bench of Justice B. V. Nagarathna and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan declared that the entry and variable annual...
![Failure to produce Book of accounts during Assessment Proceedings due to communication gap between Assessees Representative and Company: ITAT directs Re adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Failure-to-produce-Book-accounts-Assessment-Proceedings-communication-between-Assessees-Representative-Company-ITAT-directs-Re-adjudication-TAXSCAN.jpg "Failure to produce Book of accounts during Assessment Proceedings due to communication gap between Assessees Representative and Company: ITAT directs Re adjudication [Read Order]")
![Action taken by AO cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interest of revenue unless it is unsustainable in Law: ITAT quashes Revision Order for lack of Jurisdiction [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/AO-Action-taken-by-AO-Action-taken-by-AO-cannot-be-treated-as-prejudicial-to-the-interest-of-revenue-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Action taken by AO cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interest of revenue unless it is unsustainable in Law: ITAT quashes Revision Order for lack of Jurisdiction [Read Order]")
Non delivery of possession to the purchaser by the date of filing of suit proves provisions U/S 2(47) not being applicable: ITAT upholds order of CIT(A) [Read Order]
The Pune bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no provisions under Section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act is attracted as neither the entire sale consideration was paid by the...
![Non delivery of possession to the purchaser by the date of filing of suit proves provisions U/S 2(47) not being applicable: ITAT upholds order of CIT(A) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Non-delivery-possession-purchaser-date-of-filing-suit-proves-provisions-applicable-ITAT-order-CITA-TAXSCAN.jpg "Non delivery of possession to the purchaser by the date of filing of suit proves provisions U/S 2(47) not being applicable: ITAT upholds order of CIT(A) [Read Order]")
Every loss of Revenue as a Consequence of Order of AO cannot be Treated as Prejudicial to Interests of Revenue: ITAT Quashes Revision order u/s 263 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]
The Jaipur Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed the revision order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act 1961, holding that every loss of revenue as a consequence of the order...
![Every loss of Revenue as a Consequence of Order of AO cannot be Treated as Prejudicial to Interests of Revenue: ITAT Quashes Revision order u/s 263 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Every-loss-of-Revenue-as-a-Consequence-of-Order-of-AO-Treated-as-Prejudicial-to-Interests-of-Revenue-ITAT-Quashes-Revision-order-TAXSCAN.jpg "Every loss of Revenue as a Consequence of Order of AO cannot be Treated as Prejudicial to Interests of Revenue: ITAT Quashes Revision order u/s 263 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
No Rejection of Refund Claim of Cenvat Credit of Service Tax which Already Accepted by Revenue: CESTAT Directs Re-adjudication
The Chandigarh Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has directed re-adjudication holding that refund of Cenvat credit of service tax which is already accepted by the revenue...
No Consumer Complaint entertainable against Revenue for Levy of Excess GST by Hotel Managements: Madras HC [Read Order]
A Single Bench of the Madras High Court held that consumer complaints are not maintainable against revenue and the Goods and Services Tax (GST) department for levy of excess GST by Hotel Managements....
![No Consumer Complaint entertainable against Revenue for Levy of Excess GST by Hotel Managements: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/No-Consumer-Complaint-entertainable-Revenue-for-Levy-Excess-GST-Hotel-Managements-Madras-HC-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Consumer Complaint entertainable against Revenue for Levy of Excess GST by Hotel Managements: Madras HC [Read Order]")
Customs Duty payable in Advance for days of New Retail Price or Closed Production, Claim to be filed later: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that customs duty payable in advance for days of new retail price. The production of a new retail...
![Customs Duty payable in Advance for days of New Retail Price or Closed Production, Claim to be filed later: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Customs-Duty-payable-Advance-for-days-New-Retail-Price-Closed-Production-Claim-to-be-filed-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Customs Duty payable in Advance for days of New Retail Price or Closed Production, Claim to be filed later: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Kerala HC directs to Consider Interim Stay order before Income Tax Recovery Proceeding [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Kerala-HC-directs-Consider-Interim-Stay-before-Income-Tax-Recovery-Proceeding-TAXSCAN.jpg "Kerala HC directs to Consider Interim Stay order before Income Tax Recovery Proceeding [Read Order]")
![Reopening of Assessment without Valid Jurisdiction: ITAT Dismisses Revenue Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Reopening-Assessment-Valid-Jurisdiction-ITAT-Revenue-Appeal-TAXSCAN.jpg "Reopening of Assessment without Valid Jurisdiction: ITAT Dismisses Revenue Appeal [Read Order]")