![Amount given by Co-Purchaser for Services towards Arranging Sale is Income: ITAT confirms Income Tax Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Amount-Co-Purchaser-Services-Arranging-Sale-Income-ITAT-Income-Tax-TAXSCAN.jpg "Amount given by Co-Purchaser for Services towards Arranging Sale is Income: ITAT confirms Income Tax Addition [Read Order]")
Amount given by Co-Purchaser for Services towards Arranging Sale is Income: ITAT confirms Income Tax Addition [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the amount given by the co-purchaser for service towards arranging sales is...
![Unsecured Loan Availed not to be Treated as Unexplained Cash Credits u/s 68 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Unsecured-Loan-Availed-not-to-be-Treated-as-Unexplained-Cash-Credits-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-TAXSCAN-1.jpg "Unsecured Loan Availed not to be Treated as Unexplained Cash Credits u/s 68 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Income from Unexplained cash u/s 68 of Income Tax Act cant be claimed as an Exemption: ITAT dismisses Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Income-from-Unexplained-cash-Unexplained-cash-Income-Tax-Act-Exemption-ITAT-dismisses-Appeal-taxscan.jpg "Income from Unexplained cash u/s 68 of Income Tax Act cant be claimed as an Exemption: ITAT dismisses Appeal [Read Order]")
![Onus to Prove Genuineness of Transaction of Sale of Share not being Bogus not Discharged by Mere Filing of Documentary Evidence: ITAT Confirms Income Tax Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Onus-Prove-Genuiness-Transaction-Sale-Share-Bogus-Documentary-Evidence-ITAT-Income-tax-taxscan.jpg "Onus to Prove Genuineness of Transaction of Sale of Share not being Bogus not Discharged by Mere Filing of Documentary Evidence: ITAT Confirms Income Tax Addition [Read Order]")
![ITAT Directs AO to delete Addition made u/s 68 of Income Tax Act based on Mere Suspicion [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Assessing-officer-Delete-addition-Income-Tax-Act-Suspicion-ITAT-income-tax-act-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Directs AO to delete Addition made u/s 68 of Income Tax Act based on Mere Suspicion [Read Order]")
Proper Explanation of Income of Sales Cannot be Added u/s 68 of Income Tax Act Unless it Proved as ‘Bogus’: ITAT [Read Order]
The New Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT) held that the proper explanation of income of sales cannot be added under section 68 of the Income Tax Act,1961 unless it proved...
![Proper Explanation of Income of Sales Cannot be Added u/s 68 of Income Tax Act Unless it Proved as ‘Bogus’: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Proper-Explanation-Income-of-Sales-Income-Tax-Act-Unless-Proved-as-Bogus-TAXSCAN.jpg "Proper Explanation of Income of Sales Cannot be Added u/s 68 of Income Tax Act Unless it Proved as ‘Bogus’: ITAT [Read Order]")
Absence of Formal Loan Agreement or Repayment Schedule Does Not Justify Treating Unsecured Loan as Unexplained Cash Credit u/s 68 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad bench has held that the absence of a formal loan agreement or repayment schedule does not justify treating the unsecured loan as unexplained cash...
![Absence of Formal Loan Agreement or Repayment Schedule Does Not Justify Treating Unsecured Loan as Unexplained Cash Credit u/s 68 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/loan-agreement-unsecured-loan-unexplained-cash-credit-itat-income-tax-tax-absence-of-formal-loan-agreement-treating-unsecured-loan-as-unexplained-cash-credit-cash-credit-taxscan.jpg "Absence of Formal Loan Agreement or Repayment Schedule Does Not Justify Treating Unsecured Loan as Unexplained Cash Credit u/s 68 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
Failure to Prove Creditworthiness of Parties and Genuineness of Transaction :ITAT Upholds Addition u/s 68 [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has upheld addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act 1961 on failure to prove the creditworthiness of the parties and genuineness of...
![Failure to Prove Creditworthiness of Parties and Genuineness of Transaction :ITAT Upholds Addition u/s 68 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Creditworthiness-of-Parties-and-Genuineness-of-Transaction-Genuineness-of-Transaction-ITAT-Upholds-Addition-ITAT-Addition-Taxscan.jpg "Failure to Prove Creditworthiness of Parties and Genuineness of Transaction :ITAT Upholds Addition u/s 68 [Read Order]")
Notice Received via Email Despite Form No. 35 Request for Physical Service of Notice: ITAT sets aside Ex-Parte Order [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside the exparte order as the notice was received via email despite the request for physical service of notice in Form No.35. ...
![Notice Received via Email Despite Form No. 35 Request for Physical Service of Notice: ITAT sets aside Ex-Parte Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/EMAIL-NOTICES-ITAT-Notice-Received-via-Email-Despite-TAXSCAN.jpg "Notice Received via Email Despite Form No. 35 Request for Physical Service of Notice: ITAT sets aside Ex-Parte Order [Read Order]")
Mere Furnishing of Income Tax Returns and Bank Statements without any Explanation for Deposits not Meet Requirements of S. 68: ITAT [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that mere furnishing of income Tax returns and bank statements without giving any explanation for deposits would not meet the...
![Mere Furnishing of Income Tax Returns and Bank Statements without any Explanation for Deposits not Meet Requirements of S. 68: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Furnishing-of-Income-Tax-Returns-Income-Tax-Returns-Income-Tax-Bank-Statements-Deposits-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Mere Furnishing of Income Tax Returns and Bank Statements without any Explanation for Deposits not Meet Requirements of S. 68: ITAT [Read Order]")
Addition made by AO u/s 68 of IT Act could not made in Absence of any Incriminating Material: ITAT quashes Order [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) quashed the order passed by the assessing officer under section 68 of the Income Tax Act,1961 for an addition made in the absence of...
![Addition made by AO u/s 68 of IT Act could not made in Absence of any Incriminating Material: ITAT quashes Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/IT-Act-could-not-made-Absence-of-any-Incriminating-Material-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Addition made by AO u/s 68 of IT Act could not made in Absence of any Incriminating Material: ITAT quashes Order [Read Order]")
AO not bound to Make Enquiry unless Assessee has Discharged Initial Onus u/s 68: ITAT Upholds Addition [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has upheld the additional holding that the Assessing officer (AO) was not bound to make enquiry unless the assessee had discharged the initial...
![AO not bound to Make Enquiry unless Assessee has Discharged Initial Onus u/s 68: ITAT Upholds Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/AO-not-bound-to-Make-Enquiry-unless-Assessee-has-Discharged-Initial-Onus-us-68-ITAT-Upholds-Addition-TAXSCAN.jpg "AO not bound to Make Enquiry unless Assessee has Discharged Initial Onus u/s 68: ITAT Upholds Addition [Read Order]")