![No Penalty can be Levied u/s 271D of Income Tax Act without any Evident Reason: ITAT dismisses Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/ITAT-Penalty-No-Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-Evident-Reason-income-tax-act-taxscan.jpg "No Penalty can be Levied u/s 271D of Income Tax Act without any Evident Reason: ITAT dismisses Appeal [Read Order]")
No Penalty can be Levied u/s 271D of Income Tax Act without any Evident Reason: ITAT dismisses Appeal [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty can be imposed under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961...
![ITAT upholds Penalty imposed for violating Provision of S.269SS of Income Tax Act due to accepting Loan from Company’s Managing Director [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/ITAT-Penalty-violating-Provision-Income-Tax-Act-Loan-from-Companys-Managing-Director-Loan-Companys-Managing-Director-taxscan.jpg "ITAT upholds Penalty imposed for violating Provision of S.269SS of Income Tax Act due to accepting Loan from Company’s Managing Director [Read Order]")
![ITAT quashes Penalty imposed u/s 271D of Income Tax Act in Absence of Satisfaction in Assessment Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Assessment-Order-passed-without-enquiry-Assessment-Order-CFS-Charges-Continental-Warehousing-Corporation-ITAT-Revision-Order-taxscan.jpg "ITAT quashes Penalty imposed u/s 271D of Income Tax Act in Absence of Satisfaction in Assessment Order [Read Order]")
![Penalty u/s 271 D of Income Tax Act Passed Beyond 6 Months is Barred by Limitation: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Act-Passed-Beyond-6-Months-is-Barred-by-Limitation-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Penalty u/s 271 D of Income Tax Act Passed Beyond 6 Months is Barred by Limitation: ITAT [Read Order]")
![ITAT Quashes Invalid Penalty Order on Deceased Assessee u/s 159(2) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/ITAT-Quashes-Invalid-Penalty-Order-Deceased-Assessee-us-1592-of-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT Quashes Invalid Penalty Order on Deceased Assessee u/s 159(2) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
![Contravention of S. 269SS for Sale of Property for HUF: ITAT Upholds Penalty u/s 271D [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Contravention-Sale-of-Property-HUF-ITAT-Penalty-Taxscan.jpg "Contravention of S. 269SS for Sale of Property for HUF: ITAT Upholds Penalty u/s 271D [Read Order]")
“Loan Given” in Cash Exceeding Prescribed Limit does not attract Penalty u/s 271D of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]
The Indore bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) recently held that in case of “loan given” Penalty under section 271D Income Tax Act 1961 would be invalid. The fact of the case is that...
![“Loan Given” in Cash Exceeding Prescribed Limit does not attract Penalty u/s 271D of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Loan-Cash-Exceeding-Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Tax-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "“Loan Given” in Cash Exceeding Prescribed Limit does not attract Penalty u/s 271D of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
Lapse of Six Months on Penalty proceedings violation of Cash Transactions u/s 269SS: Delhi HC quashes Penalty [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court quashed penalty under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the ground that there was lapse of six months on penalty proceedings on violation of cash transactions under...
![Lapse of Six Months on Penalty proceedings violation of Cash Transactions u/s 269SS: Delhi HC quashes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Penalty-penalty-proceedings-Cash-Transaction-violation-of-cash-transactions-Delhi-HC-penalty-taxscan.jpg "Lapse of Six Months on Penalty proceedings violation of Cash Transactions u/s 269SS: Delhi HC quashes Penalty [Read Order]")
ITAT deletes Penalty Imposed for accepting Cash Payment for Sale of Land: No Sufficient Reasons to show Tax Evasion Attempt [Read Order]
The Banglore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), recently deleted the penalty imposed under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as the revenue could not show sufficient reasons to...
![ITAT deletes Penalty Imposed for accepting Cash Payment for Sale of Land: No Sufficient Reasons to show Tax Evasion Attempt [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/ITAT-Penalty-Cash-Payment-Sale-of-Land-Tax-Evasion-taxscan.jpg "ITAT deletes Penalty Imposed for accepting Cash Payment for Sale of Land: No Sufficient Reasons to show Tax Evasion Attempt [Read Order]")
“Reasonable Cause” u/s 269SS of Income Tax Act shall be related to Meet Exigency of Business: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271D [Read Order]
The Bangalore bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) while deleting the penalty under section 271D of Income Tax Act 1961 held that reasonable cause under section 269SS of Income Tax Act 1961...
![“Reasonable Cause” u/s 269SS of Income Tax Act shall be related to Meet Exigency of Business: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271D [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Reasonable-Cause-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Tax-Business-ITAT-Penalty-Taxscan.jpg "“Reasonable Cause” u/s 269SS of Income Tax Act shall be related to Meet Exigency of Business: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271D [Read Order]")
Loan to Director due to Urgent need of Finance in Company, reflected in Books will not attract S. 269SS: ITAT deletes Penalty
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad bench has held that the loan to the Director due to urgent need of finance in the Company which is duly reflected in the journal entries will not...
