![Failure to Affix CIN in Companys Board Report Submitted through E-form 23AC and 23ACA: MCA Fines Company and Directors ₹6,000 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/MCA-MGT-3-CA-CS-CMA-taxscan.jpg-1.webp "Failure to Affix CIN in Companys Board Report Submitted through E-form 23AC and 23ACA: MCA Fines Company and Directors ₹6,000 [Read Order]")
Failure to Affix CIN in Company's Board Report Submitted through E-form 23AC and 23ACA: MCA Fines Company and Directors ₹6,000 [Read Order]
In a recent adjudication order, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) imposed a cumulative penalty of ₹6,000 on Private Limited company and its two...
![Validity of GST Portal Notice Service: Madras HC Sets Aside Ex Parte Order Due to Ineffective Communication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Madras-High-Court-GST-Portal-GST-Portal-Notice-Service-validity-TAXSCAN.jpg "Validity of GST Portal Notice Service: Madras HC Sets Aside Ex Parte Order Due to Ineffective Communication [Read Order]")
![Once Main Noticee Settles Under SVLDRS, Penalty on Co-Noticees Cannot Survive: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Once-Main-Noticee-Once-Main-Noticee-Settles-Under-SVLDRS-SVLDRS-taxscan.jpg "Once Main Noticee Settles Under SVLDRS, Penalty on Co-Noticees Cannot Survive: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Freight and Insurance Income Not Taxable Under Service Tax: CESTAT Quashes ₹26.94 Crore Demand Against BHEL [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Relief-to-BHEL-CESTAT-Rules-Liquidated-Damages-Not-Liable-to-Service-Tax-TAXSCAN.jpg "Freight and Insurance Income Not Taxable Under Service Tax: CESTAT Quashes ₹26.94 Crore Demand Against BHEL [Read Order]")
Setback to Himalaya Wellness Company: Himachal Pradesh HC Dismisses Challenge to 15 Pages SCN Demanding Inadmissible GST ITC Worth Rs. 4.37 Crores [Read Order]
In a major ruling, the Himachal Pradesh High Court has dismissed the plea by the Himalaya Wellness Company challenging a 15 pages show cause notice (SCN) demanding inadmissible GST Input Tax Credit...
![Setback to Himalaya Wellness Company: Himachal Pradesh HC Dismisses Challenge to 15 Pages SCN Demanding Inadmissible GST ITC Worth Rs. 4.37 Crores [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Setback-to-Himalaya-Wellness-Company-Himalaya-Wellness-Company-Himachal-Pradesh-HC-taxscan.jpg "Setback to Himalaya Wellness Company: Himachal Pradesh HC Dismisses Challenge to 15 Pages SCN Demanding Inadmissible GST ITC Worth Rs. 4.37 Crores [Read Order]")
Excise Duty Demand based Solely on Input-Output Norms without Clandestine Activity Evidence: CESTAT quashes Demand [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) set aside an excise duty demand raised solely on input-output norms without any evidence to support allegations...
![Excise Duty Demand based Solely on Input-Output Norms without Clandestine Activity Evidence: CESTAT quashes Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Input-Output-Norms.jpg "Excise Duty Demand based Solely on Input-Output Norms without Clandestine Activity Evidence: CESTAT quashes Demand [Read Order]")
Stainless Steel Exporter Receives SCN 6 Years After Export: CESTAT quashes Proceedings as Time-Barred [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that proceedings initiated under the Customs Act are void if the show cause notice (SCN) is issued beyond...
![Stainless Steel Exporter Receives SCN 6 Years After Export: CESTAT quashes Proceedings as Time-Barred [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Stainless-Steel-Exporter-SCN-Export-CESTAT-Proceedings-Time-Barred-taxscan.jpg "Stainless Steel Exporter Receives SCN 6 Years After Export: CESTAT quashes Proceedings as Time-Barred [Read Order]")
CESTAT Sets Aside ₹7.16 Crore Penalty u/s 78 for Delayed Service Tax Payment Finding No Evidence of Suppression [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal(CESTAT) set aside the ₹7.16 crore penalty imposed under Section 78 of Finance Act,1994 holding that there was no evidence of...
![CESTAT Sets Aside ₹7.16 Crore Penalty u/s 78 for Delayed Service Tax Payment Finding No Evidence of Suppression [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Penalty-Incorrect-Return-Jharkhand-HC-TAXSCAN.jpg "CESTAT Sets Aside ₹7.16 Crore Penalty u/s 78 for Delayed Service Tax Payment Finding No Evidence of Suppression [Read Order]")
CESTAT remands Reversal of Proportionate Cenvat Credits w.r.t. Trading Activities for Reconsideration [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) recently remanded a case concerning the reversal of proportionate Cenvat credit related to trading activities...
![CESTAT remands Reversal of Proportionate Cenvat Credits w.r.t. Trading Activities for Reconsideration [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/CESTAT-CESTAT-Kolkata-Cenvat-Credits-TAXSCAN.jpg "CESTAT remands Reversal of Proportionate Cenvat Credits w.r.t. Trading Activities for Reconsideration [Read Order]")
Customs Dept’s Appeal over Rs 57K Drawback Dispute: Delhi HC Declines Dismisses Writ petition Citing Negligible Quantum [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has declined to entertain the appeal filed by the customs department over Rs. 57K drawback dispute by citing negligible quantum. The appeal has been filed under Section 130 of...
![Customs Dept’s Appeal over Rs 57K Drawback Dispute: Delhi HC Declines Dismisses Writ petition Citing Negligible Quantum [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Delhi-High-Court-Delhi-HC-dismisses-customs-appeal-Customs-drawback-dispute-TAXSCAN.jpg "Customs Dept’s Appeal over Rs 57K Drawback Dispute: Delhi HC Declines Dismisses Writ petition Citing Negligible Quantum [Read Order]")
S.33A of Central Excise Mandates Three Personal Hearings with Adequate Gaps: Patna HC Remands Matter [Read Order]
In a recent judgment, the Patna High Court set aside a service tax demand order for failing to comply with the requirement of granting three personal hearings under Section 33A of the Central Excise...
![S.33A of Central Excise Mandates Three Personal Hearings with Adequate Gaps: Patna HC Remands Matter [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Justice-angel-site-img.jpg "S.33A of Central Excise Mandates Three Personal Hearings with Adequate Gaps: Patna HC Remands Matter [Read Order]")