![Larger Period of Limitation u/s 11A(1) of Central Excise Act Could Not be Proceed Unless Holder for valuable consideration Shown to be Party to Fraud: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Larger-Period-of-Limitation-Central-Excise-Act-Holder-for-valuable-consideration-excise-customs-service-tax-taxscan.jpg "Larger Period of Limitation u/s 11A(1) of Central Excise Act Could Not be Proceed Unless Holder for valuable consideration Shown to be Party to Fraud: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Larger Period of Limitation u/s 11A(1) of Central Excise Act Could Not be Proceed Unless Holder for valuable consideration Shown to be Party to Fraud: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Kolkata bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that a larger period of limitation under section...
![CESTAT quashes Excise Duty Demand on Utilizing Cenvated Inputs in Processing on Job Work Undertaken [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/CESTAT-quashes-Excise-Duty-Demand-Excise-Duty-Demand-Cenvated-Inputs-in-Processing-on-Job-Work-Undertaken-Job-Work-Undertaken-Cenvated-Inputs-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT quashes Excise Duty Demand on Utilizing Cenvated Inputs in Processing on Job Work Undertaken [Read Order]")
![Difference in Books of Account Reconciled with Corroborative Evidence: CESTAT sets aside Penalty under Excise Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Penalty-under-Excise-Act-CESTAT-sets-TAXSCAN.jpg "Difference in Books of Account Reconciled with Corroborative Evidence: CESTAT sets aside Penalty under Excise Act [Read Order]")
![Relief to Steel Authority of India: CESTAT quashes Excise Duty Demand on Differential Value of Stock of Finished or Semi-Finished Goods [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Relief-to-Steel-Authority-of-India-CESTAT-quashes-Excise-Duty-Demand-Differential-Value-of-Stock-Finished-or-Semi-Finished-Goods-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Relief to Steel Authority of India: CESTAT quashes Excise Duty Demand on Differential Value of Stock of Finished or Semi-Finished Goods [Read Order]")
Demand of Extended Period is not Sustainable on no Proof of Suppression of fact: CESTAT quashes Penalty u/s 11AC of CETA [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), quashed the penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (CETA) and observed that the demand of...
![Demand of Extended Period is not Sustainable on no Proof of Suppression of fact: CESTAT quashes Penalty u/s 11AC of CETA [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Demand-of-Extended-Period-Demand-Extended-Period-Sustainable-Proof-of-Suppression-of-fact-CESTAT-CESTAT-quashes-Penalty-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "Demand of Extended Period is not Sustainable on no Proof of Suppression of fact: CESTAT quashes Penalty u/s 11AC of CETA [Read Order]")
Commencement or discontinuation of Retail Sale Price made only once in a Particular Month: CESTAT quashes Central Excise Duty on Pan Masala
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), quashed the central excise duty on pan masala as the commencement or discontinuation of retail sale price made...
Amount Charged as Freight & Handling Charges Being Separately Shown in Invoices, not Assessable u/s 4 of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench, has recently, in an appeal filed before it, held that the amount charged as freight & handling charges, being separately...
![Amount Charged as Freight & Handling Charges Being Separately Shown in Invoices, not Assessable u/s 4 of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Amount-Charged-Freight-and-Handling-Charges-Invoices-Central-Excise-Act-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Amount Charged as Freight & Handling Charges Being Separately Shown in Invoices, not Assessable u/s 4 of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Mere Omission to inform Excise Dept about Registration of Product under Insecticide Act cannot be a Wilful Misstatement of Fact, No Penalty u/s 11AC: CESTAT
In a recent judgement, the Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that mere omission to inform the Excise department about the registration of a...
![Relief to Birla Corporation: CESTAT quashes Excise Duty Demand holding Time Barred [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Birla-Corporation-Relief-to-Birla-Corporation-CESTAT-Excise-Duty-Demand-Excise-Duty-Time-Barred-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Relief to Birla Corporation: CESTAT quashes Excise Duty Demand holding Time Barred [Read Order]")
Violation of Section 11AC of CEA: CESTAT Orders to Pay 25% of Penalty within 30 days from date of Communication of Order [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), ordered to pay 25% of penalty within 30 days from date of communication of order for violation of Section 11AC of...
![Violation of Section 11AC of CEA: CESTAT Orders to Pay 25% of Penalty within 30 days from date of Communication of Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Violation-Section-11AC-of-CEA-CESTAT-penalty-communication-of-order-TAXSCAN.jpg "Violation of Section 11AC of CEA: CESTAT Orders to Pay 25% of Penalty within 30 days from date of Communication of Order [Read Order]")