Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Anti-dumping Duty cannot be Demanded on Propylene Glycol from USA Imported after 08.10.2009: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Anti-dumping-Duty-Propylene-Glycol-USA-Imported-CESTAT-customs-Excise-Service-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Anti-dumping Duty cannot be Demanded on Propylene Glycol from USA Imported after 08.10.2009: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Anti-dumping Duty cannot be Demanded on Propylene Glycol from USA Imported after 08.10.2009: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ), ruled that anti-dumping duty cannot be Demanded on...
![Placing Orders with Importers does not amount to Import: CESTAT quashes vague SCN and sets aside Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Importers-CESTAT-SCN-Show-Cause-Notice-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "Placing Orders with Importers does not amount to Import: CESTAT quashes vague SCN and sets aside Penalty [Read Order]")
![Order allowing benefit U/s 28(6)(i) to importer company & MD and denying the same to CHA is not permissible: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/importer-company-MD-CHA-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Order allowing benefit U/s 28(6)(i) to importer company & MD and denying the same to CHA is not permissible: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Allegation of undue Export benefit not sustainable in the absence of Corroborative Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/export-benefit-Corroborative-evidence-CESTAT-taxscan.jpeg "Allegation of undue Export benefit not sustainable in the absence of Corroborative Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![CBIC clarifies arrangements for 1st phase of All India Roll-Out of Faceless Assessment [Read Circular]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Faceless-E-Assessment-Taxscan.jpg "CBIC clarifies arrangements for 1st phase of All India Roll-Out of Faceless Assessment [Read Circular]")
![S. 28 Customs Act Conditions unsatisfied: CESTAT quashes Limitation barred Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-Limitation-Barred-Rules-Section-28-of-Customs-Act-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-taxscan.jpg "S. 28 Customs Act Conditions unsatisfied: CESTAT quashes Limitation barred Order [Read Order]")
No Evidence showing Mismatch of Imported Goods and Description as per Excise Exemption Notification, No Duty Demand u/s 28 of Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that duty is not demandable under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 in absence of evidence showing a...
![No Evidence showing Mismatch of Imported Goods and Description as per Excise Exemption Notification, No Duty Demand u/s 28 of Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Evidence-Mismatch-of-Imported-Goods-Excise-Exemption-Notification-Duty-Demand-Customs-Act-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "No Evidence showing Mismatch of Imported Goods and Description as per Excise Exemption Notification, No Duty Demand u/s 28 of Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Period of five years u/s 28 of Customs Act is prescribed Period of Limitation: Delhi HC upheld order of CESTAT [Read Order]
Upholding the Order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘CESTAT’) ruled that the period of five years under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 is prescribed period of...
![Period of five years u/s 28 of Customs Act is prescribed Period of Limitation: Delhi HC upheld order of CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Period-Customs-Act-Limitation-Delhi-HC-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Period of five years u/s 28 of Customs Act is prescribed Period of Limitation: Delhi HC upheld order of CESTAT [Read Order]")