![GST Registered Person must Respond to SCN Despite dropped Scrutiny Proceedings: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/gst-gst-news-goods-and-services-tax-scn-scn-news-show-cause-notice-madras-hc-madras-high-court-madras-hc-news-madras-highcourt-news-taxscan.jpg "GST Registered Person must Respond to SCN Despite dropped Scrutiny Proceedings: Madras HC [Read Order]")
GST Registered Person must Respond to SCN Despite dropped Scrutiny Proceedings: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court, in its recent ruling observed that the GST registered person must respond to show cause notice despite the scrutiny...
![SCN Provided only One Day Time for Reply: Madras HC sets aside Income Tax Assessment Order for Breach of Natural Justice [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/SCN-Madras-HC-Income-Tax-Assessment-Order-Natural-Justice-taxscan.jpg "SCN Provided only One Day Time for Reply: Madras HC sets aside Income Tax Assessment Order for Breach of Natural Justice [Read Order]")
![Mismatch between ITC in GSTR-3B and Auto-Populated GSTR-2A: Madras HC remands Matter for Reconsideration [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/ITC-Input-Tax-Credit-GSTR-3B-and-GSTR-2A-mismatch-Madras-High-Court-GSTR-3B-GSTR-2A-taxscan.jpeg "Mismatch between ITC in GSTR-3B and Auto-Populated GSTR-2A: Madras HC remands Matter for Reconsideration [Read Order]")
![GST Demand based on Mismatch in GSTR 3B return and auto-populated GSTR 2A:Â Madras HC directs Re-Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/GST-Mismatch-in-GSTR-3B-return-and-GSTR-2A-Madras-High-Court-GSTR-3B-return-GSTR-2A-taxscan.jpeg "GST Demand based on Mismatch in GSTR 3B return and auto-populated GSTR 2A:Â Madras HC directs Re-Adjudication [Read Order]")
![GSTR 3B and GSTR 2A Mismatch: Madras HC sets aside GST Demand Order on 10% Pre-Deposit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/madras-high-court-GST-GST-Demand-Order-GSTR-3B-and-GSTR-2A-GSTR-3B-and-GSTR-2A-Mismatch-taxscan.jpg "GSTR 3B and GSTR 2A Mismatch: Madras HC sets aside GST Demand Order on 10% Pre-Deposit [Read Order]")
GST liability confirmed on Purchase and Sales Turnover Mismatch: Madras HC allows Hearing Opportunity on 10% Pre-Deposit [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has granted a hearing opportunity for cases where GST liability was confirmed due to mismatches in purchase and sales turnover, with a requirement of a 10% pre-deposit. An...
![GST liability confirmed on Purchase and Sales Turnover Mismatch: Madras HC allows Hearing Opportunity on 10% Pre-Deposit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/GST-GST-liability-Madras-HC-Madras-HC-Hearing-Sales-Turnover-Mismatch-GST-updates-GST-news-taxscan.jpg "GST liability confirmed on Purchase and Sales Turnover Mismatch: Madras HC allows Hearing Opportunity on 10% Pre-Deposit [Read Order]")
KVAT turnover Methodology cannot be Followed without Documents Showing Actual Land Value: Kerala HC [Read Order]
The Kerala High Court has held that the methodology in determining total turnover prescribed under Kerala Value Added Tax ( KVAT )Rules cannot be followed in absence of documents showing actual land...
![KVAT turnover Methodology cannot be Followed without Documents Showing Actual Land Value: Kerala HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/KVAT-KVAT-Turnover-Methodology-Kerala-High-court-Kerala-Value-Added-Tax-Rules-Land-Value-Tax-taxscan.jpg "KVAT turnover Methodology cannot be Followed without Documents Showing Actual Land Value: Kerala HC [Read Order]")
Unaware of GST Proceedings in GSTR 3B and GSTR 2A Mismatch: Madras HC sets aside Order, remands for Reconsideration [Read Order]
The Madras High Court set aside an order concerning a GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) dispute due to a mismatch between GSTR 3B returns and the auto-populated GSTR 2A. The court emphasised the breach...
![Unaware of GST Proceedings in GSTR 3B and GSTR 2A Mismatch: Madras HC sets aside Order, remands for Reconsideration [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/GST-GST-Proceedings-GSTR-3B-GSTR-2A-GSTR-3B-and-GSTR-2A-Mismatch-Madras-high-court-taxscan.jpg "Unaware of GST Proceedings in GSTR 3B and GSTR 2A Mismatch: Madras HC sets aside Order, remands for Reconsideration [Read Order]")
No Undue Delay in Submitting Reply to SCN: Himachal Pradesh HC sets aside u/s 143 (3) of Income Tax Act and remits matter back to PCIT [Read Order]
The Himachal Pradesh High Court has set aside the order under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, citing no undue delay in submitting the reply to the Show Cause Notice, and has remitted the...
![No Undue Delay in Submitting Reply to SCN: Himachal Pradesh HC sets aside u/s 143 (3) of Income Tax Act and remits matter back to PCIT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court-Principal-Commissioner-of-Income-Tax-SCN-Delay-in-Reply-to-SCN-taxscan-2.jpg "No Undue Delay in Submitting Reply to SCN: Himachal Pradesh HC sets aside u/s 143 (3) of Income Tax Act and remits matter back to PCIT [Read Order]")
Hearing Opportunity is Mandatory u/s 75(4) of GST Act for determination of Tax Liability by Revenue Authorities: Allahabad HC [Read Order]
In a significant ruling, the Allahabad High Court held that an opportunity for hearing is mandatory under Section 75(4) of the Goods and Services Tax ( GST) Act. The assessee, Eveready Industries...
![Hearing Opportunity is Mandatory u/s 75(4) of GST Act for determination of Tax Liability by Revenue Authorities: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/GST-GST-act-Allahabad-High-Court-Tax-Liability-hearing-on-tax-liaility-Revenue-Authorities-taxscan.jpg "Hearing Opportunity is Mandatory u/s 75(4) of GST Act for determination of Tax Liability by Revenue Authorities: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
Failure to pay Service Tax under “Manpower Recruitment of Supply Agency Services" due to Bonafide Employer-Employee Relationship Belief: CESTAT sets aside Demand [Read Order]
The New Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) set aside the demand for service tax as it was found that failure to pay Service Tax under “manpower...
![Failure to pay Service Tax under “Manpower Recruitment of Supply Agency Services due to Bonafide Employer-Employee Relationship Belief: CESTAT sets aside Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/CESTAT-delhi-Service-Tax-manpower-recruitment-Bonafide-Employer-Employee-Relationship-taxscan.jpg "Failure to pay Service Tax under “Manpower Recruitment of Supply Agency Services due to Bonafide Employer-Employee Relationship Belief: CESTAT sets aside Demand [Read Order]")
Process of Cutting Jumbo and Slitting does not fall under Definition of Manufacturing as per Section 2 (f) of Central Excise Tariff Act: CESTAT
The Hyderabad bench of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) ruled that the process of cutting jumbo rolls and slitting does not fall under the definition of manufacturing...
