![Claim of Deduction by Mistake against Other Property which was otherwise Considerable: ITAT Allows Deduction as to Cost of Improvement u/s 48(ii) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Claim-of-Deduction-by-Mistake-Property-otherwise-Considerable-ITAT-Allows-Deduction-Cost-of-Improvement-.jpg "Claim of Deduction by Mistake against Other Property which was otherwise Considerable: ITAT Allows Deduction as to Cost of Improvement u/s 48(ii) [Read Order]")
Claim of Deduction by Mistake against Other Property which was otherwise Considerable: ITAT Allows Deduction as to Cost of Improvement u/s 48(ii) [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has allowed the deduction as to cost of improvement under Section 48(ii) of Income Tax Act as...
![Documentary Evidences Furnished by Assessee to Claim Loss Suffered not held to be Bogus/False by AO during Assessment or Penalty Proceedings : ITAT Deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Documentary-Evidences-Furnished-Assessee-Claim-Loss-Suffered-Bogus-False-AO-during-Assessment-Penalty-Proceedings-ITAT-Deletes-Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Documentary Evidences Furnished by Assessee to Claim Loss Suffered not held to be Bogus/False by AO during Assessment or Penalty Proceedings : ITAT Deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
![AO has no Power to Reopen Assessment when an Order is passed by Income Tax Settlement Commission u/s 245D of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/AO-has-no-Power-Reopen-Assessment-Order-is-passed-Income-Tax-Settlement-Commission-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "AO has no Power to Reopen Assessment when an Order is passed by Income Tax Settlement Commission u/s 245D of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
Failure of Assessee to Furnish any Evidence to Support Claim of Deduction u/s 54F of Income Tax Act: ITAT Remands Matter to AO for Re-adjudication [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of Income Tax held that the assessee was not present before the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals [CIT(A)] in the appellate proceedings and has not filed any document to...
![Failure of Assessee to Furnish any Evidence to Support Claim of Deduction u/s 54F of Income Tax Act: ITAT Remands Matter to AO for Re-adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Failure-of-Assessee-to-Furnish-any-Evidence-to-Support-Claim-of-Deduction-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-Remands-Matter-to-AO-for-Re-adjudication-TAXSCAN.jpg "Failure of Assessee to Furnish any Evidence to Support Claim of Deduction u/s 54F of Income Tax Act: ITAT Remands Matter to AO for Re-adjudication [Read Order]")
Change of Opinion does not Constitute Justification to Believe Escapement of Income: Bombay HC quashes Assessment Order against Knight Riders Sports [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court quashed assessment order against Knight Riders Sports Pvt. Ltd, the petitioner and noted that the change of opinion does not constitute justification to believe escapement of...
![Change of Opinion does not Constitute Justification to Believe Escapement of Income: Bombay HC quashes Assessment Order against Knight Riders Sports [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Change-of-Opinion-Constitute-Justification-Believe-Escapement-Income-Bombay-HC-Assessment-Order-Knight-Riders-Sports-TAXSCAN.jpg "Change of Opinion does not Constitute Justification to Believe Escapement of Income: Bombay HC quashes Assessment Order against Knight Riders Sports [Read Order]")
4 days Time to Reply SCN is not Valid as per mandatory Provision under Income Tax Act: Kerala HC quashes Reassessment Order [Read Order]
In a significant case, the Kerala High Court quashed the reassessment order as the 4 days time allowed to file the reply to the show cause notice (SCN) is not valid as per mandatory provision under...
![4 days Time to Reply SCN is not Valid as per mandatory Provision under Income Tax Act: Kerala HC quashes Reassessment Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/4-days-Time-Reply-SCN-mandatory-Provision-Income-Tax-Act-Kerala-HC-Reassessment-Order-TAXSCAN.jpg "4 days Time to Reply SCN is not Valid as per mandatory Provision under Income Tax Act: Kerala HC quashes Reassessment Order [Read Order]")
![AO cant impose an Addition without mentioning any Provision of Statute: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/AO-impose-Addition-mentioning-Provision-Statute-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "AO cant impose an Addition without mentioning any Provision of Statute: ITAT [Read Order]")
Bombay HC set aside Assessment Order u/s 148 in Absence of Evidence proving Income Escapement in Assessment [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court HC set aside an assessment order under section 148 of Income ncome Tax Act,1961 in the absence of evidence proving income escapement in assessment. Vaman Prestressing Co....
![Bombay HC set aside Assessment Order u/s 148 in Absence of Evidence proving Income Escapement in Assessment [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Bombay-High-Court-assessment-order-Absence-of-Evidence-proving-Income-Escapement-in-Assessment-taxscan.jpeg "Bombay HC set aside Assessment Order u/s 148 in Absence of Evidence proving Income Escapement in Assessment [Read Order]")
Failure to Prove Non-disclosure and Reasons for Reopening Assessment: Bombay HC quashes Proceedings u/s 148 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]
“There is not even a whisper in the entire communication trail as to what was not disclosed”, the Bombay High Court observed while quashing the penalty proceedings against the assessee under Section...
![Failure to Prove Non-disclosure and Reasons for Reopening Assessment: Bombay HC quashes Proceedings u/s 148 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Failure-Failure-to-Prove-Non-disclosure-and-Reasons-for-Reopening-Assessment-Non-disclosure-Bombay-High-Court-taxscan.jpeg "Failure to Prove Non-disclosure and Reasons for Reopening Assessment: Bombay HC quashes Proceedings u/s 148 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
Ex-Parte Assessment Orders passed without considering Additional Evidence filed under Rule 46A of Income Tax Rules: ITAT directs Readjudication [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Ahmedabad bench while directing readjudication in respect of assessment order observed that the assessment order was passed without considering the additional...
![Ex-Parte Assessment Orders passed without considering Additional Evidence filed under Rule 46A of Income Tax Rules: ITAT directs Readjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Ex-Parte-Assessment-Orders-Additional-Evidence-Rule-46A-of-Income-Tax-Rules-ITAT-Readjudication-taxscan.jpg "Ex-Parte Assessment Orders passed without considering Additional Evidence filed under Rule 46A of Income Tax Rules: ITAT directs Readjudication [Read Order]")