![ITAT confirms Penalty for Deliberate Concealment of Income u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/ITAT-confirms-Penalty-for-Deliberate-Concealment-of-Income-ITAT-Penalty-Income-Concealment-of-Income-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT confirms Penalty for Deliberate Concealment of Income u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]")
ITAT confirms Penalty for Deliberate Concealment of Income u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) recently confirmed the penalty for deliberate income concealment under Section...
![Change of opinion & Change in Method of Accounting by assessee not Deemed Concealment of income: ITAT upholds Deletion of Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Change-in-Method-of-Accounting-by-assessee-Deemed-Concealment-of-income-Concealment-of-income-ITAT-upholds-Deletion-of-Penalty-Deletion-of-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "Change of opinion & Change in Method of Accounting by assessee not Deemed Concealment of income: ITAT upholds Deletion of Penalty [Read Order]")
![Addition made by AO u/s 68 of IT Act could not made in Absence of any Incriminating Material: ITAT quashes Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/IT-Act-could-not-made-Absence-of-any-Incriminating-Material-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Addition made by AO u/s 68 of IT Act could not made in Absence of any Incriminating Material: ITAT quashes Order [Read Order]")
![No Penalty can be Imposed u/s 271(1) when Income Surrendered by Assessee During Survey is Shown in Regular Income-Tax Return Filed within Prescribed Time: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/when-Income-Surrendered-Assessee-During-Survey-in-Regular-Income-Tax-Return-Filed-within-Prescribed-Time-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Penalty can be Imposed u/s 271(1) when Income Surrendered by Assessee During Survey is Shown in Regular Income-Tax Return Filed within Prescribed Time: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Re-Assessment Order Passed Completely Inconsistent With Previous Assessment without a valid reason is invalid: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Re-Assessment-Order-Passed-Completely-Inconsistent-With-Previous-Assessment-Delhi-HC-TAXSCAN.jpg "Re-Assessment Order Passed Completely Inconsistent With Previous Assessment without a valid reason is invalid: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
Incriminating Statements by Third Parties Cannot Be Used for Addition in Income Tax Assessment: ITAT [Read Order]
The Hyderabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) recently ruled that the incriminating statements by third parties cannot be used for addition in Income Tax assessment. The ...
![Incriminating Statements by Third Parties Cannot Be Used for Addition in Income Tax Assessment: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Incriminating-Statements-by-Third-Parties-Incriminating-Statements-Income-Tax-Assessment-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Incriminating Statements by Third Parties Cannot Be Used for Addition in Income Tax Assessment: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Assessment Order Framed against Non-Existing Company Illegal and Void Ab Initio: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Assessment-Order-Framed-against-Non-Existing-Company-Assessment-Order-Non-Existing-Company-ITAT-Void-Ab-Initio-Taxscan.jpg "Assessment Order Framed against Non-Existing Company Illegal and Void Ab Initio: ITAT [Read Order]")
![No Income Tax Addition can be made in respect of Addition under the Black Money Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Income-Tax-Addition-Income-Tax-Addition-Black-Money-Act-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "No Income Tax Addition can be made in respect of Addition under the Black Money Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
Assesse cannot Claim Cost of Improvement and Indexation Cost unless provides Evidence to Prove Construction: ITAT [Read Order]
The Hyderabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has recently held that assessees could not claim cost of improvement and indexation cost unless they provide evidence to prove...
![Assesse cannot Claim Cost of Improvement and Indexation Cost unless provides Evidence to Prove Construction: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Assesse-Improvement-Indexation-Cost-Evidence-Prove-Construction-Construction-ITAT-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Assesse cannot Claim Cost of Improvement and Indexation Cost unless provides Evidence to Prove Construction: ITAT [Read Order]")
Non-Compliance due to Bonafide Reason: ITAT Quashes Penalty Order u/s 271(1)(b) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]
The Surat Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), comprising Pawan Singh, Judicial Member quashed the Penalty Order under Section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the ground of...
![Non-Compliance due to Bonafide Reason: ITAT Quashes Penalty Order u/s 271(1)(b) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/ITAT-Penalty-Order-Income-Tax-Act-income-tax-taxscan.jpg "Non-Compliance due to Bonafide Reason: ITAT Quashes Penalty Order u/s 271(1)(b) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
Gujarat HC quashes prosecution under Income tax Act on Undisclosed Income in absence of a willful attempt to Evade Tax, Penalty or Interest [Read Order]
The High Court (HC) of Gujarat quashed prosecution under the Income Tax Act, 1961 on undisclosed income in absence of a willful attempt to evade tax, penalty, or interest. Suman Paper &Boards...
![Gujarat HC quashes prosecution under Income tax Act on Undisclosed Income in absence of a willful attempt to Evade Tax, Penalty or Interest [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Gujarat-HC-Income-tax-Act-Income-evade-tax-Penalty-Interest-TAXSCAN.jpg "Gujarat HC quashes prosecution under Income tax Act on Undisclosed Income in absence of a willful attempt to Evade Tax, Penalty or Interest [Read Order]")
Imposition of Income Tax Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) instead of 271AAB: Jharkhand HC upholds ITAT Order Deleting Penalty [Read Order]
The Jharkhand High Court has recently upheld the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) against the revenue, nodding to the deletion of penalty imposed on the assessee under Section...
![Imposition of Income Tax Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) instead of 271AAB: Jharkhand HC upholds ITAT Order Deleting Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Imposition-of-Income-Tax-Penalty-Income-Tax-Penalty-Jharkhand-High-Court-ITAT-Penalty-ITAT-Order-Taxscan.jpg "Imposition of Income Tax Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) instead of 271AAB: Jharkhand HC upholds ITAT Order Deleting Penalty [Read Order]")