![No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act can be Imposed when Assessee Sufficiently Proved the Bonafides of Losses Claimed: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/No-Penalty-Income-tax-Act-Imposed-Assessee-Sufficiently-Bonafides-Losses-Claimed-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act can be Imposed when Assessee Sufficiently Proved the Bonafides of Losses Claimed: ITAT [Read Order]")
No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act can be Imposed when Assessee Sufficiently Proved the Bonafides of Losses Claimed: ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that if bona fides of the losses claimed are sufficiently proved by the assessee and the...
![Setting aside Penalty Order Leads to Automatic Quashing of Prosecution u/s 276C (1) of Income Tax Act: Jharkhand HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Setting-aside-Penalty-Order-Penalty-Order-Automatic-quashing-of-Prosecution-Prosecution-Income-Tax-Act-Jharkhand-High-Court-taxscan.jpg "Setting aside Penalty Order Leads to Automatic Quashing of Prosecution u/s 276C (1) of Income Tax Act: Jharkhand HC [Read Order]")
![Undisclosed Income Taxed in a Flagship Company cannot be Taxed again when applied as Share Capital in Another Company: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Undisclosed-Income-Taxed-Flagship-Company-Taxed-applied-Share-Capital-Company-Delhi-HC-TAXSCAN.jpg "Undisclosed Income Taxed in a Flagship Company cannot be Taxed again when applied as Share Capital in Another Company: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
![Mere Wrong Claim by itself not Ipso Facto invite Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act if Bona Fides of Assessee’s Actions are Beyond Reasonable Doubt: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Ipso-Facto-Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-Bona-Fides-of-Assessees-Actions-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Mere Wrong Claim by itself not Ipso Facto invite Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act if Bona Fides of Assessee’s Actions are Beyond Reasonable Doubt: ITAT [Read Order]")
![No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Income Tax Act shall levied if Bonafide Assessee revised and added Interest Income: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/No-Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-levied-bonafide-assessee-Interest-Income-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Income Tax Act shall levied if Bonafide Assessee revised and added Interest Income: ITAT [Read Order]")
Determination of Income of assessee on certain Estimate not sufficient to constitute Concealed Income: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai bench held that determination of income of assessee on certain estimate was not sufficient to constitute concealed income. Hence, the bench deleted the...
![Determination of Income of assessee on certain Estimate not sufficient to constitute Concealed Income: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Determination-Income-assessee-Estimate-sufficient-constitute-Concealed-Income-ITAT-Penalty-TAXSCAN.jpg "Determination of Income of assessee on certain Estimate not sufficient to constitute Concealed Income: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]")
Person failing to furnish Return of Income is deemed to have concealed particulars of his income: ITAT upholds Penalty [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that if a person fails to furnish return of income then the assessee is deemed to have concealed the particulars of his income. ...
![Person failing to furnish Return of Income is deemed to have concealed particulars of his income: ITAT upholds Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Person-failing-to-furnish-return-of-income-return-of-income-income-ITAT-ITAT-upholds-penalty-taxscan.jpg "Person failing to furnish Return of Income is deemed to have concealed particulars of his income: ITAT upholds Penalty [Read Order]")
Penalty Notice Issued u/s 274 of Income Tax Act not Specifying Charge against Assessee is Invalid: ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that show cause notice issued by the Assessing Officer (AO)Â under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act,1961 is...
![Penalty Notice Issued u/s 274 of Income Tax Act not Specifying Charge against Assessee is Invalid: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Penalty-Notice-Income-Tax-Act-Specifying-Charge-Assessee-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Penalty Notice Issued u/s 274 of Income Tax Act not Specifying Charge against Assessee is Invalid: ITAT [Read Order]")
Interest income covered under Article 8(3) of India-France DTAA not taxable for out of funds fixed deposits connected with aircraft under Article 8(1): ITAT Grants Relief to Air France [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the impugned income is not taxable in India as it is covered under Article 8(2) r.w. Article 8(1) of India-France Double Tax...
![Interest income covered under Article 8(3) of India-France DTAA not taxable for out of funds fixed deposits connected with aircraft under Article 8(1): ITAT Grants Relief to Air France [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Interest-income-Interest-income-Air-France-DTAA-taxscan.jpg "Interest income covered under Article 8(3) of India-France DTAA not taxable for out of funds fixed deposits connected with aircraft under Article 8(1): ITAT Grants Relief to Air France [Read Order]")
Difference in Perception of Viewing Transaction not Amount to Furnishing of Inaccurate Particulars: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted the penalty holding that the difference in perception of viewing transactions could not amount to inaccurate particulars. ...
![Difference in Perception of Viewing Transaction not Amount to Furnishing of Inaccurate Particulars: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Difference-Perception-Viewing-Transaction-Amount-Furnishing-Inaccurate-Particulars-ITAT-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "Difference in Perception of Viewing Transaction not Amount to Furnishing of Inaccurate Particulars: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]")
Enhancement of Disallowance u/s 43B of Income Tax Act made Voluntarily: Delhi HC confirms Penalty Order of ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court confirmed penalty of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), on the ground of enhancement of disallowance under Section 43B of Income Tax Act, 1961 made voluntarily. The...
![Enhancement of Disallowance u/s 43B of Income Tax Act made Voluntarily: Delhi HC confirms Penalty Order of ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/ITAT-Disallowance-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Act-made-Voluntarily-Delhi-HC-confirms-Penalty-Order-of-ITAT-Delhi-High-Court-Penalty-Order-Penalty-Taxscan.jpg "Enhancement of Disallowance u/s 43B of Income Tax Act made Voluntarily: Delhi HC confirms Penalty Order of ITAT [Read Order]")
AO Fails to Clarify Concealment of Particulars of Income or Furnished Inaccurate Particulars: Delhi HC quashes 300% Penalty [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court quashed the 300% penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on grounds that the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to clarify the concealment of particulars...
![AO Fails to Clarify Concealment of Particulars of Income or Furnished Inaccurate Particulars: Delhi HC quashes 300% Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/AO-Fails-to-Clarify-Concealment-of-Particulars-of-Income-Delhi-Highcourt-quashes-300-Penalty-Penalty-Concealment-of-Particulars-of-Income-Delhi-Highcourt-taxscan.jpg "AO Fails to Clarify Concealment of Particulars of Income or Furnished Inaccurate Particulars: Delhi HC quashes 300% Penalty [Read Order]")