Communication and Notice for Reassessment Proceedings sent to e-mail id registered with Income Tax Department: Kerala High Court dismisses Writ Petition [Read Order]
In a significant case, the Kerala High Court, while dismissing a writ petition, observed that communication and notices for reassessment proceedings...
![AO has no Power to Reopen Assessment when an Order is passed by Income Tax Settlement Commission u/s 245D of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/AO-has-no-Power-Reopen-Assessment-Order-is-passed-Income-Tax-Settlement-Commission-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "AO has no Power to Reopen Assessment when an Order is passed by Income Tax Settlement Commission u/s 245D of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Failure of Assessee to Furnish any Evidence to Support Claim of Deduction u/s 54F of Income Tax Act: ITAT Remands Matter to AO for Re-adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Failure-of-Assessee-to-Furnish-any-Evidence-to-Support-Claim-of-Deduction-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-Remands-Matter-to-AO-for-Re-adjudication-TAXSCAN.jpg "Failure of Assessee to Furnish any Evidence to Support Claim of Deduction u/s 54F of Income Tax Act: ITAT Remands Matter to AO for Re-adjudication [Read Order]")
![Change of Opinion does not Constitute Justification to Believe Escapement of Income: Bombay HC quashes Assessment Order against Knight Riders Sports [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Change-of-Opinion-Constitute-Justification-Believe-Escapement-Income-Bombay-HC-Assessment-Order-Knight-Riders-Sports-TAXSCAN.jpg "Change of Opinion does not Constitute Justification to Believe Escapement of Income: Bombay HC quashes Assessment Order against Knight Riders Sports [Read Order]")
![4 days Time to Reply SCN is not Valid as per mandatory Provision under Income Tax Act: Kerala HC quashes Reassessment Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/4-days-Time-Reply-SCN-mandatory-Provision-Income-Tax-Act-Kerala-HC-Reassessment-Order-TAXSCAN.jpg "4 days Time to Reply SCN is not Valid as per mandatory Provision under Income Tax Act: Kerala HC quashes Reassessment Order [Read Order]")
![AO cant impose an Addition without mentioning any Provision of Statute: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/AO-impose-Addition-mentioning-Provision-Statute-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "AO cant impose an Addition without mentioning any Provision of Statute: ITAT [Read Order]")
Bombay HC set aside Assessment Order u/s 148 in Absence of Evidence proving Income Escapement in Assessment [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court HC set aside an assessment order under section 148 of Income ncome Tax Act,1961 in the absence of evidence proving income escapement in assessment. Vaman Prestressing Co....
![Bombay HC set aside Assessment Order u/s 148 in Absence of Evidence proving Income Escapement in Assessment [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Bombay-High-Court-assessment-order-Absence-of-Evidence-proving-Income-Escapement-in-Assessment-taxscan.jpeg "Bombay HC set aside Assessment Order u/s 148 in Absence of Evidence proving Income Escapement in Assessment [Read Order]")
Failure to Prove Non-disclosure and Reasons for Reopening Assessment: Bombay HC quashes Proceedings u/s 148 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]
“There is not even a whisper in the entire communication trail as to what was not disclosed”, the Bombay High Court observed while quashing the penalty proceedings against the assessee under Section...
![Failure to Prove Non-disclosure and Reasons for Reopening Assessment: Bombay HC quashes Proceedings u/s 148 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Failure-Failure-to-Prove-Non-disclosure-and-Reasons-for-Reopening-Assessment-Non-disclosure-Bombay-High-Court-taxscan.jpeg "Failure to Prove Non-disclosure and Reasons for Reopening Assessment: Bombay HC quashes Proceedings u/s 148 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
Ex-Parte Assessment Orders passed without considering Additional Evidence filed under Rule 46A of Income Tax Rules: ITAT directs Readjudication [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Ahmedabad bench while directing readjudication in respect of assessment order observed that the assessment order was passed without considering the additional...
![Ex-Parte Assessment Orders passed without considering Additional Evidence filed under Rule 46A of Income Tax Rules: ITAT directs Readjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Ex-Parte-Assessment-Orders-Additional-Evidence-Rule-46A-of-Income-Tax-Rules-ITAT-Readjudication-taxscan.jpg "Ex-Parte Assessment Orders passed without considering Additional Evidence filed under Rule 46A of Income Tax Rules: ITAT directs Readjudication [Read Order]")
Reopening of Assessment after Four Years while there was No New Tangible Material Evidence: ITAT quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the assumption of jurisdiction for reopening the assessment by the Assessing Officer is bad in law and notice under Section 148 of...
![Reopening of Assessment after Four Years while there was No New Tangible Material Evidence: ITAT quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Reopening-Assessment-Tangible-Material-Evidence-ITAT-Assessment-Order-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Reopening of Assessment after Four Years while there was No New Tangible Material Evidence: ITAT quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]")
Ex-parte Addition on Unexplained Investment: ITAT directs Re adjudication of Addition towards source of Investment in Purchase of Immovable Property [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi bench directed readjudication in respect of additions made under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 towards source of investment in the...
![Ex-parte Addition on Unexplained Investment: ITAT directs Re adjudication of Addition towards source of Investment in Purchase of Immovable Property [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Ex-parte-Unexplained-Investment-ITAT-Re-adjudication-Addition-Investment-Purchase-Immovable-Property-TAXSCAN.jpg "Ex-parte Addition on Unexplained Investment: ITAT directs Re adjudication of Addition towards source of Investment in Purchase of Immovable Property [Read Order]")
Failure to Distinct between Electric Fitting Installed in Factory and Office Premises: ITAT Allows Higher Depreciation to Office Electric Fittings [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has allowed higher depreciation to office electronic fittings on failure to distinguish between the electric fitting installed in factory and...
![Failure to Distinct between Electric Fitting Installed in Factory and Office Premises: ITAT Allows Higher Depreciation to Office Electric Fittings [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Failure-Failure-to-Distinct-between-Electric-Fitting-Installed-in-Factory-and-Office-Premises-Electric-Fitting-Installed-in-Factory-Office-Premises-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Failure to Distinct between Electric Fitting Installed in Factory and Office Premises: ITAT Allows Higher Depreciation to Office Electric Fittings [Read Order]")