Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Clandestine Removal Proven Through Private Diary & S.14 Admissions: CESTAT Upholds Excise Duty and Penalty on Tobacco Manufacturer [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/31/500x300_2122785-clandestine-removal-proven-through-private-diary-s14-admissions-taxscan.webp "Clandestine Removal Proven Through Private Diary & S.14 Admissions: CESTAT Upholds Excise Duty and Penalty on Tobacco Manufacturer [Read Order]")
Clandestine Removal Proven Through Private Diary & S.14 Admissions: CESTAT Upholds Excise Duty and Penalty on Tobacco Manufacturer [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad (CESTAT) held that clandestine manufacture and removal of excisable goods stands...
![CESTAT Remands Service Tax Dispute on Construction Services for Fresh Computation of Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/29/250x150_2092321-construction-services-taxscan.webp "CESTAT Remands Service Tax Dispute on Construction Services for Fresh Computation of Demand [Read Order]")
![Customs Officers Cannot Alter FOB Value as It Reflects Buyer-Seller Agreement: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/fob.jpg "Customs Officers Cannot Alter FOB Value as It Reflects Buyer-Seller Agreement: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Statements Recorded during Investigation must Comply with S. 9D of Central Excise Act before Reliance: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/CESTAT-CESTAT-New-Delhi-Section-9D-of-Central-Excise-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Statements Recorded during Investigation must Comply with S. 9D of Central Excise Act before Reliance: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Non-Compliance with Section 9D, Statements Without Cross-Examination Unsustainable for Demand: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-Kolkata-CESTAT-News-Non-Compliance-Taxscan.jpg "Non-Compliance with Section 9D, Statements Without Cross-Examination Unsustainable for Demand: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Clandestine Removal and Under-Valuation Charges not sustainable on ground of Assumptions and Presumptions: Delhi HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling the Delhi High Court observed that clandestine removal and under-valuation charges is not sustainable on ground of assumptions and presumptions. The Commissioner of Central...
Sufficient Evidences adduced to allege Clandestine Removal: CESTAT upholds Penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules [Read Order]
The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), upheld the penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 on the proof that sufficient evidences...
![Sufficient Evidences adduced to allege Clandestine Removal: CESTAT upholds Penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/allege-Clandestine-Removal-CESTAT-upholds-Penalty-Central-Excise-Rules-Clandestine-Removal-upholds-Penalty-CESTAT-CESTAT-News-Excise-Customs-Service-Tax-Tax-News-TAXSCAN.jpg "Sufficient Evidences adduced to allege Clandestine Removal: CESTAT upholds Penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules [Read Order]")