![Taxpayer is Co-Owner of Bank Account, No Concealment of Income: ITAT deletes penalty u/s 271(1) (c) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/ITAT-Income-tax-appellate-tribunal-income-tax-act-income-tax-Tax-news-TAXSCAN.jpg "Taxpayer is Co-Owner of Bank Account, No Concealment of Income: ITAT deletes penalty u/s 271(1) (c) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
Taxpayer is Co-Owner of Bank Account, No Concealment of Income: ITAT deletes penalty u/s 271(1) (c) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) deleted the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 observing...
![Failure to find any particulars furnished in ITR to be Inaccurate: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271 (1) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Failure-particulars-furnished-ITR-Inaccurate-ITAT-Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpg "Failure to find any particulars furnished in ITR to be Inaccurate: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271 (1) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
![Non-Awareness of Tax Payment: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Non-Awareness-of-Tax-Payment-ITAT-deletes-Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Non-Awareness of Tax Payment: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
![Bonafide Mistake in Computing Income Tax is not Furnishing Inaccurate Particulars or Concealment of Income : ITAT Deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Bonafide-Mistake-Computing-Income-Tax-Furnishing-Inaccurate-Particulars-Concealment-of-Income-ITAT-Deletes-Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpg "Bonafide Mistake in Computing Income Tax is not Furnishing Inaccurate Particulars or Concealment of Income : ITAT Deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
![ITAT Upholds the Penalty Order u/s 271of Income Tax Act due to Concealment of Particular of Income by Assessee [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/ITAT-Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Concealment-Concealment-of-Particular-of-Income-by-Assessee-ITAT-Upholds-the-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Upholds the Penalty Order u/s 271of Income Tax Act due to Concealment of Particular of Income by Assessee [Read Order]")
No Concealment of Income or Furnishing of Inaccurate Particulars: ITAT upholds Deletion of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty could be imposed under section 271(1)(c) as no concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars was done...
![No Concealment of Income or Furnishing of Inaccurate Particulars: ITAT upholds Deletion of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/No-Concealment-of-Income-or-Furnishing-of-Inaccurate-Particulars-Income-Inaccurate-Particulars-ITAT-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "No Concealment of Income or Furnishing of Inaccurate Particulars: ITAT upholds Deletion of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]")
Relief To Kotak Mahindra Bank: Supreme Court Upholds Order of Settlement Commission Granting Immunity From Penalty Under Income Tax [Read Order]
The Supreme Court of India upheld the order of the settlement commission granting immunity to Kotak Mahindra from penalty under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellant-assessee, Kotak Mahindra...
![Relief To Kotak Mahindra Bank: Supreme Court Upholds Order of Settlement Commission Granting Immunity From Penalty Under Income Tax [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Relief-Kotak-Mahindra-Bank-Supreme-Court-Settlement-Commission-Granting-Immunity-Penalty-Income-Tax-TAXSCAN.jpg "Relief To Kotak Mahindra Bank: Supreme Court Upholds Order of Settlement Commission Granting Immunity From Penalty Under Income Tax [Read Order]")
No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act can be Imposed when Assessee Sufficiently Proved the Bonafides of Losses Claimed: ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that if bona fides of the losses claimed are sufficiently proved by the assessee and the onus has been primarily discharged on the...
![No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act can be Imposed when Assessee Sufficiently Proved the Bonafides of Losses Claimed: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/No-Penalty-Income-tax-Act-Imposed-Assessee-Sufficiently-Bonafides-Losses-Claimed-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act can be Imposed when Assessee Sufficiently Proved the Bonafides of Losses Claimed: ITAT [Read Order]")
Setting aside Penalty Order Leads to Automatic Quashing of Prosecution u/s 276C (1) of Income Tax Act: Jharkhand HC [Read Order]
In a major decision a Single Bench of the Jharkhand High Court observed that setting aside penalty order leads to automatic quashing of prosecution under Section 276C (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961....
![Setting aside Penalty Order Leads to Automatic Quashing of Prosecution u/s 276C (1) of Income Tax Act: Jharkhand HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Setting-aside-Penalty-Order-Penalty-Order-Automatic-quashing-of-Prosecution-Prosecution-Income-Tax-Act-Jharkhand-High-Court-taxscan.jpg "Setting aside Penalty Order Leads to Automatic Quashing of Prosecution u/s 276C (1) of Income Tax Act: Jharkhand HC [Read Order]")
Undisclosed Income Taxed in a Flagship Company cannot be Taxed again when applied as Share Capital in Another Company: Delhi HC [Read Order]
In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court noted that the undisclosed income in question, which is the matter of the current dispute, has already been subjected to taxation in the accounts of the...
![Undisclosed Income Taxed in a Flagship Company cannot be Taxed again when applied as Share Capital in Another Company: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Undisclosed-Income-Taxed-Flagship-Company-Taxed-applied-Share-Capital-Company-Delhi-HC-TAXSCAN.jpg "Undisclosed Income Taxed in a Flagship Company cannot be Taxed again when applied as Share Capital in Another Company: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
Mere Wrong Claim by itself not Ipso Facto invite Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act if Bona Fides of Assessee’s Actions are Beyond Reasonable Doubt: ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that mere wrong claim by itself would not ipso facto invite the imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act...
![Mere Wrong Claim by itself not Ipso Facto invite Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act if Bona Fides of Assessee’s Actions are Beyond Reasonable Doubt: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Ipso-Facto-Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-Bona-Fides-of-Assessees-Actions-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Mere Wrong Claim by itself not Ipso Facto invite Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act if Bona Fides of Assessee’s Actions are Beyond Reasonable Doubt: ITAT [Read Order]")
No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Income Tax Act shall levied if Bonafide Assessee revised and added Interest Income: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi bench held that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act should not be levied if the assessee bonafide revised and added the interest...
![No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Income Tax Act shall levied if Bonafide Assessee revised and added Interest Income: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/No-Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-levied-bonafide-assessee-Interest-Income-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Income Tax Act shall levied if Bonafide Assessee revised and added Interest Income: ITAT [Read Order]")