![Addition of Unexplained Income u/s 69 of Income Tax Act in absence of Proper Documents: Kerala HC allows one more Opportunity Considering Mental Illness of MD [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Kerala-High-Court-Income-Tax-Unexplained-income-Section-69-of-the-income-tax-act-MD-mental-illness-in-income-tax-case-TAXSCAN.jpg "Addition of Unexplained Income u/s 69 of Income Tax Act in absence of Proper Documents: Kerala HC allows one more Opportunity Considering Mental Illness of MD [Read Order]")
Addition of Unexplained Income u/s 69 of Income Tax Act in absence of Proper Documents: Kerala HC allows one more Opportunity Considering Mental Illness of MD [Read Order]
In the case of the addition of unexplained income under section 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 made in the absence of Proper Documents, the Kerala...
![Addition u/s 69 is not valid Without Incriminating Evidence: Delhi HC upholds ITATs order Deleting Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Delhi-high-court-incriminating-evidence-itat-income-tax-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Deletion-of-addition-Taxscan.webp "Addition u/s 69 is not valid Without Incriminating Evidence: Delhi HC upholds ITATs order Deleting Addition [Read Order]")
![Notice u/s 274 of Income Tax Act should be issued before period of limitation: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Notice-Income-Tax-Act-before-period-limitation-Delhi-HC-TAXSCAN.jpg "Notice u/s 274 of Income Tax Act should be issued before period of limitation: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
![Sufficient Explanation on Source of Investments given on HSBC Geneva Deposits: Punjab and Haryana HC quashes income tax addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Sufficient-Explanation-Source-of-Investments-given-HSBC-Geneva-Deposits-Punjab-and-Haryana-HC-income-tax-TAXSCAN.jpg "Sufficient Explanation on Source of Investments given on HSBC Geneva Deposits: Punjab and Haryana HC quashes income tax addition [Read Order]")
![Addition u/s 69 made due to Unavailability of Transaction Information: ITAT grants final Opportunity for Non-Compliance [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Addition-Unavailability-of-Transaction-Information-Transaction-Information-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Addition u/s 69 made due to Unavailability of Transaction Information: ITAT grants final Opportunity for Non-Compliance [Read Order]")
Addition made u/s69 of Income Tax Act towards Purchase and Sale of Shares without Sufficient Evidence: ITAT Directs Re-adjudication [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) directed the Assessing Officer (AO) for re-adjudication of additions made under section 69 of the Income Tax Act,1961 towards the purchase...
![Addition made u/s69 of Income Tax Act towards Purchase and Sale of Shares without Sufficient Evidence: ITAT Directs Re-adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/without-Sufficient-Evidence-ITAT-Directs-Re-adjudication-Re-adjudication-ITAT-Directs-Tax-News-Purchase-And-Sale-Of-Share-Updates-TAXSCAN.jpg "Addition made u/s69 of Income Tax Act towards Purchase and Sale of Shares without Sufficient Evidence: ITAT Directs Re-adjudication [Read Order]")
Delhi HC Upholds Deletion of Rs. 4 Crore Addition for Unexplained Investments, dismisses Revenue’s Appeal
The Delhi High Court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in deleting the addition of Rs. 4 crore for unexplained investments under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. ...
Books of Accounts cannot be Rejected Merely based on Non-Maintenance of Stock Register in Desired Format: ITAT Deletes Addition u/s 69 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted the addition under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act holding that the books of account could not be rejected based on...
![Books of Accounts cannot be Rejected Merely based on Non-Maintenance of Stock Register in Desired Format: ITAT Deletes Addition u/s 69 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/BOOKSO1.jpg "Books of Accounts cannot be Rejected Merely based on Non-Maintenance of Stock Register in Desired Format: ITAT Deletes Addition u/s 69 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
Interest u/s 234B of Income Tax Act has to be Charged on Assessed Income and not on Returned Income: Jharkhand HC [Read Order]
The Jharkhand High Court observed that the interest under Section 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has to be charged on assessed income and not on returned income. The instant appeal is directed...
![Interest u/s 234B of Income Tax Act has to be Charged on Assessed Income and not on Returned Income: Jharkhand HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Interest-Under-Section-234B-Of-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Assessed-Income-Jharkhand-High-Court-Returned-Income-Charged-on-Assessed-Income-TAXSCAN.jpg "Interest u/s 234B of Income Tax Act has to be Charged on Assessed Income and not on Returned Income: Jharkhand HC [Read Order]")
Imposition of Income tax Addition is not Justified when Additional Amount towards Purchase of Land is made by other Two Co-owners : ITAT Condones Delay of 1494 Days [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the additional amount paid in cash on money was admittedly paid by the other two-owners and not by the assessee, thus the Assessing...
![Imposition of Income tax Addition is not Justified when Additional Amount towards Purchase of Land is made by other Two Co-owners : ITAT Condones Delay of 1494 Days [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Imposition-Income-tax-Addition-Additional-Amount-Purchase-Land-Two-Co-owners-ITAT-Condones-Delay-TAXSCAN.jpg "Imposition of Income tax Addition is not Justified when Additional Amount towards Purchase of Land is made by other Two Co-owners : ITAT Condones Delay of 1494 Days [Read Order]")
Payment made by Assessee as Shareholder of Company for Construction of Building on a plot shall not be Unexplained Investment u/s. 69 of I.T Act: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi bench held that payment made by the assessee as shareholder of the company for construction of building on a plot should not be unexplained under...
![Payment made by Assessee as Shareholder of Company for Construction of Building on a plot shall not be Unexplained Investment u/s. 69 of I.T Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Payment-assessee-shareholder-company-for-construction-building-plot-unexplained-investment-I.T-Act-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpeg "Payment made by Assessee as Shareholder of Company for Construction of Building on a plot shall not be Unexplained Investment u/s. 69 of I.T Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
ITAT directs Verification of Source Explained through Settlement before Settlement Commission for Addition u/s 69 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has directed for verification of sources explained through the settlement before the settlement commission for addition under Section 69 of...
![ITAT directs Verification of Source Explained through Settlement before Settlement Commission for Addition u/s 69 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/ITAT-directs-Verification-Source-Explained-Settlement-Settlement-Commission-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan-1.jpg "ITAT directs Verification of Source Explained through Settlement before Settlement Commission for Addition u/s 69 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")