![No abnormal jump in cash sales during Demonitization Period: ITAT Deletes Income Tax Addition u/s 68 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/No-abnorma-l-jump-cash-sales-Demonitization-Period-ITAT-Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "No abnormal jump in cash sales during Demonitization Period: ITAT Deletes Income Tax Addition u/s 68 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
No 'abnormal jump' in cash sales during Demonitization Period: ITAT Deletes Income Tax Addition u/s 68 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that there is no abnormal jump in cash sales during demonetization period and all these...
![CBIC Chairman releases e-compendium of Pro-Revenue CESTAT Case Laws [Read Notification]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/CBIC-CBIC-Chairman-CBIC-Chairman-releases-e-compendium-e-compendium-Pro-Revenue-CESTAT-CESTAT-Case-Laws-taxscan-1.jpg "CBIC Chairman releases e-compendium of Pro-Revenue CESTAT Case Laws [Read Notification]")
![Income Tax Addition u/s 69B of Income Tax Act made on basis of Cogent Documentation: ITAT Dismisses Income Tax Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Income-Tax-Income-Act-Cogent-Documentation-ITAT-Income-Tax-Appeal-TAXSCAN.jpg "Income Tax Addition u/s 69B of Income Tax Act made on basis of Cogent Documentation: ITAT Dismisses Income Tax Appeal [Read Order]")
![No Addition shall be made, if assessee has sufficient interest free fund to provide interest free loans: ITAT dismisses revenues Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/No-Addition-if-assessee-sufficient-interest-fund-provide-interest-free-loans-ITAT-revenue-Appeal-taxscan.jpg "No Addition shall be made, if assessee has sufficient interest free fund to provide interest free loans: ITAT dismisses revenues Appeal [Read Order]")
![Not a case of Irreparable Loss when Party can be Compensated in terms of Money: Kerala HC upholds Payment of 30% of Disputed Tax under KVAT Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Not-case-Irreparable-Loss-Party-Compensated-Money-Kerala-HC-Payment-Disputed-Tax-KVAT-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Not a case of Irreparable Loss when Party can be Compensated in terms of Money: Kerala HC upholds Payment of 30% of Disputed Tax under KVAT Act [Read Order]")
Levy of Late Fees u/s 234E of Income Tax Act for Filing Delayed Previous TDS Return: Kerala HC quashes Intimation Order [Read Order]
The Kerala High Court quashed the intimation order issued under the Income Tax Act, 1961 in the matter of levy of late fees under Section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for filing delayed previous...
![Levy of Late Fees u/s 234E of Income Tax Act for Filing Delayed Previous TDS Return: Kerala HC quashes Intimation Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Levy-late-fees-Income-Tax-Act-filing-previous-TDS-return-Kerala-HC-intimation-order-TAXSCAN.jpg "Levy of Late Fees u/s 234E of Income Tax Act for Filing Delayed Previous TDS Return: Kerala HC quashes Intimation Order [Read Order]")
No Commencement of Commercial Production of Aluminium, Benefit of Excise Notification not Allowable: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that benefit of excise notification not allowable in absence of commencement of commercial...
![No Commencement of Commercial Production of Aluminium, Benefit of Excise Notification not Allowable: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/No-Commencement-Commercial-Production-Aluminium-Benefit-Excise-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Commencement of Commercial Production of Aluminium, Benefit of Excise Notification not Allowable: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Rule 8 of Chewing Tobacco and Unmanufactured Tobacco Packing Machine Rules 2010 not Ultravires to Section 3A of CEA: Delhi HC [Read Order]
A Division Bench of the Delhi High Court ruled that Rule 8 of Chewing Tobacco and Unmanufactured Tobacco Packing Machine (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Rules 2010 (CTUT) not...
Deduction Allowable on Warranty expenses of motor vehicles ascertained based on actual expenses incurred on settlement of warranty schemes in earlier years: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai bench held that deduction allowable on warranty expenses of motor vehicles was ascertained based on the actual expenses incurred on settlement of...
![Deduction Allowable on Warranty expenses of motor vehicles ascertained based on actual expenses incurred on settlement of warranty schemes in earlier years: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Deduction-Warranty-expenses-motor-vehicles-ascertained-actual-expenses-settlement-warranty-schemes-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Deduction Allowable on Warranty expenses of motor vehicles ascertained based on actual expenses incurred on settlement of warranty schemes in earlier years: ITAT [Read Order]")
Addition u/s 69A can't be made on basis of Unsigned and Unexecuted Draft of Agreement to Sale found in Soft Copy from Third Party Premises: ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the addition under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be made on the basis of an unsigned and unexecuted draft of an...
![Addition u/s 69A cant be made on basis of Unsigned and Unexecuted Draft of Agreement to Sale found in Soft Copy from Third Party Premises: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Addition-Unsigned-Unexecuted-Draft-Agreement-Sale-found-Soft-Copy-Third-Party-Premises-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Addition u/s 69A cant be made on basis of Unsigned and Unexecuted Draft of Agreement to Sale found in Soft Copy from Third Party Premises: ITAT [Read Order]")
Revenue Fails to Substantiate Allegation of Clandestine Removal of Scrap: CESTAT sets aside SCN Demanding Excise Duty [Read Order]
The Chandigarh bench of the Customs Excise and Service Tax (CESTAT) set aside the show cause notice (SCN) demanding excise duty as the revenue failed to Substantiate allegation of clandestine removal...
![Revenue Fails to Substantiate Allegation of Clandestine Removal of Scrap: CESTAT sets aside SCN Demanding Excise Duty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Revenue-Revenue-Fails-to-Substantiate-Allegation-Allegation-Clandestine-Removal-of-Scrap-Revenue-Fails-to-Substantiate-Allegation-of-Clandestine-Removal-of-Scrap-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Revenue Fails to Substantiate Allegation of Clandestine Removal of Scrap: CESTAT sets aside SCN Demanding Excise Duty [Read Order]")
Capital Gain Deduction u/s 54 Allowable in the Year of Handing Over of Possession, not in the Year of Payment of Consideration: ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the capital gain deduction under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 could be allowable in the year of handing over of...
![Capital Gain Deduction u/s 54 Allowable in the Year of Handing Over of Possession, not in the Year of Payment of Consideration: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Capital-Gain-Deduction-Year-Handing-Possession-Year-Payment-Consideration-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Capital Gain Deduction u/s 54 Allowable in the Year of Handing Over of Possession, not in the Year of Payment of Consideration: ITAT [Read Order]")