![CESTAT Upholds Service Tax Demand Imposed under Category of Construction of Complex Services on Ground of Absence of Conclusive Evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/CESTAT-Upholds-Service-Tax-Demand-CESTAT-Construction-of-Complex-Services-Service-Tax-Demand-Conclusive-Evidence-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Upholds Service Tax Demand Imposed under Category of Construction of Complex Services on Ground of Absence of Conclusive Evidence [Read Order]")
CESTAT Upholds Service Tax Demand Imposed under Category of 'Construction of Complex' Services on Ground of Absence of Conclusive Evidence [Read Order]
The New Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) upheld the service tax demand imposed under the category of...
![CESTAT Quashes Demand of Service Tax imposed on Repair and Maintenance of Motor Vehicles on Ground of Non Insertion of Section 65B(54) of Finance Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/CESTAT-Demand-of-Service-Tax-Service-Tax-CESTAT-Quashes-Demand-of-Service-Tax-imposed-on-Repair-and-Maintenance-of-Motor-Vehicles-taxscan-1.jpg "CESTAT Quashes Demand of Service Tax imposed on Repair and Maintenance of Motor Vehicles on Ground of Non Insertion of Section 65B(54) of Finance Act [Read Order]")
![Amount collected as ‘Administrative and Handling Charges’ From their Sister Concerns Falls under ‘Business Support Services’ Attracts Service Tax Liability: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Amount-collected-Administrative-and-Handling-Charges-From-their-Sister-Concerns-Business-Support-Services-Service-Tax-Liability-CESTAT-Administrative-and-Handling-Charges-Service-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Amount collected as ‘Administrative and Handling Charges’ From their Sister Concerns Falls under ‘Business Support Services’ Attracts Service Tax Liability: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![CESTAT quashes Penalty Imposed u/s 78 of Finance Act for Short Payment of Service Tax on ground of Genuine Disclosure of Audited Balance Sheet [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/CESTAT-Penalty-Finance-Act-Short-Payment-Service-Tax-ground-Genuine-Disclosure-TAXSCAN.jpeg "CESTAT quashes Penalty Imposed u/s 78 of Finance Act for Short Payment of Service Tax on ground of Genuine Disclosure of Audited Balance Sheet [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Quashes Penalty for Non Payment of Service Tax on ground of Wrongful Categorisation of Service Rendered as ‘Franchise Service’ [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/CESTAT-quash-penalty-impose-service-render-assessee-franchise-service-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Quashes Penalty for Non Payment of Service Tax on ground of Wrongful Categorisation of Service Rendered as ‘Franchise Service’ [Read Order]")
![No Service Tax on Konkan Railway for use of Mangalore-Roha Line: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/No-Service-Tax-Konkan-Railway-use-Mangalore-Roha-Line-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Service Tax on Konkan Railway for use of Mangalore-Roha Line: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Differential Service Tax Demand on “Erection Service”, “Pipeline Service” and “Supply of Manpower Service”: CESTAT Remands Back Matter [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), remanded back the matter in the case of Differential service tax demand on “Erection Service”, “Pipeline...
![Differential Service Tax Demand on “Erection Service”, “Pipeline Service” and “Supply of Manpower Service”: CESTAT Remands Back Matter [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Differential-Service-Tax-Demand-Erection-Service-Pipeline-Service-Supply-of-Manpower-Service-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Differential Service Tax Demand on “Erection Service”, “Pipeline Service” and “Supply of Manpower Service”: CESTAT Remands Back Matter [Read Order]")
Non-filing of ST-3 returns by Sub Contractor for Long Period will make Intent to Evade Tax: CESTAT Upholds Invocation of Extended Period [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) upheld the invocation of an extended period since non-filing of ST-3 returns by subcontractors for a long period will...
![Non-filing of ST-3 returns by Sub Contractor for Long Period will make Intent to Evade Tax: CESTAT Upholds Invocation of Extended Period [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Non-filing-of-ST-3-returns-by-Sub-Contractor-for-Long-Period-will-make-Intent-to-Evade-Tax-CESTAT-Invocation-of-Extended-Period-TAXSCAN.jpg "Non-filing of ST-3 returns by Sub Contractor for Long Period will make Intent to Evade Tax: CESTAT Upholds Invocation of Extended Period [Read Order]")
![Gauhati HC dismisses Writ Petition as Statutory Remedy is more Efficacious [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Gauhati-HC-dismisses-Writ-Petition-Statutory-Remedy-more-Efficacious-TAXSCAN.jpg "Gauhati HC dismisses Writ Petition as Statutory Remedy is more Efficacious [Read Order]")
![Reimbursable Expense not Subject to Levy of Service Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Reimbursable-Expense-Subject-Levy-Service-Tax-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Reimbursable Expense not Subject to Levy of Service Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Activity of Unloading of Milk Cans & Bottle Crates to Pre-Pack Machine Services does not fall under ‘Cargo Handling Service’: CESTAT sets aside Service Tax Demand
The Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that activity of unloading milk cans & bottle crates to pre-pack machine services does not falls...
Jharkhand HC Orders to Pay Mandatory Pre-deposit under 35F of Central Excise Act for an Appeal Hearing [Read Order]
The Jharkhand High Court in its recent judgement ordered to pay a mandatory pre-deposit under 35F of the Central Excise Act for the appeal hearing. Amar Enterprises, the Petitioner is registered...
![Jharkhand HC Orders to Pay Mandatory Pre-deposit under 35F of Central Excise Act for an Appeal Hearing [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Jharkhand-High-Court-Orders-Pay-Mandatory-Pre-deposit-Pre-deposit-Central-Excise-Act-Appeal-Hearing-Taxscan.jpg "Jharkhand HC Orders to Pay Mandatory Pre-deposit under 35F of Central Excise Act for an Appeal Hearing [Read Order]")