Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Disallowance of Expenditure Written off deleted Without Examining Commercial Rationale and Nature of Loss: ITAT Remands Matter [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/22/500x300_2113756-disallowance-expenditure-written-off-taxscan.webp "Disallowance of Expenditure Written off deleted Without Examining Commercial Rationale and Nature of Loss: ITAT Remands Matter [Read Order]")
Disallowance of Expenditure Written off deleted Without Examining Commercial Rationale and Nature of Loss: ITAT Remands Matter [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) remanded the matter of a disallowed expenditure write off totaling ₹4,19,61,906 back...
![Non-Compete Fee Paid to Ward Off Competition is Revenue Expenditure, Not Capital Asset: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/20/250x150_2113472-non-compete-fee-paid-ward-off-competition-revenue-expenditure-capital-asset-supreme-court-taxscan.webp "Non-Compete Fee Paid to Ward Off Competition is Revenue Expenditure, Not Capital Asset: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]")
![Foreign Company’s Head Office Expenses For Indian Branches Subject to S. 44C Even if Incurred Exclusively: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/16/250x150_2112511-foreign-company-head-office-expenses-indian-branches-supreme-court-taxscan.webp "Foreign Company’s Head Office Expenses For Indian Branches Subject to S. 44C Even if Incurred Exclusively: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]")
![Disallowance of Stock Write-Down u/s 37(1) without Examining Evidence Unjustified: ITAT Remands Matter for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/17/250x150_2106038-itat-disallowance-of-stock-write-down-itat-remands-matter-for-fresh-adjudication-taxscan.webp "Disallowance of Stock Write-Down u/s 37(1) without Examining Evidence Unjustified: ITAT Remands Matter for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")
Penalty Paid to Third Parties for Breach of Contract Not Hit by Explanation u/s 37(1): ITAT Deletes ₹34.71 Lakh Disallowance [Read Order]
The Kolkata bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the penalty paid to third parties for breach of contract does not come under the explanation of Sec 37(1). ITAT deleted the...
![Penalty Paid to Third Parties for Breach of Contract Not Hit by Explanation u/s 37(1): ITAT Deletes ₹34.71 Lakh Disallowance [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/01/500x300_2093008-2061821-penalty-hc-taxscan.webp "Penalty Paid to Third Parties for Breach of Contract Not Hit by Explanation u/s 37(1): ITAT Deletes ₹34.71 Lakh Disallowance [Read Order]")