Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![No Addition If Delay in Depositing Cash withdrawn was explained by way of Oral Evidence: Delhi High Court [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Delhi-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "No Addition If Delay in Depositing Cash withdrawn was explained by way of Oral Evidence: Delhi High Court [Read Judgment]")
No Addition If Delay in Depositing Cash withdrawn was explained by way of Oral Evidence: Delhi High Court [Read Judgment]
The Delhi High Court annulling the decisions of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) held that if there is a...
![When Company has Sufficient Share Capital & Premium through Reserves, Its Capacity to Invest can’t be Suspected: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Sale-of-Shares-Tax-Scan.jpg "When Company has Sufficient Share Capital & Premium through Reserves, Its Capacity to Invest can’t be Suspected: ITAT [Read Order]")
![ITAT confirms Addition since Assessee and Family received Huge Gifts and failed to prove any relationship with Donor [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Gifts-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT confirms Addition since Assessee and Family received Huge Gifts and failed to prove any relationship with Donor [Read Order]")
![No Addition if Assessee able to Prove Genuineness of Transaction: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/ITAT-Taxscan-1.jpg "No Addition if Assessee able to Prove Genuineness of Transaction: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Re-Assessment passed after 4 years without Approval of Chief Commissioner or Commissioner of Income Tax is Invalid: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Re-Assessment.jpg "Re-Assessment passed after 4 years without Approval of Chief Commissioner or Commissioner of Income Tax is Invalid: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]")
Mere Establishing the Identity of Creditors is not sufficient to Discharge Burden of Proof u/s 68 of Income Tax Act: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]
In Sunil Thomas v. ITO & Anr, the division bench of the Kerala High Court ruled that mere establishing identity of creditors would not validates that the assessee had discharged burden of proof...
![Mere Establishing the Identity of Creditors is not sufficient to Discharge Burden of Proof u/s 68 of Income Tax Act: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Kerala-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Mere Establishing the Identity of Creditors is not sufficient to Discharge Burden of Proof u/s 68 of Income Tax Act: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]")