![Mere Suspicious Information received from DDIT cant be a ground to raise Addition u/s 69B of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Mere-Suspicious-Information-DDIT-Addition-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Mere Suspicious Information received from DDIT cant be a ground to raise Addition u/s 69B of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
Mere Suspicious Information received from DDIT can't be a ground to raise Addition u/s 69B of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that mere suspicious information received from the Deputy Director of Income Tax...
![Penalty Levied by AO u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act Beyond Jurisdiction is not Sustainable: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-Jurisdiction-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Penalty Levied by AO u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act Beyond Jurisdiction is not Sustainable: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Addition Made by AO Towards Share Premium u/s 56(2)(viib) of Income Tax Act Already Offered to Tax by Assessee Before Settlement Commission: ITAT upholds Deletion of Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Addition-Made-by-AO-Towards-Share-Premium-Addition-AO-Share-Premium-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Addition Made by AO Towards Share Premium u/s 56(2)(viib) of Income Tax Act Already Offered to Tax by Assessee Before Settlement Commission: ITAT upholds Deletion of Addition [Read Order]")
![Non-Cooperation of Tax Consultant in Furnishing Details of Investment in Property: ITAT orders Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Tax-Non-Cooperation-Tax-Consultant-Non-Cooperation-of-Tax-Consultant-ITAT-taxscan-1.jpg "Non-Cooperation of Tax Consultant in Furnishing Details of Investment in Property: ITAT orders Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")
![Non-reply to Notice due to miscommunication between assessee and Tax Consultant: ITAT directs CIT(A) Denovo Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Non-reply-to-notice-notice-miscommunication-assessee-Tax-Consultant-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Non-reply to Notice due to miscommunication between assessee and Tax Consultant: ITAT directs CIT(A) Denovo Adjudication [Read Order]")
No Re-assessment Proceeding u/s 147 of Income Tax Act can be Initiated by AO Without any Tangible Material Showing Escape of Income: ITAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the Assessing Officer (AO) has initiated the re-assessment proceeding under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 in the absence of...
![No Re-assessment Proceeding u/s 147 of Income Tax Act can be Initiated by AO Without any Tangible Material Showing Escape of Income: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/No-Re-assessment-Proceeding-Initiated-by-AO-Tangible-Material-Showing-Escape-of-Income-ITAT-Income-Tax-Tangible-Material-Escape-of-Income-taxscan.jpg "No Re-assessment Proceeding u/s 147 of Income Tax Act can be Initiated by AO Without any Tangible Material Showing Escape of Income: ITAT [Read Order]")
AO Failed to Record Reason for Escape of Income due to Non-disclosure of Materials Facts by Assessee u/s 147 of Income Tax Act: ITAT Quashes Re-Assessment [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the Assessing Officer failed to record reason for occurance of escape of income due to failure on part of assessee to disclose all...
![AO Failed to Record Reason for Escape of Income due to Non-disclosure of Materials Facts by Assessee u/s 147 of Income Tax Act: ITAT Quashes Re-Assessment [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/AO-Income-AO-Failed-to-Record-Reason-for-Escape-of-Income-Non-disclosure-of-Materials-Facts-by-Assessee-taxscan.jpg "AO Failed to Record Reason for Escape of Income due to Non-disclosure of Materials Facts by Assessee u/s 147 of Income Tax Act: ITAT Quashes Re-Assessment [Read Order]")
Partnership Firm not entitled to Tax Deduction on LTCG u/s 48(i) of Income Tax Act for Mortgaging Property as Collateral Security: ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that a partnership firm is not entitled to the tax deduction on Long-term capital gain (LTCG) under Section 48(i) of the Income Tax...
![Partnership Firm not entitled to Tax Deduction on LTCG u/s 48(i) of Income Tax Act for Mortgaging Property as Collateral Security: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Partnership-Firm-not-entitled-to-Tax-Deduction-on-LTCG-Income-Tax-Act-Tax-Deduction-on-LTCG-Mortgaging-Property-Collateral-Security-ITAT-Tax-Deduction-Partnership-Firm-taxscan.jpg "Partnership Firm not entitled to Tax Deduction on LTCG u/s 48(i) of Income Tax Act for Mortgaging Property as Collateral Security: ITAT [Read Order]")
Mere Mistake in Form 35 does not result in Deficient Appeal: ITAT grants another Opportunity to rectify Mistake [Read Order]
The Indore bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the mere mistake in form 35 does not result in a deficient appeal hence allowed one more opportunity to the assessee to rectify...
![Mere Mistake in Form 35 does not result in Deficient Appeal: ITAT grants another Opportunity to rectify Mistake [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Mere-Mistake-Appeal-Mere-Mistake-in-Form-35-does-not-result-in-Deficient-Appeal-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Mere Mistake in Form 35 does not result in Deficient Appeal: ITAT grants another Opportunity to rectify Mistake [Read Order]")
No scope for Reassessment on issue which is Subject Matter of Appeal before Appellate Authority: ITAT [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that as per provisions of 3rd proviso to Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Assessing Officer (AO) may assessee or...
![No scope for Reassessment on issue which is Subject Matter of Appeal before Appellate Authority: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Reassessment-Subject-Matter-of-Appeal-Appeal-Appellate-Authority-ITAT-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "No scope for Reassessment on issue which is Subject Matter of Appeal before Appellate Authority: ITAT [Read Order]")
Calcutta HC Dismisses Writ Petition as no Objection filed before AO against Assessment Order u/s 147 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court dismissed a writ petition as no objection filed before the Assessing Officer (AO) against an assessment order passed under Section147 of Income Tax Act, 1961. By the writ...
![Calcutta HC Dismisses Writ Petition as no Objection filed before AO against Assessment Order u/s 147 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Calcutta-HC-Writ-Petition-Objection-filed-AO-Assessment-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpeg "Calcutta HC Dismisses Writ Petition as no Objection filed before AO against Assessment Order u/s 147 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
Writ Jurisdiction cannot be Invoked when Order u/s 148A(d) Income Tax Act Culminated into Final Assessment Order: Calcutta HC [Read Order]
In a major decision a Single Judge Bench of the Calcutta High Court observed that the writ jurisdiction of a Constitutional Court cannot be Invoked when an order under Section 148A(d) of the Income...
![Writ Jurisdiction cannot be Invoked when Order u/s 148A(d) Income Tax Act Culminated into Final Assessment Order: Calcutta HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Writ-Jurisdiction-Income-Tax-Act-Final-Assessment-Calcutta-highcourt-TAXSCAN-1.jpg "Writ Jurisdiction cannot be Invoked when Order u/s 148A(d) Income Tax Act Culminated into Final Assessment Order: Calcutta HC [Read Order]")