![Lease of Wagons to Railways can’t be treated as Supply of Tangible Goods as VAT/Sales Tax already paid: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Lease-Wagons-Railways-Supply-of-Tangible-Goods-VAT-Sales-Tax-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Lease of Wagons to Railways can’t be treated as Supply of Tangible Goods as VAT/Sales Tax already paid: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Lease of Wagons to Railways can’t be treated as 'Supply of Tangible Goods' as VAT/Sales Tax already paid: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bangalore bench has held that the activity undertaken by the appellants does not...
![Relief to Yahoo: CESTAT Appeal by Service Tax Department [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Yahoo-CESTAT-Appeal-Service-Tax-Department-Taxscan.jpeg "Relief to Yahoo: CESTAT Appeal by Service Tax Department [Read Order]")
![ITAT deletes Addition of Profits from Suppressed of Sales, on account of Unpaid Service Tax Liability [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Addition-ITAT-Profits-Sales-Unpaid-service-tax-liability-Service-tax-Tax-Tax-liability-Taxscan.jpeg "ITAT deletes Addition of Profits from Suppressed of Sales, on account of Unpaid Service Tax Liability [Read Order]")
![Service Tax paid by Mistake shall be treated as Deposit, Eligible for Refund: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Service-Tax-Mistake-Deposit-Refund-CESTAT-Service-Tax-paid-Taxscan.jpg "Service Tax paid by Mistake shall be treated as Deposit, Eligible for Refund: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Input Service Tax Credit is deductible u/s.37(1) when such Input Tax Credit is written off in Books of Accounts: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Input-Service-Tax-Credit-Input-Tax-Credit-Books-of-Accounts-ITAT-taxscan-1.jpeg "Input Service Tax Credit is deductible u/s.37(1) when such Input Tax Credit is written off in Books of Accounts: ITAT [Read Order]")
CESTAT directs Revenue to refund the admissible amount of credit to Kronos Solutions India [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ), Allahabad Bench directed the revenue to refund the admissible amount of credit to Kronos Solutions India. The appellant, Kronos...
![CESTAT directs Revenue to refund the admissible amount of credit to Kronos Solutions India [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Kronos.jpg "CESTAT directs Revenue to refund the admissible amount of credit to Kronos Solutions India [Read Order]")
![Madhya Pradesh HC quashes plea seeking direction to consider application under SLVDR Scheme [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court-plea-seeking-SLVDR-Scheme-Taxscan.jpg "Madhya Pradesh HC quashes plea seeking direction to consider application under SLVDR Scheme [Read Order]")
![Entertainment World Developers entitled for Input Service Credit of Rs. 49 Lakhs: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/CESTAT-Entertainment-World-Developers-entitled-Input-Service-Credit-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpeg "Entertainment World Developers entitled for Input Service Credit of Rs. 49 Lakhs: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Fairness should be applied while Interpreting Provisions of Dispute Resolution Scheme as Its Object is to reduce Legacy Tax Disputes: Madras HC [Read Judgment]
The Madras High Court, while granting relief to the assessee, held that the objective of the Dispute Resolution Scheme is to reduce legacy tax disputes and therefore, fairness should be there while...
![Fairness should be applied while Interpreting Provisions of Dispute Resolution Scheme as Its Object is to reduce Legacy Tax Disputes: Madras HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/SVLDRS-respondent-authority-Taxscan.jpeg "Fairness should be applied while Interpreting Provisions of Dispute Resolution Scheme as Its Object is to reduce Legacy Tax Disputes: Madras HC [Read Judgment]")
Expenses Received as Reimbursement of Expenses made on behalf of Service Recipient can’t form part of Assessable Value, No Service Tax: CESTAT
The Customs, Excises, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that expenses received as reimbursement of expenses made on behalf of service recipients by the appellant can’t form part of the...
![Delhi HC directs Tax Dept to Refund ‘Pre-Deposit’ with Interest [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Refund-interest-Taxscan.jpg "Delhi HC directs Tax Dept to Refund ‘Pre-Deposit’ with Interest [Read Order]")
Section 16(2)(c) of GST Act and Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules Constitutionally Valid: Kerala HC [Read Order]
In a significant development, the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam has dismissed two writ appeals challenging the constitutional validity of certain provisions under the Central Goods and Services...
![Section 16(2)(c) of GST Act and Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules Constitutionally Valid: Kerala HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Kerala-High-Court-judgment-on-GST-rules-Constitutional-validity-of-GST-regulations-Legal-implications-of-Kerala-HC-ruling-on-GST-Kerala-high-court-Taxscan.jpg "Section 16(2)(c) of GST Act and Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules Constitutionally Valid: Kerala HC [Read Order]")