![Section 56 (2)(vii) not Applicable to Non-Resident: ITAT deletes Income Tax Addition of Rs. 9.31 Cr [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Income-Tax-ITAT-ITAT-delhi-Section-56-2vii-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-non-applicability-Income-Tax-Addition-taxscan.jpg "Section 56 (2)(vii) not Applicable to Non-Resident: ITAT deletes Income Tax Addition of Rs. 9.31 Cr [Read Order]")
Section 56 (2)(vii) not Applicable to Non-Resident: ITAT deletes Income Tax Addition of Rs. 9.31 Cr [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted the addition of Rs. 9.31 crore citing the non-applicability of Section 56(2)(vii)...
![Non-Deduction of TDS u/s 40(a)(ia) of Income Tax Act: ITAT confirms Addition of Rs 10.8 Lakhs [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/ITAT-TDS-Non-Deduction-of-TDS-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Tax-Deducted-at-Source-TDS-Non-Deduction-taxscan.png "Non-Deduction of TDS u/s 40(a)(ia) of Income Tax Act: ITAT confirms Addition of Rs 10.8 Lakhs [Read Order]")
![Filing Audit Report in Form 10CCB before filing ITR is only directory Not Mandatory: ITAT allows S.80IA Deduction [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Filing-Audit-Report-Form-10CCB-ITR-ITAT-S.80IA-Deduction-taxscan.jpg "Filing Audit Report in Form 10CCB before filing ITR is only directory Not Mandatory: ITAT allows S.80IA Deduction [Read Order]")
Determination of Income in Assessment Order cannot be basis for Filing of ITR u/s 139 (1): ITAT Quashes Penalty u/s 271 F of Income Tax Act [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) quashes penalty under Section 271F of the Income Tax Act, stating that determination of income in the assessment order cannot serve as the basis for filing...
![Determination of Income in Assessment Order cannot be basis for Filing of ITR u/s 139 (1): ITAT Quashes Penalty u/s 271 F of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Labor-Expenses-Capitalised-Land-value-No-Deduction-claimed-P-L-Account-ITAT-deletes-taxscan.jpg "Determination of Income in Assessment Order cannot be basis for Filing of ITR u/s 139 (1): ITAT Quashes Penalty u/s 271 F of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
No Disallowance on payments towards PF and ESI made before due date of filing Income Tax Return u/s 139(1) of Act: ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that there was no disallowance on  payment towards the Provident Fund and Employee State Insurance (ESI) made before the due date of filing...
![No Disallowance on payments towards PF and ESI made before due date of filing Income Tax Return u/s 139(1) of Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/disallowance-payments-PF-and-ESI-Income-Tax-Return-us-1391-of-Act-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Disallowance on payments towards PF and ESI made before due date of filing Income Tax Return u/s 139(1) of Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
Penalty u/s 271(1) shall be Calculated Based on Additions Made to Income Disclosed in ITR u/s 139(1) of Income Tax Act : ITAT [Read Order]
The Kolkata bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has deleted the penalty under Section 271(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, stating that penalties shall be calculated based on additions...
![Penalty u/s 271(1) shall be Calculated Based on Additions Made to Income Disclosed in ITR u/s 139(1) of Income Tax Act : ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/ITAT-ITAT-Kolkata-Income-Tax-ITR-Income-Tax-Return-TAXSCAN.jpg "Penalty u/s 271(1) shall be Calculated Based on Additions Made to Income Disclosed in ITR u/s 139(1) of Income Tax Act : ITAT [Read Order]")
Carry Forward of Losses of Vodafone Idea: Supreme Court issues Notice in Income Tax Dept’s SLP on Delay Condonation [Read Order]
The Supreme Court directed to issue notice in Income Tax Department’s special leave petition (SLP) on Delay Condonation in the matter regarding Carry Forward of losses of Vodafone Idea Before the...
![Carry Forward of Losses of Vodafone Idea: Supreme Court issues Notice in Income Tax Dept’s SLP on Delay Condonation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Losses-Vodafone-Idea-Supreme-Court-Income-Tax-Dept-SLP-Delay-Condonation-taxscan.jpg "Carry Forward of Losses of Vodafone Idea: Supreme Court issues Notice in Income Tax Dept’s SLP on Delay Condonation [Read Order]")
Prosecution not sustainable when Tax payable after Credit of prepaid Taxes less than Rs 3000: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court recently observed that the prosecution is not sustainable when tax payable after credit of prepaid taxes is less than Rs 3000. The respondent, the Deputy Commissioner of...
![Prosecution not sustainable when Tax payable after Credit of prepaid Taxes less than Rs 3000: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Tax-payable-Prosecution-Sustainable-Prosecution-not-Sustainable-Credit-of-Prepaid-Taxes-Prepaid-Taxes-taxscan.jpg "Prosecution not sustainable when Tax payable after Credit of prepaid Taxes less than Rs 3000: Madras HC [Read Order]")
Failure to prove Statement and Certificate filed along with Form No.67Â u /r 128(8)(ii) IT Rules for claiming FTC in which Income received from Kazakhstan Employer: ITAT directs Re-Adjudication
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Pune bench, while directing readjudication in respect of Foreign Tax Credit (FTC), observed that the assessee had failed to prove the statement and...
Commissioner of Income Tax empowered to condone delay for Filing Return u/s 119 (2)(b) of Income Tax Act: Kerala HC directs to CIT to Condone Delay [Read Order]
A Single Bench of Kerala High Court directed the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeal (CIT(A)) to condone delay as the Commissioner of Income Tax is empowered to condone delay for filing return under...
![Commissioner of Income Tax empowered to condone delay for Filing Return u/s 119 (2)(b) of Income Tax Act: Kerala HC directs to CIT to Condone Delay [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Commissioner-of-Income-Tax-Income-Tax-condone-delay-Kerala-HC-kerala-high-court-high-court-taxscan.jpg "Commissioner of Income Tax empowered to condone delay for Filing Return u/s 119 (2)(b) of Income Tax Act: Kerala HC directs to CIT to Condone Delay [Read Order]")