![Procedure u/s 50C must follow while Sale consideration differs from Stamp Value: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-ITAT-Bangalore-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Income-tax-Section-50C-of-Income-Tax-Act-Taxscan.jpg "Procedure u/s 50C must follow while Sale consideration differs from Stamp Value: ITAT [Read Order]")
Procedure u/s 50C must follow while Sale consideration differs from Stamp Value: ITAT [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) ruled that when the sale consideration in the sale deed differs from the stamp duty...
![ITAT Remands Case for Reassessment of Rs. 9.74 Lakh Unexplained Cash Deposits, allows Assessee to Submit Evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/ITAT-ITAT-Kolkata-Unexplained-Cash-Deposit-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-ITAT-Case-for-Reassessment-of-Cash-Deposit-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT Remands Case for Reassessment of Rs. 9.74 Lakh Unexplained Cash Deposits, allows Assessee to Submit Evidence [Read Order]")
![Rule 12E of Income Tax Rules does not confine CBDT’s powers to only authorize NFAC Officers for purposes u/s 142(1): Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Delhi-High-Court-Rule-12E-of-Income-Tax-Rules-Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Rule-CBDT-NFAC-Taxscan.jpg "Rule 12E of Income Tax Rules does not confine CBDT’s powers to only authorize NFAC Officers for purposes u/s 142(1): Delhi HC [Read Order]")
![Partnership Firm Converted into LLP: ITAT quashes Revision Proceedings Due to Non-Existence of Entity [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-ITAT-Surat-Revision-Proceedings-Partnership-Firm-Income-Tax-Section-263-of-Income-Tax-Act-Partnership-firm-converted-into-LLP-TAXSCAN.jpg "Partnership Firm Converted into LLP: ITAT quashes Revision Proceedings Due to Non-Existence of Entity [Read Order]")
![AO Fails assuming 8% of Unsecured Loans from Non-Members as Net Profit: ITAT deletes addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-AO-Net-Profit-Unsecured-Loans-Taxscan.jpg "AO Fails assuming 8% of Unsecured Loans from Non-Members as Net Profit: ITAT deletes addition [Read Order]")
ITAT directs AO to delete addition as lower authorities fail to rebut assessee's explanation on Term Deposit Maturity and Redemption [Read Order]
The two member bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) in Delhi has directed the Assessing Officer to remove the addition, as the lower authorities failed to counter the assessee's...
![ITAT directs AO to delete addition as lower authorities fail to rebut assessees explanation on Term Deposit Maturity and Redemption [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-ITAT-Delhi-Income-Tax-Deposit-Maturity-Redemption-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-bank-statements-taxscan.jpg "ITAT directs AO to delete addition as lower authorities fail to rebut assessees explanation on Term Deposit Maturity and Redemption [Read Order]")
Proper Adjudication and Verification Needed for Addition of Unexplained Cash Credit u/s 68 of Income Tax Act:ITAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer (AO) for proper verification and adjudication under Section 68 of Income Tax Act, 1961 after...
![Proper Adjudication and Verification Needed for Addition of Unexplained Cash Credit u/s 68 of Income Tax Act:ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-Adjudication-Verification-Cash-Credit-Unexplained-Cash-Credit-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Proper Adjudication and Verification Needed for Addition of Unexplained Cash Credit u/s 68 of Income Tax Act:ITAT [Read Order]")
ITAT directs AO to deletes addition of 3.92 Lakhs if Market Value difference is within 10% Tolerance limit [Read Order]
In the case of Tarun Mohan Jani vs ACIT, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellant, granting him relief from an addition of ₹3, 92,000 made under Section 56(2)...
![ITAT directs AO to deletes addition of 3.92 Lakhs if Market Value difference is within 10% Tolerance limit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ITAT-Income-Tax-ITAT-Mumbai-Stamp-duty-valuation-Stamp-duty-warehouse-stamp-duty-taxscan.jpg "ITAT directs AO to deletes addition of 3.92 Lakhs if Market Value difference is within 10% Tolerance limit [Read Order]")
![ITAT Remands Case to CIT(A) Due to Incorrect Filing Date of Income Tax Return [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Return-ITAT-Income-Tax-Commissioner-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT Remands Case to CIT(A) Due to Incorrect Filing Date of Income Tax Return [Read Order]")
CIT(A) Fails to Verify Correct Date of Filing Income Tax Return: ITAT Restores Case to CIT(A) [Read Order]
A two-member bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Cuttack has restored a case to the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals (CIT (A)) after finding that the CIT (A) failed to verify the...
![CIT(A) Fails to Verify Correct Date of Filing Income Tax Return: ITAT Restores Case to CIT(A) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ITAT-CITA-Income-Tax-Return-Income-Tax-CITA-Fails-Commissioner-of-Income-Tax-Appeals-Taxscan.jpg "CIT(A) Fails to Verify Correct Date of Filing Income Tax Return: ITAT Restores Case to CIT(A) [Read Order]")
Faceless Personal Hearing u/s 144B(6)(8) should be Granted Mandatorily if Requested: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has ruled that a faceless hearing under Section 144B(6)(8) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, must be granted if requested. This court set aside the assessment order that had...
![Faceless Personal Hearing u/s 144B(6)(8) should be Granted Mandatorily if Requested: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Madras-High-Court-Section-144B68-of-the-Income-Tax-Act-Faceless-Hearing-taxscan.jpeg "Faceless Personal Hearing u/s 144B(6)(8) should be Granted Mandatorily if Requested: Madras HC [Read Order]")