![Cement Acted Only as Binder, Not Primary Base: CESTAT rules Sand Lime Bricks Cannot Be Classified as Cement Bricks [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/500x300_2067950-sand-lime-bricks-taxscan.webp "Cement Acted Only as Binder, Not Primary Base: CESTAT rules Sand Lime Bricks Cannot Be Classified as Cement Bricks [Read Order]")
Cement Acted Only as Binder, Not Primary Base: CESTAT rules Sand Lime Bricks Cannot Be Classified as Cement Bricks [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that bricks manufactured using sand and lime with cement...
![CESTAT Lacks Jurisdiction in Gold Smuggling Case Involving Passenger Baggage [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/250x150_2067935-cestat-cestat-lacks-of-jurisdiction-lacks-of-jurisdiction-taxscan.webp "CESTAT Lacks Jurisdiction in Gold Smuggling Case Involving Passenger Baggage [Read Order]")
![Services rendered by FASPL to Foreign Companies classifiable under BSS, Tax Not leviable as it is Export of Service: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/21/250x150_2067153-services-rendered-by-faspl-faspl-to-foreign-companies-foreign-companies-taxscan.webp "Services rendered by FASPL to Foreign Companies classifiable under BSS, Tax Not leviable as it is Export of Service: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Relief for Hindustan Unilever: CESTAT Allows CENVAT Credit on Job Work Related Services Based on Earlier Rulings [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/21/250x150_2066821-relief-for-hindustan-unilever-hindustan-unilever-cestat-cestat-allows-cenvat-credit-taxscan.webp "Relief for Hindustan Unilever: CESTAT Allows CENVAT Credit on Job Work Related Services Based on Earlier Rulings [Read Order]")
![Delhi HC Waives ₹17.21 Lakh Pre-deposit Noting ₹5.36 Crore Already Paid in Service Tax Dispute over Composite Works Contract [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/21/250x150_2066787-cestat-cestat-allahabad-service-tax-taxscan.webp "Delhi HC Waives ₹17.21 Lakh Pre-deposit Noting ₹5.36 Crore Already Paid in Service Tax Dispute over Composite Works Contract [Read Order]")
Addition of ₹99.2L Cash Deposit due to non compliance of Notice to prove source of cash: ITAT Allows One Final Opportunity to Assessee [Read Order]
The Cuttack Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) restored the appeal filed by the assessee as he had failed to appear during proceedings regarding the alleged substantiated cash...
![Addition of ₹99.2L Cash Deposit due to non compliance of Notice to prove source of cash: ITAT Allows One Final Opportunity to Assessee [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/19/500x300_2065492-itat-addition-cash-deposits-bank-accounts-failure-explain-sources-taxscan-1.webp "Addition of ₹99.2L Cash Deposit due to non compliance of Notice to prove source of cash: ITAT Allows One Final Opportunity to Assessee [Read Order]")
CIT(A) cannot Reject Additional evidence u/r 46 A of Income Tax Rules against unexplained Investment Merely because of non-furnishing before AO: ITAT [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the assessee to furnish the additional evidence under rule 46 A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 before the Assessing Officer...
![CIT(A) cannot Reject Additional evidence u/r 46 A of Income Tax Rules against unexplained Investment Merely because of non-furnishing before AO: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/17/500x300_2064739-cita-cita-cannot-reject-additional-evidence-evidence-section-46-a-of-income-tax-rules-taxscan.webp "CIT(A) cannot Reject Additional evidence u/r 46 A of Income Tax Rules against unexplained Investment Merely because of non-furnishing before AO: ITAT [Read Order]")
Sharing of G-Card Credentials Led to Misdeclaration of Import Consignment: CESTAT Upholds Revocation of Customs Broker Licence [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of Customs,Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) upheld the revocation of a Customs Broker Licence, observing that the misdeclaration of import consignments was ...
![Sharing of G-Card Credentials Led to Misdeclaration of Import Consignment: CESTAT Upholds Revocation of Customs Broker Licence [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/15/500x300_2063923-customs-broker-license-taxscan.webp "Sharing of G-Card Credentials Led to Misdeclaration of Import Consignment: CESTAT Upholds Revocation of Customs Broker Licence [Read Order]")
Relief to Bosch: CESTAT Rules Notional Cost of Free Designs from Maruti Not Part of Excise Duty Valuation [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Customs,Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) granted relief to Bosch Ltd and ruled that the notional cost of free design and drawings provided by Maruti Suzuki...
![Relief to Bosch: CESTAT Rules Notional Cost of Free Designs from Maruti Not Part of Excise Duty Valuation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/07/500x300_2060584-bosch-ltd-taxscan.webp "Relief to Bosch: CESTAT Rules Notional Cost of Free Designs from Maruti Not Part of Excise Duty Valuation [Read Order]")
ITAT Sets Aside S.271(1)(c) Penalty as Additions Were Deleted and Claims Were Based on CA- Certified Audit Report [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) set aside the penalty order under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act,1961,holding it unsustainable as all additions made in the assessment...
![ITAT Sets Aside S.271(1)(c) Penalty as Additions Were Deleted and Claims Were Based on CA- Certified Audit Report [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/04/500x300_2059123-penalty-audit-taxscan.webp "ITAT Sets Aside S.271(1)(c) Penalty as Additions Were Deleted and Claims Were Based on CA- Certified Audit Report [Read Order]")
No Service Tax on Projects Completed Before July 2010, Even If Payments Are Received Later: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that service tax cannot be levied on construction projects completed before July 1, 2010, even if...
![No Service Tax on Projects Completed Before July 2010, Even If Payments Are Received Later: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/30/500x300_2056881-no-service-tax.webp "No Service Tax on Projects Completed Before July 2010, Even If Payments Are Received Later: CESTAT [Read Order]")
CESTAT Upholds Service Tax Demand Citing Backdated Agreement as Suppression; Limits Second SCN to Normal Period [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Customs,Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)upheld the service tax demand citing backdated agreement as suppression, but limited the second show cause notice to ...
![CESTAT Upholds Service Tax Demand Citing Backdated Agreement as Suppression; Limits Second SCN to Normal Period [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/25/500x300_2054248-service-tax-demand-taxscan.webp "CESTAT Upholds Service Tax Demand Citing Backdated Agreement as Suppression; Limits Second SCN to Normal Period [Read Order]")