![Sufficient Evidences adduced to allege Clandestine Removal: CESTAT upholds Penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/allege-Clandestine-Removal-CESTAT-upholds-Penalty-Central-Excise-Rules-Clandestine-Removal-upholds-Penalty-CESTAT-CESTAT-News-Excise-Customs-Service-Tax-Tax-News-TAXSCAN.jpg "Sufficient Evidences adduced to allege Clandestine Removal: CESTAT upholds Penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules [Read Order]")
Sufficient Evidences adduced to allege Clandestine Removal: CESTAT upholds Penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules [Read Order]
The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), upheld the penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules,...
![CESTAT is not competent to Condone Delay in filing of Appeal before First Appellate Authority beyond 30 Days: CESTAT Dismisses Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/CESTAT-not-competent-to-condone-Delay-filing-of-Appeal-before-First-Appellate-Authority-First-Appellate-Authority-filing-of-Appeal-CESTAT-Dismisses-Appeal-CESTAT-News-Excise-Customs-Service-Tax-TAXSCAN.jpg "CESTAT is not competent to Condone Delay in filing of Appeal before First Appellate Authority beyond 30 Days: CESTAT Dismisses Appeal [Read Order]")
![Non-compliance of Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedure Rules: CESTAT quashes appeal for non-prosecution [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Non-compliance-of-Rule-CESTAT-Procedure-Rules-CESTAT-quashes-appeal-for-non-prosecution-TAXSCAN.jpg "Non-compliance of Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedure Rules: CESTAT quashes appeal for non-prosecution [Read Order]")
![Relief to Pathanjali Trust:CESTAT Directs Re-computation of Service Tax Demand for period 01.10.2006 to 31.03.2007 on ground of Absence of Certificate of CA [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Relief-Pathanjali-Trust-CESTAT-Directs-Re-computation-Service-Tax-Demand-ground-Absence-Certificate-of-CA-taxscan.jpg "Relief to Pathanjali Trust:CESTAT Directs Re-computation of Service Tax Demand for period 01.10.2006 to 31.03.2007 on ground of Absence of Certificate of CA [Read Order]")
![Activity of Yoga Falls under ‘Health and Fitness Services’ Attracts Service Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Activity-Yoga-Falls-Health-Fitness-Services-Attracts-Service-Tax-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Activity of Yoga Falls under ‘Health and Fitness Services’ Attracts Service Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]")
CESTAT upholds Appox. 4.94 Crores Service Tax Demand on Yoga Teaching Service against Patanjali Trust for period 01.04.2007 to 31.03.2011 due to Violation of section 68 of Finance Act [Read Order]
The Allahabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) upheld the service tax demand of approximately 4.94 crores on yoga teaching services rendered by the Patanjali...
![CESTAT upholds Appox. 4.94 Crores Service Tax Demand on Yoga Teaching Service against Patanjali Trust for period 01.04.2007 to 31.03.2011 due to Violation of section 68 of Finance Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/CESTAT-Service-Tax-Demand-Yoga-Finance-Act-Trust-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT upholds Appox. 4.94 Crores Service Tax Demand on Yoga Teaching Service against Patanjali Trust for period 01.04.2007 to 31.03.2011 due to Violation of section 68 of Finance Act [Read Order]")
CESTAT Upholds Penalty u/s 77 of Finance Act for Failure to Take Registration in Accordance with Section 69 of Finance Act [Read Order]
The Allahabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) upheld the penalty imposed under section 77 of the Finance Act,1994 for failure to take registration in...
![CESTAT Upholds Penalty u/s 77 of Finance Act for Failure to Take Registration in Accordance with Section 69 of Finance Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/CESTAT-Penalty-Finance-Act-Registration-Accordance-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Upholds Penalty u/s 77 of Finance Act for Failure to Take Registration in Accordance with Section 69 of Finance Act [Read Order]")
CESTAT Quashes Excise Duty Demand on Clandestine Production and Removal of Copper Tubes on ground of Absence of Corroborative Evidence
The Allahabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the central excise duty demand imposed on the clandestine production and removal of copper tubes on the...
SEZ Act Overrides Procedural Lapses or Conditions in Tax Notifications under Finance Act: SEZ Units Eligible for Tax Exemptions for Authorized Operations within SEZ: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad bench has reaffirmed the supremacy of the Special Economic Zones (SEZ) Act, 2005, over other tax laws, stating that...
![SEZ Act Overrides Procedural Lapses or Conditions in Tax Notifications under Finance Act: SEZ Units Eligible for Tax Exemptions for Authorized Operations within SEZ: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/SEZ-Act-Overrides-Procedural-Lapses-Conditions-in-Tax-Notifications-under-Finance-Act-SEZ-Units-Eligible-for-Tax-Exemptions-for-Authorized-Operations-SEZ-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "SEZ Act Overrides Procedural Lapses or Conditions in Tax Notifications under Finance Act: SEZ Units Eligible for Tax Exemptions for Authorized Operations within SEZ: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Delay in Filing Appeal by 23 Days as Director was Abroad: CESTAT directs Re-Adjudication to Decide on Condonation of Delay [Read Order]
The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) directed re-adjudication to decide in the matter of condonation of delay as there was delay in filing appeal by...
![Delay in Filing Appeal by 23 Days as Director was Abroad: CESTAT directs Re-Adjudication to Decide on Condonation of Delay [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Delay-in-Filing-Appeal-Delay-Appeal-Director-CESTAT-Directs-Re-Adjudication-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Delay in Filing Appeal by 23 Days as Director was Abroad: CESTAT directs Re-Adjudication to Decide on Condonation of Delay [Read Order]")
No Adjournment shall be Granted More than Three times to a Party during Hearing of An Excise Appeal u/s 35C of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that no adjournment shall be granted more than three times to a party during the hearing of an excise...
![No Adjournment shall be Granted More than Three times to a Party during Hearing of An Excise Appeal u/s 35C of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Adjournment-Granted-Three-Party-Hearing-Excise-Appeal-Central-Excise-Act-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Adjournment shall be Granted More than Three times to a Party during Hearing of An Excise Appeal u/s 35C of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Value of Corrugated Boxes Cleared to Merchant Exporter can be Includable for Computing Threshold under SSI Exemption Notification: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the value of corrugated boxes cleared to merchant exporters can be includable for computing...
![Value of Corrugated Boxes Cleared to Merchant Exporter can be Includable for Computing Threshold under SSI Exemption Notification: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Cleared-to-Merchant-ExporterComputing-Threshold-SSI-Exemption-Notification-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Value of Corrugated Boxes Cleared to Merchant Exporter can be Includable for Computing Threshold under SSI Exemption Notification: CESTAT [Read Order]")