![No Service Tax on Travel Expenses incurred by Employees as Services are never received in India: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/service-tax-on-travel-expenses-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "No Service Tax on Travel Expenses incurred by Employees as Services are never received in India: CESTAT [Read Order]")
No Service Tax on Travel Expenses incurred by Employees as Services are never received in India: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs, Excises, and Service Taxes Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bangalore Bench held that no service tax on travel expenses incurred by the...
![Madras High Court quashes levy of Penalty under Section 112(a) or 114AA of the Customs Act as SCN not issued by Proper Officer [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Madras-High-Court-levy-of-penalty-Customs-Act-1962-SCN-proper-officer-Taxscan.jpg "Madras High Court quashes levy of Penalty under Section 112(a) or 114AA of the Customs Act as SCN not issued by Proper Officer [Read Order]")
![Kerala GST Dept. issues Guidelines for Determination of Tax Liability and Adjudication case in respect of normal and fraud/ suppression case [Read Circular]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Kerala-GST-Dept-Determination-of-Tax-Liability-Adjudication-case-suppression-case-Taxscan.jpg "Kerala GST Dept. issues Guidelines for Determination of Tax Liability and Adjudication case in respect of normal and fraud/ suppression case [Read Circular]")
![Fairness should be applied while Interpreting Provisions of Dispute Resolution Scheme as Its Object is to reduce Legacy Tax Disputes: Madras HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/SVLDRS-respondent-authority-Taxscan.jpeg "Fairness should be applied while Interpreting Provisions of Dispute Resolution Scheme as Its Object is to reduce Legacy Tax Disputes: Madras HC [Read Judgment]")
‘Casino Vessels’ classifiable as ‘Passenger Ship’ under heading 8901 9000 and not ‘Pleasure Boats’: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise v Vijai Marine Services held that ‘casino vessels’ could not be...
![‘Casino Vessels’ classifiable as ‘Passenger Ship’ under heading 8901 9000 and not ‘Pleasure Boats’: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Casino-Vessels-Floating-Ships-Mumbai-Bench-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "‘Casino Vessels’ classifiable as ‘Passenger Ship’ under heading 8901 9000 and not ‘Pleasure Boats’: CESTAT [Read Order]")
SCN quashed where it was possible for authority to adjudicate within period of limitation: Delhi HC [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court in the case of Sunder System Pvt Ltd v Union of India held that the SCN to be quashed where it was possible on behalf of the adjudicating authority to adjudicate within the period...
![SCN quashed where it was possible for authority to adjudicate within period of limitation: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Delhi-High-Court-1-Tax-Scan.jpg "SCN quashed where it was possible for authority to adjudicate within period of limitation: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
SCN issued in a Template-Like Manner can’t be challenged through Writ Petition: Madras HC [Read Judgment]
The Madras High Court has held that a show-cause notice which is issued in a template-like manner cannot be challenged before the Court through a writ petition. The assessee-company exports software...
![SCN issued in a Template-Like Manner can’t be challenged through Writ Petition: Madras HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/SCN-Madras-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "SCN issued in a Template-Like Manner can’t be challenged through Writ Petition: Madras HC [Read Judgment]")
