Sale Deed Does not Verify Classification of Land as Agricultural for Taxation Purposes: Delhi HC [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court in a significant case has held that sale deed is not a document issued by the revenue authorities or any government...
![ITAT quashes CIT(E) Order, upholds Nil Income for Mother Theresa Educational Society due to Proper Fund Application and Disallowed Depreciation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/ITAT-ITAT-Visakhapatnam-ITAT-Quashes-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Mother-Theresa-Educational-Society-Nil-Income-CITE-Order-taxscan.jpg "ITAT quashes CIT(E) Order, upholds Nil Income for Mother Theresa Educational Society due to Proper Fund Application and Disallowed Depreciation [Read Order]")
![Filing Fee for Increased Share Capital Classified as Revenue Expenditure: ITAT Upholds AOs Decision [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Legal-Professional-charges-incurred-towards-business-to-be-treated-Revenue-Expenditure-ITAT-RAXSCAN.jpg "Filing Fee for Increased Share Capital Classified as Revenue Expenditure: ITAT Upholds AOs Decision [Read Order]")
![Finds Addition Too Harsh: ITAT directs Re-examination of PCITs Rs. 3.4 cr Addition due to Sales Discrepancy [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-ITAT-Cuttack-ITAT-directs-Re-examination-PCIT-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Principal-Commissioner-of-Income-Tax-Sales-Discrepancy-Finds-Addition-Too-Harsh-ITAT-news-taxscan.jpeg "Finds Addition Too Harsh: ITAT directs Re-examination of PCITs Rs. 3.4 cr Addition due to Sales Discrepancy [Read Order]")
![Inadequate Inquiry into Rs. 9.30 Crore Property Investment: ITAT Upholds PCITs Revision Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-ITAT-Upholds-PCIT-ITAT-Upholds-Revision-Order-Investment-Taxscan.jpg "Inadequate Inquiry into Rs. 9.30 Crore Property Investment: ITAT Upholds PCITs Revision Order [Read Order]")
PCIT Adds Rs.1.67 Crore Doubtful Debts to Book Profit u/s 115JB: ITAT Reverses Recognizing Actual Write-Off [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) reverses Principal Commissioner of Income Tax addition of Rs. 1,67,51,026 from doubtful debts to book profit under section 115JB of the...
![PCIT Adds Rs.1.67 Crore Doubtful Debts to Book Profit u/s 115JB: ITAT Reverses Recognizing Actual Write-Off [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-ITAT-bangalore-PCIT-Adds-Rs.1.67-Crore-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-section-115JB-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpg "PCIT Adds Rs.1.67 Crore Doubtful Debts to Book Profit u/s 115JB: ITAT Reverses Recognizing Actual Write-Off [Read Order]")
AO’s failure to Investigate Agricultural Income, Land Purchase Sources, and Unexplained Bank Deposits: ITAT upholds PCIT Order [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax's (PCIT) order, agreeing that the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to conduct proper...
![AO’s failure to Investigate Agricultural Income, Land Purchase Sources, and Unexplained Bank Deposits: ITAT upholds PCIT Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/AO-Agricultural-Income-Agriculture-Land-Purchase-ITAT-Land-Purchase-Sources-Bank-Bank-Deposits-tax-news-AOs-Failure-itat-news-agriculture-news-land-purchase-news-ao-news-taxscan.jpg "AO’s failure to Investigate Agricultural Income, Land Purchase Sources, and Unexplained Bank Deposits: ITAT upholds PCIT Order [Read Order]")
Income Tax Orders Violating Natural Justice Deemed Non-Est in Law: Madras HC Remands Matter to PCIT [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court remanded the matter to the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax ( PCIT ) as the income tax order passed violated natural justice and was deemed non-est in...
![Income Tax Orders Violating Natural Justice Deemed Non-Est in Law: Madras HC Remands Matter to PCIT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Income-Tax-Natural-Justice-Madras-HC-Madras-High-Court-PCIT-madras-high-court-on-pcit-madras-high-court-about-pcit-Violation-of-Natural-Justice-taxnews-taxscan.jpg "Income Tax Orders Violating Natural Justice Deemed Non-Est in Law: Madras HC Remands Matter to PCIT [Read Order]")
Lack of Conclusive Evidence: ITAT quashes Revision Order u/s 263 alleging Cash Payment [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) recently quashed the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax ( PCIT ) revision order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The...
![Lack of Conclusive Evidence: ITAT quashes Revision Order u/s 263 alleging Cash Payment [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Itat-Revision-Order-Cash-Payment-Lack-of-Conclusive-Evidence-itat-on-revision-order-itat-about-revision-order-itat-news-taxnews-taxscan.jpg "Lack of Conclusive Evidence: ITAT quashes Revision Order u/s 263 alleging Cash Payment [Read Order]")
Contribution of Rs. 212.52 Crores to CAF amounts to Revenue Expenditure: Bombay HC Rules in Favour of Tata Steel Limited [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court in a ruling in favour of Tata Steel limited held that a contribution of Rs. 212.52 Crores to the Compensatory Afforestation Fund (“CAF”) amounts to Revenue Expenditure. The...
ITAT rules Assessee not Liable for Payee's Non-Response to AO Notice, Quashes Revision Order [Read Order]
In a recent ruling the Indore bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) ruled that the assessee not liable for payee's non-response to Assessing Officer Notice, quashed the revision order. ...
![ITAT rules Assessee not Liable for Payees Non-Response to AO Notice, Quashes Revision Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ITAT-Income-Tax-ITAT-Indore-Revision-Order-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT rules Assessee not Liable for Payees Non-Response to AO Notice, Quashes Revision Order [Read Order]")
Appeal against Revision Order under Income Tax Act: Kerala HC directs to Stays proceedings till Final order of Appeal [Read Order]
The Kerala High Court directed to stay proceedings under the Income Tax Act, 1961 till the passing of the final order of appeal. The petitioner already filed an appeal against the revision order...
