![AO Failed to Record Reason for Escape of Income due to Non-disclosure of Materials Facts by Assessee u/s 147 of Income Tax Act: ITAT Quashes Re-Assessment [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/AO-Income-AO-Failed-to-Record-Reason-for-Escape-of-Income-Non-disclosure-of-Materials-Facts-by-Assessee-taxscan.jpg "AO Failed to Record Reason for Escape of Income due to Non-disclosure of Materials Facts by Assessee u/s 147 of Income Tax Act: ITAT Quashes Re-Assessment [Read Order]")
AO Failed to Record Reason for Escape of Income due to Non-disclosure of Materials Facts by Assessee u/s 147 of Income Tax Act: ITAT Quashes Re-Assessment [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the Assessing Officer failed to record reason for occurance of escape of income...
![Partnership Firm not entitled to Tax Deduction on LTCG u/s 48(i) of Income Tax Act for Mortgaging Property as Collateral Security: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Partnership-Firm-not-entitled-to-Tax-Deduction-on-LTCG-Income-Tax-Act-Tax-Deduction-on-LTCG-Mortgaging-Property-Collateral-Security-ITAT-Tax-Deduction-Partnership-Firm-taxscan.jpg "Partnership Firm not entitled to Tax Deduction on LTCG u/s 48(i) of Income Tax Act for Mortgaging Property as Collateral Security: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Mere Mistake in Form 35 does not result in Deficient Appeal: ITAT grants another Opportunity to rectify Mistake [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Mere-Mistake-Appeal-Mere-Mistake-in-Form-35-does-not-result-in-Deficient-Appeal-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Mere Mistake in Form 35 does not result in Deficient Appeal: ITAT grants another Opportunity to rectify Mistake [Read Order]")
![No scope for Reassessment on issue which is Subject Matter of Appeal before Appellate Authority: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Reassessment-Subject-Matter-of-Appeal-Appeal-Appellate-Authority-ITAT-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "No scope for Reassessment on issue which is Subject Matter of Appeal before Appellate Authority: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Calcutta HC Dismisses Writ Petition as no Objection filed before AO against Assessment Order u/s 147 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Calcutta-HC-Writ-Petition-Objection-filed-AO-Assessment-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpeg "Calcutta HC Dismisses Writ Petition as no Objection filed before AO against Assessment Order u/s 147 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
Writ Jurisdiction cannot be Invoked when Order u/s 148A(d) Income Tax Act Culminated into Final Assessment Order: Calcutta HC [Read Order]
In a major decision a Single Judge Bench of the Calcutta High Court observed that the writ jurisdiction of a Constitutional Court cannot be Invoked when an order under Section 148A(d) of the Income...
![Writ Jurisdiction cannot be Invoked when Order u/s 148A(d) Income Tax Act Culminated into Final Assessment Order: Calcutta HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Writ-Jurisdiction-Income-Tax-Act-Final-Assessment-Calcutta-highcourt-TAXSCAN-1.jpg "Writ Jurisdiction cannot be Invoked when Order u/s 148A(d) Income Tax Act Culminated into Final Assessment Order: Calcutta HC [Read Order]")
Reopening Assessment u/s 147 of Income Tax Act Quoting Wrong PAN: Calcutta HC orders to Produce Relevant Records [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court ordered to produce relevant records as reopening of assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was made after quoting wrong PAN number. By the writ petition,...
![Reopening Assessment u/s 147 of Income Tax Act Quoting Wrong PAN: Calcutta HC orders to Produce Relevant Records [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Reopening-Assessment-Income-Tax-Act-Wrong-PAN-PAN-Calcutta-High-Court-orders-to-Produce-Relevant-Records-Calcutta-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Reopening Assessment u/s 147 of Income Tax Act Quoting Wrong PAN: Calcutta HC orders to Produce Relevant Records [Read Order]")
CIT(A) passed Order not on Merits: ITAT Directs Re-Adjudication taking Cognizance of Evidences [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has directed re-adjudication taking cognizance of evidence as the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals (CIT(A)) passed order not on merits. ...
![CIT(A) passed Order not on Merits: ITAT Directs Re-Adjudication taking Cognizance of Evidences [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/CITA-Order-Merits-ITAT-Re-Adjudication-ITAT-Directs-Re-Adjudication-Cognizance-of-Evidences-Cognizance-ITAT-Directs-Re-Adjudication-taking-Cognizance-of-Evidences-Taxscan.jpg "CIT(A) passed Order not on Merits: ITAT Directs Re-Adjudication taking Cognizance of Evidences [Read Order]")
Bombay HC Quashes Assessment Notice u/s 148 Income Tax Act on Absence of Failure on part of assessee to Truly and Fully Disclose Material Fact [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court quashed assessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on absence of failure on the part of the assessee, Shree Realtors Private Limited, to truly and...
![Bombay HC Quashes Assessment Notice u/s 148 Income Tax Act on Absence of Failure on part of assessee to Truly and Fully Disclose Material Fact [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Bombay-HC-Quashes-Assessment-Notice-Income-Tax-Act-on-Absence-of-Failure-on-part-of-assessee-to-Truly-and-Fully-Disclose-Material-Fact-TAXSCAN.jpg "Bombay HC Quashes Assessment Notice u/s 148 Income Tax Act on Absence of Failure on part of assessee to Truly and Fully Disclose Material Fact [Read Order]")
Failure to file ITR bonafidely and witness no Loss to Revenue as Proper Tax was already Paid: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]
The Jaipur bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) set aside penalty of Rs.5000 under Section 271F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on grounds of non-filing of returns by the assessee bonafidely...
![Failure to file ITR bonafidely and witness no Loss to Revenue as Proper Tax was already Paid: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Failure-file-ITR-Loss-Revenue-Proper-Tax-already-Paid-ITAT-Penalty-taxscan-.jpg "Failure to file ITR bonafidely and witness no Loss to Revenue as Proper Tax was already Paid: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]")
Taxpayers must File Cross-objections within Time Limit: ITAT dismisses ICICI Bank's Cross-objection [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has dismissed a cross objection filed by ICICI Bank for being filed late and held that taxpayers must file cross-objections within the...
![Taxpayers must File Cross-objections within Time Limit: ITAT dismisses ICICI Banks Cross-objection [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Taxpayers-File-Cross-objections-Time-Limit-ITAT-dismisses-ICICI-Banks-Cross-objection-ICICI-Bank-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Taxpayers must File Cross-objections within Time Limit: ITAT dismisses ICICI Banks Cross-objection [Read Order]")
ITAT quashes Reassessment in respect of Accommodation Entry without provide proper approval u/s 151 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench quashed the reopening assessment in respect of accommodation entry without providing proper approval under Section 151 of Income Tax Act, 1961. ...
![ITAT quashes Reassessment in respect of Accommodation Entry without provide proper approval u/s 151 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/ITAT-quashes-Reassessment-ITAT-Reassessment-Accommodation-Entry-provide-proper-approval-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpg "ITAT quashes Reassessment in respect of Accommodation Entry without provide proper approval u/s 151 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")