![ITAT grants Trust Second chance to Prove Genuineness of Activities, remands Registration Application to CIT(E) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ITAT-ITAT-Jaipur-remands-Registration-Genuineness-of-Activities-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT grants Trust Second chance to Prove Genuineness of Activities, remands Registration Application to CIT(E) [Read Order]")
ITAT grants Trust Second chance to Prove Genuineness of Activities, remands Registration Application to CIT(E) [Read Order]
The Jaipur Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) granted Trust a second chance to prove the genuineness of its activities and...
![Sale Consideration as determined by Stamp Duty Authorities has to be adopted for purposes of Computation of Capital Gain: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/ITAT-Jaipur-ITAT-Income-Tax-ITAT-Ruling-on-Capital-Gains-Stamp-Duty-Authority-Valuation-Taxscan.jpg "Sale Consideration as determined by Stamp Duty Authorities has to be adopted for purposes of Computation of Capital Gain: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Ex-Parte order passed for Non-Appearance of Assessee: ITAT grants another opportunity giving relief to Oriental Bank [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Oriental-Bank-site-img.jpg "Ex-Parte order passed for Non-Appearance of Assessee: ITAT grants another opportunity giving relief to Oriental Bank [Read Order]")
![ITAT directs Deposit of Cost of Rs. 2,000 in PM Relief Fund for Failure to Cooperate Before Appellate Authority in Respect of Penalty Proceedings [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/ITAT-directs-Deposit-ITAT-Deposit-PM-Relief-Fund-Appellate-Authority-Penalty-Proceedings-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT directs Deposit of Cost of Rs. 2,000 in PM Relief Fund for Failure to Cooperate Before Appellate Authority in Respect of Penalty Proceedings [Read Order]")
![Failure to file ITR bonafidely and witness no Loss to Revenue as Proper Tax was already Paid: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Failure-file-ITR-Loss-Revenue-Proper-Tax-already-Paid-ITAT-Penalty-taxscan-.jpg "Failure to file ITR bonafidely and witness no Loss to Revenue as Proper Tax was already Paid: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]")
Non Compliance of notices amounts to disregard of Quasi-Judicial Authority: ITAT directs deposit of cost on PM care Fund [Read Order]
The Jaipur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) directed assessee to deposit cost on Prime Minister Care Fund due to non compliance of notices and held that it...
![Non Compliance of notices amounts to disregard of Quasi-Judicial Authority: ITAT directs deposit of cost on PM care Fund [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Non-Compliance-notices-amounts-disregard-Quasi-�Judicial-Authority-ITAT-deposit-cost-PM-Fund-TAXSCAN.jpg "Non Compliance of notices amounts to disregard of Quasi-Judicial Authority: ITAT directs deposit of cost on PM care Fund [Read Order]")
Reference made to TPO u/s 92CA of IT Act due to Omission of Law without Saving Clause for Pending Proceedings: ITAT quashes Order [Read Order]
The Jaipur bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the reference made to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) under section 92CA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 due to omission of law...
![Reference made to TPO u/s 92CA of IT Act due to Omission of Law without Saving Clause for Pending Proceedings: ITAT quashes Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/TPO-IT-Act-Omission-of-Law-without-Saving-Clause-for-Pending-Proceedings-Omission-of-Law-Pending-Proceedings-ITAT-quashes-Order-ITAT-Order-Taxscan.jpg "Reference made to TPO u/s 92CA of IT Act due to Omission of Law without Saving Clause for Pending Proceedings: ITAT quashes Order [Read Order]")
Employees of Ajmer Vidhyut Vitran Nigam are not State or Central Government Employees: ITAT denies Exemption u/s 10(10AA) of IT Act [Read Order]
The Jaipur Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has denied exemption under Section 10(10AA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as the employee of Ajmer Vidhyut Vitran Nigam could not be regarded as...
![Employees of Ajmer Vidhyut Vitran Nigam are not State or Central Government Employees: ITAT denies Exemption u/s 10(10AA) of IT Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Employees-of-Ajmer-Vidhyut-Vitran-Nigam-Central-Government-Employees-ITAT-denies-Exemption-ITAT-IT-Act-taxscan.jpg "Employees of Ajmer Vidhyut Vitran Nigam are not State or Central Government Employees: ITAT denies Exemption u/s 10(10AA) of IT Act [Read Order]")
Activities carried out by Rajasthan Para-Medical Council not Commercial, Liable for Registration u/S 12AA of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]
The Jaipur bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has recently held that activities carried out by Rajasthan Para-Medical Council are not commercial hence they should be liable for...
![Activities carried out by Rajasthan Para-Medical Council not Commercial, Liable for Registration u/S 12AA of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Rajasthan-Para-Medical-Council-Registration-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Activities carried out by Rajasthan Para-Medical Council not Commercial, Liable for Registration u/S 12AA of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
Amount paid for Acquiring Title of Property under Dispute shall be Treated as Expenditure for Transfer of Property: ITAT [Read Order]
The Jaipur Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the amount paid for acquiring the title of the property under dispute would be treated as expenditure for transfer of property. ...
![Amount paid for Acquiring Title of Property under Dispute shall be Treated as Expenditure for Transfer of Property: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Amount-Title-of-Property-Expenditure-Transfer-of-Property-Income-Tax-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Amount paid for Acquiring Title of Property under Dispute shall be Treated as Expenditure for Transfer of Property: ITAT [Read Order]")
Penal Provisions of S. 271AAB and 115BBE cannot Attract Once Search Addition and Amount declared u/s 132(4) Accepted by Assessee: ITAT [Read Order]
The Jaipur bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) recently held that penal provisions of section 271AAB and section 115 BBE could not be attracted if once search addition and amount has been...
![Penal Provisions of S. 271AAB and 115BBE cannot Attract Once Search Addition and Amount declared u/s 132(4) Accepted by Assessee: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Search-Addition-Assessee-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Penal Provisions of S. 271AAB and 115BBE cannot Attract Once Search Addition and Amount declared u/s 132(4) Accepted by Assessee: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Registration of Charitable Trust cannot be Cancelled with Retrospective Effect: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Registration-Registration-of-Charitable-Trust-Retrospective-Effect-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Registration of Charitable Trust cannot be Cancelled with Retrospective Effect: ITAT [Read Order]")