Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![AO cannot Disturb Assessment /Re- Assessment attained Finality Except during proceeding u/s 153A: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/AO-Assessment-Re-Assessment-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "AO cannot Disturb Assessment /Re- Assessment attained Finality Except during proceeding u/s 153A: ITAT [Read Order]")
AO cannot Disturb Assessment /Re- Assessment attained Finality Except during proceeding u/s 153A: ITAT [Read Order]
The Chandigarh bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) recently held that the Assessing Officer could not disturb assessment order or...
![Satisfactory discharge of burden of proving genuineness of transactions: Bombay HC confirms deletion of disallowance u/s 69C [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Bombay-High-Court-transactions-discharge-disallowance-taxscan.jpg "Satisfactory discharge of burden of proving genuineness of transactions: Bombay HC confirms deletion of disallowance u/s 69C [Read Order]")
![Satisfaction of AO u/s 69C should be Subjective: ITAT deletes Income Tax Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/ITAT-Income-Tax-Addition-taxscan.jpeg "Satisfaction of AO u/s 69C should be Subjective: ITAT deletes Income Tax Addition [Read Order]")
![Addition for Unexplained Expenditure cannot be made merely on Assumptions without Documents: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Addition-Unexplained-Expenditure-Assumptions-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Addition for Unexplained Expenditure cannot be made merely on Assumptions without Documents: ITAT [Read Order]")
![‘Reason to Suspect’ can’t be a reason to Re-open Assessment: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Re-Assessment-Taxscan.jpg "‘Reason to Suspect’ can’t be a reason to Re-open Assessment: ITAT [Read Order]")
Addition for Unexplained Expenditure is not mandatory even if no Explanation is offered or it is found to be Unsatisfactory: HC [Read Judgment]
A division bench of the Allahabad High Court, in Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Varanasi v. Late Rama Shankar Yadav, held that addition in respect of unexplained expenditure under section 69A of the...
![Addition for Unexplained Expenditure is not mandatory even if no Explanation is offered or it is found to be Unsatisfactory: HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Expenditures-TAXSCAN.jpg "Addition for Unexplained Expenditure is not mandatory even if no Explanation is offered or it is found to be Unsatisfactory: HC [Read Judgment]")
Documents found during Search must ‘belong to Assessee’ is a necessary Condition to invoke Assessment u/s 153C: Bombay HC
The division bench of the Bombay High Court, in a recent decision, held that the documents found during search must “belong to the assessee” is a necessary condition to invoke assessment u/s 153C of...
