Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Order allowing benefit U/s 28(6)(i) to importer company & MD and denying the same to CHA is not permissible: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/importer-company-MD-CHA-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Order allowing benefit U/s 28(6)(i) to importer company & MD and denying the same to CHA is not permissible: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Order allowing benefit U/s 28(6)(i) to importer company & MD and denying the same to CHA is not permissible: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) Order allowing benefit U/s 28(6)(i) of the Customs Act,1962 to...
![Allegation of undue Export benefit not sustainable in the absence of Corroborative Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/export-benefit-Corroborative-evidence-CESTAT-taxscan.jpeg "Allegation of undue Export benefit not sustainable in the absence of Corroborative Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![CBIC clarifies arrangements for 1st phase of All India Roll-Out of Faceless Assessment [Read Circular]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Faceless-E-Assessment-Taxscan.jpg "CBIC clarifies arrangements for 1st phase of All India Roll-Out of Faceless Assessment [Read Circular]")
![S. 28 Customs Act Conditions unsatisfied: CESTAT quashes Limitation barred Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-Limitation-Barred-Rules-Section-28-of-Customs-Act-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-taxscan.jpg "S. 28 Customs Act Conditions unsatisfied: CESTAT quashes Limitation barred Order [Read Order]")
![No Evidence showing Mismatch of Imported Goods and Description as per Excise Exemption Notification, No Duty Demand u/s 28 of Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Evidence-Mismatch-of-Imported-Goods-Excise-Exemption-Notification-Duty-Demand-Customs-Act-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "No Evidence showing Mismatch of Imported Goods and Description as per Excise Exemption Notification, No Duty Demand u/s 28 of Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Period of five years u/s 28 of Customs Act is prescribed Period of Limitation: Delhi HC upheld order of CESTAT [Read Order]
Upholding the Order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘CESTAT’) ruled that the period of five years under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 is prescribed period of...
![Period of five years u/s 28 of Customs Act is prescribed Period of Limitation: Delhi HC upheld order of CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Period-Customs-Act-Limitation-Delhi-HC-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Period of five years u/s 28 of Customs Act is prescribed Period of Limitation: Delhi HC upheld order of CESTAT [Read Order]")