Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![No Payment made above Purchase Price of Asset: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/payment-purchase-price-of-asset-ITAT-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "No Payment made above Purchase Price of Asset: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]")
No Payment made above Purchase Price of Asset: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad set aside penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act,1961 as there was no...
![Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) not leviable on Bonafide Mistake: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Penalty-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) not leviable on Bonafide Mistake: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Once Income Declared and Income Tax Return Filed, Penalty u/s 271 (1) (C) not to be Later Levied: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Income-Return-Penalty-ITAT.jpg "Once Income Declared and Income Tax Return Filed, Penalty u/s 271 (1) (C) not to be Later Levied: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Disallowance of Expenditure on Estimated or Notional basis does not attract Penalty provision u/s 271: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Disallowance-Expenditure-Notional-basis-Penalty-provision-taxscan.jpg "Disallowance of Expenditure on Estimated or Notional basis does not attract Penalty provision u/s 271: ITAT [Read Order]")
![ITAT sets aside Penalty Order on existence of Ambiguity for AO on Charge u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/ITAT-penalty-existence-ambiguity-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT sets aside Penalty Order on existence of Ambiguity for AO on Charge u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]")
![Penalty can be levied only on Charges for which Penalty proceedings were initiated: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Penalty-proceedings-ITAT-taxscan.jpeg "Penalty can be levied only on Charges for which Penalty proceedings were initiated: ITAT [Read Order]")
No Penalty u/s 271C when delay in Filing Appeal occurred due to Ambiguity on direction contained in Statutory Document: ITAT [Read Order]
No Penalty u/s 271C when delay in filing appeal occurred due to ambiguity on direction contained in statutory document, so was held by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), New Delhi. The...
![No Penalty u/s 271C when delay in Filing Appeal occurred due to Ambiguity on direction contained in Statutory Document: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Penalty-appeal-statutory-document-ITAT-taxscan.jpeg "No Penalty u/s 271C when delay in Filing Appeal occurred due to Ambiguity on direction contained in Statutory Document: ITAT [Read Order]")
Notice u/s 274 Fails to specify Concealment or Furnishing Inaccurate Particulars of Income: ITAT deletes Penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench presided by Mr. N.K. Billaiya, Accountant Member, and Mr. N.K. Choudhry, Judicial Member has deleted the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c)...
![Notice u/s 274 Fails to specify Concealment or Furnishing Inaccurate Particulars of Income: ITAT deletes Penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Notice-Concealment-Income-ITAT-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "Notice u/s 274 Fails to specify Concealment or Furnishing Inaccurate Particulars of Income: ITAT deletes Penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]")
![ITAT deletes Penalty since Non-Deduction of TDS due to Absence of Invoices [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/ITAT-Penalty-Non-Deduction-TDS-Absence-Invoices-Taxscan.jpeg "ITAT deletes Penalty since Non-Deduction of TDS due to Absence of Invoices [Read Order]")
Disallowance made by Interpreting Revenue Expenditure as Capital Loss not Sustained: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Delhi held that interpretation of the transaction of loss of security in the nature of revenue expenditure as a capital loss, not allowable against the...
![Disallowance made by Interpreting Revenue Expenditure as Capital Loss not Sustained: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Revenue-Expenditure-Bombay-HC-Taxscan.jpg "Disallowance made by Interpreting Revenue Expenditure as Capital Loss not Sustained: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Penalty Proceedings Initiated without Requisite Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Penalty-Proceedings-Penalty-Penalty-Proceedings-Initiated-without-Requisite-Satisfaction-Requisite-Satisfaction-ITAT-Quashes-Penalty-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Penalty Proceedings Initiated without Requisite Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penalty [Read Order]")
![Additions made on Estimation Basis: ITAT directs AO to delete Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Additions-Estimation-Basis-Penalty-AO-Assessing-Officer-ITAT-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Additions made on Estimation Basis: ITAT directs AO to delete Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]")