![Taxpayer is an agriculturalist presents Evidence of Land ownership by wife and children: ITAT deletes addition of 4.76 lakhs [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Taxpayer-agriculturalist-Evidence-of-Land-ownership-wife-and-children-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Taxpayer is an agriculturalist presents Evidence of Land ownership by wife and children: ITAT deletes addition of 4.76 lakhs [Read Order]")
Taxpayer is an agriculturalist presents Evidence of Land ownership by wife and children: ITAT deletes addition of 4.76 lakhs [Read Order]
In a recent ruling the Hyderabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) deleted the addition of Rs. 4.76 lakhs after the taxpayer, an...
![Discrepancy in Form 26AS and Profit & Loss Account due to Service Tax Amount Declaration: ITAT upholds Deletion of Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Discrepancy-Form-26AS-Profit-Loss-Service-Tax-Amount-Declaration-ITAT-Deletion-Deletion-of-Addition-taxscan.jpg "Discrepancy in Form 26AS and Profit & Loss Account due to Service Tax Amount Declaration: ITAT upholds Deletion of Addition [Read Order]")
![Gujarat HC dismisses Writ Petition as on Failure to Prove no Satisfaction Note recorded by AO prior to Issuance of Notice u/s 153C of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Gujarat-High-Court-Writ-Petition-Income-Tax-Satisfaction-Note-Failure-to-Prove-taxscan.jpg "Gujarat HC dismisses Writ Petition as on Failure to Prove no Satisfaction Note recorded by AO prior to Issuance of Notice u/s 153C of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
![Income earned from carrying out educational activity is eligible for exemption u/S 10 (23C)(vi) of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Educational-income-Income-Tax-ITAT-Kolkata-Tax-exemption-for-educational-income-taxscan.jpg "Income earned from carrying out educational activity is eligible for exemption u/S 10 (23C)(vi) of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Supreme court upholds ITAT’s power in having a final say on reopening of investigation proceedings against assessee [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Supreme-court-ITAT-Income-tax-appellate-tribunal-TAXSCAN-1.jpg "Supreme court upholds ITAT’s power in having a final say on reopening of investigation proceedings against assessee [Read Order]")
Deletion of Amount added u/s 68 of Income Tax Act in Consonance with NCLT order: Delhi HC sets aside Demand of Penalty [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court set aside the demand for a penalty as the deletion of the amount added u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in consonance with the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) order....
![Deletion of Amount added u/s 68 of Income Tax Act in Consonance with NCLT order: Delhi HC sets aside Demand of Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Income-Tax-Act-Consonance-NCLT-Delhi-HC-Demand-of-Penalty-TAXSCAN.jpg "Deletion of Amount added u/s 68 of Income Tax Act in Consonance with NCLT order: Delhi HC sets aside Demand of Penalty [Read Order]")
Failure by AO to Demonstrate Deficiency in Explanation: Delhi HC quashes Income Tax Notice [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court quashed income tax notice as there was failure on the part of the Assessing Officer (AO) to demonstrate deficiency in explanation. By the writ petition, challenge is laid to...
![Failure by AO to Demonstrate Deficiency in Explanation: Delhi HC quashes Income Tax Notice [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Failure-by-AO-Demonstrate-Deficiency-Delhi-High-Court-quashes-Income-Tax-Notice-Income-Tax-Notice-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-TAXSCAN.jpg "Failure by AO to Demonstrate Deficiency in Explanation: Delhi HC quashes Income Tax Notice [Read Order]")
Comparison with Fair Market value of Loan Interest not Made while Making Disallowance u/s 40A(2)(a): ITAT Deletes Disallowance [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted the disallowance holding that the comparison with fair market value of loan interest was not made while making disallowance under...
![Comparison with Fair Market value of Loan Interest not Made while Making Disallowance u/s 40A(2)(a): ITAT Deletes Disallowance [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Comparison-with-Fair-Market-value-of-Loan-Interest-Fair-Market-value-Loan-Interest-ITAT-Deletes-Disallowance-income-tax-act-income-tax-Disallowance-ITAT-Fair-Market-value-of-Loan-Interest.jpg "Comparison with Fair Market value of Loan Interest not Made while Making Disallowance u/s 40A(2)(a): ITAT Deletes Disallowance [Read Order]")
Amount declared as Advance in year under Consideration and offered to Tax in Subsequent year can't be again added to Income of Assessee: ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the amount declared as an advance in the year under consideration and offered to tax in the subsequent year cannot be again...
![Amount declared as Advance in year under Consideration and offered to Tax in Subsequent year cant be again added to Income of Assessee: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Amount-declared-Advance-in-year-Consideration-offered-Tax-in-Subsequent-Income-of-Assessee-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Amount declared as Advance in year under Consideration and offered to Tax in Subsequent year cant be again added to Income of Assessee: ITAT [Read Order]")
ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271B of Income Tax Act as Turnover was below 2 Crores as Prescribed u/s 44AD [Read Order]
The Jaipur Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted the penalty under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act 1961, as the turnover was below 2 crores as prescribed under Section 44AD of...
![ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271B of Income Tax Act as Turnover was below 2 Crores as Prescribed u/s 44AD [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/ITAT-deletes-Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-as-Turnover-was-below-2-Crores-as-Prescribed-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271B of Income Tax Act as Turnover was below 2 Crores as Prescribed u/s 44AD [Read Order]")
Payment made to Gateway providers are not Brokerage, TDS u/s 194H of Income Tax Act not Applicable: ITAT [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the payments made to gateway providers are not brokerage and TDS under Section 194H of the Income Tax Act,1961 is not liable to...
![Payment made to Gateway providers are not Brokerage, TDS u/s 194H of Income Tax Act not Applicable: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Payment-made-to-Gateway-providers-Brokerage-TDS-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-Payment-taxscan.jpg "Payment made to Gateway providers are not Brokerage, TDS u/s 194H of Income Tax Act not Applicable: ITAT [Read Order]")
RPM is the most Appropriate Method in International Transactions of Celio Future Fashion pertaining to Import of Men’s Wear for Resale: ITAT directs De novo Benchmarking [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has directed denovo benchmarking holding that the Resale Price Method (RPM) is the most appropriate method in international transactions of...
![RPM is the most Appropriate Method in International Transactions of Celio Future Fashion pertaining to Import of Men’s Wear for Resale: ITAT directs De novo Benchmarking [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/RPM-most-Appropriate-Method-International-Transactions-Celio-Future-Fashion-pertaining-Import-of-Mens-Wear-Resale-ITAT-Directs-De-novo-Benchmarking-taxscan.jpg "RPM is the most Appropriate Method in International Transactions of Celio Future Fashion pertaining to Import of Men’s Wear for Resale: ITAT directs De novo Benchmarking [Read Order]")