![Mere Possession of Bank Passbook not to be treated as Books of Accounts: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/possession-of-bank-passbook-bank-passbook-ITAT-Books-of-Accounts-Income-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Mere Possession of Bank Passbook not to be treated as Books of Accounts: ITAT [Read Order]")
Mere Possession of Bank Passbook not to be treated as Books of Accounts: ITAT [Read Order]
The case of the assessee was reopened u/s 148 on the basis of the AIR information that the assessee had deposited cash to the tune of Rs. 10,46,000/-...
![AO couldn’t point out Deficiency in Documents, No Addition u/s 68 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Documents-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Tax-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "AO couldn’t point out Deficiency in Documents, No Addition u/s 68 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Inflated Sales during Demonetization Period to be Computed After Considering Average Sales of Prior One Year: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Average-Sales-Demonetization-ITAT-Income-Tax-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Inflated Sales during Demonetization Period to be Computed After Considering Average Sales of Prior One Year: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Sale Proceed of Agricultural Produce without Invoice cannot be Doubted: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Sale-Proceed-Agricultural-Produce-Invoice-Doubted-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Sale Proceed of Agricultural Produce without Invoice cannot be Doubted: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Generation of Business Income Not Necessary to Claim Business Expenditure: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Generation-of-Business-Income-Business-Income-Business-Expenditure-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Generation of Business Income Not Necessary to Claim Business Expenditure: ITAT [Read Order]")
ITAT deletes Income Tax Addition u/s 68 When Assessee submitted Corroborative Evidence related to Creditors [Read Order]
The Bangalore bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted the addition of unexplained Creditors under section 68 of the Income Tax Act,1961 when the assessee submitted Corroborative...
![ITAT deletes Income Tax Addition u/s 68 When Assessee submitted Corroborative Evidence related to Creditors [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/ITAT-deletes-Income-Tax-Addition-ITAT-Income-Tax-Addition-Income-Tax-Corroborative-Evidence-Creditors-Assessee-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT deletes Income Tax Addition u/s 68 When Assessee submitted Corroborative Evidence related to Creditors [Read Order]")
Deposit of Huge Amount of SBN Notes in Bank Account: ITAT Confirms Income Tax Addition, Directs Authorities to Investigate Role of Bank Employees
While upholding an addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Hyderabad bench has directed the concerned authorities to investigate the role of...
Receipt of Money through Banking Channel would not Make Transaction 'Genuine' If Transaction is Not Explained with Documents: ITAT [Read Order]
While directing a re-adjudication of a matter under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), Ahmedabad bench has held that mere fact that the amount...
![Receipt of Money through Banking Channel would not Make Transaction Genuine If Transaction is Not Explained with Documents: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Receipt-of-Money-Banking-Channel-Transaction-Documents-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Receipt of Money through Banking Channel would not Make Transaction Genuine If Transaction is Not Explained with Documents: ITAT [Read Order]")
Condition of Proving ‘Source of Source of Funds’ under 68 not applicable to Non-Residents: ITAT deletes Income Tax Addition [Read Order]
The Bangalore bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the condition of proving “source of source of funds” under 68 of the Income Tax Act,1961 does not apply to non-residents....
![Condition of Proving ‘Source of Source of Funds’ under 68 not applicable to Non-Residents: ITAT deletes Income Tax Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Source-of-Funds-Non-Residents-ITAT-Income-Addition-taxscan.jpg "Condition of Proving ‘Source of Source of Funds’ under 68 not applicable to Non-Residents: ITAT deletes Income Tax Addition [Read Order]")
Addition based on Unexplained Deposit becomes valid when Three conditions required u/s 68 not proved: Allahabad HC [Read Order]
The Allahabad High Court (HC) has held that an Addition based on an unexplained deposit becomes valid when Three conditions required under section 68 of the Income Tax Act,1961 are not proved. ...
![Addition based on Unexplained Deposit becomes valid when Three conditions required u/s 68 not proved: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Deposit-Allahabad-High-Court-taxscan.jpg "Addition based on Unexplained Deposit becomes valid when Three conditions required u/s 68 not proved: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")